USCareCheck

CMS certification 060022

Uch-Memorial Health System

1400 E Boulder St, Colorado Springs, CO 80909

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Uch-Memorial Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 73% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 1 h 43 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 73% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 4,311 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 7 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 4,311 completed surveys, 19% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
73%
CO 75% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
71%
CO 74% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
CO 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
76%
CO 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
58%
CO 63% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
CO 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
70%
CO 75% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
53%
CO 62% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Colorado average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CO US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 372 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 1 h 43 min 2 h 14 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 24 visits sampled 2 h 46 min 3 h 55 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 127,103 patients 0% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 20 patients 45% 66% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 258 patients 74% 72% 65%

How Uch-Memorial Health System compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Uch-Memorial Health SystemThis hospital4/573%1 h 43 min7 better 2 worse
Centura Health-Penrose St Francis Health ServicesSame city3/568%3 h 13 min8 better 2 worse
Uchealth Grandview HospitalSame cityNot rated89%1 h 41 min2 better
St Francis Hospital - InterquestSame cityNot rated76%1 h 58 minNo different
Evans ACH (FT Carson)Same county · Fort CarsonNot rated76%2 h 8 min—

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Colorado Springs.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,025 cases Too few cases 3.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 272 cases Too few cases 9.2% 11.9%
Heart failure 644 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 667 cases Too few cases 14.5% 15.2%
Stroke 554 cases Too few cases 13% 11.9%
COPD 155 cases Too few cases 9.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 57 cases Too few cases 1.9% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 better than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Better 0.71 likely 0.47 – 0.96 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 197 cases No different 188.12 per 1,000 likely 151.09 per 1,000 – 225.15 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 9,105 cases No different 0.42 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.93 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 11,436 cases No different 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.41 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 11,617 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,016 cases No different 3.09 per 1,000 likely 1.85 per 1,000 – 4.33 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,167 cases No different 1.08 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.47 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,094 cases No different 7.46 per 1,000 likely 2.66 per 1,000 – 12.26 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,490 cases Better 1.73 per 1,000 likely 0.19 per 1,000 – 3.28 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,137 cases No different 3.08 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 6.14 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 876 cases No different 1.77 per 1,000 likely 0.47 per 1,000 – 3.06 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,620 cases No different 0.88 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 1.68 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.29 likely 0.11 – 0.64 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.45 likely 0.21 – 0.85 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.1 likely 0.6 – 1.88 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.05 likely 0.43 – 2.19 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.66 likely 0.29 – 1.31 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.37 likely 0.26 – 0.52 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 434 cases Too few cases 12.8% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 908 cases Too few cases 17.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 915 cases Too few cases 17.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 275 cases Too few cases 18.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 80 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 329 cases Too few cases -4.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 701 cases Too few cases -14.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 687 cases Too few cases 7.8 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 967 cases No different 15.7 per 1,000 likely 12.4 per 1,000 – 20.2 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 389 cases No different 9.3 per 100 likely 7.3 per 100 – 11.8 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 389 cases No different 6.2 per 100 likely 4.6 per 100 – 8.2 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,072 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

623 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Emergency Medicine 87
Anesthesiology 80
Physician Assistant 57
Internal Medicine 52
Family 34
Clinical 28
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 27
Anesthesiologist Assistant 20
Diagnostic Radiology 17
Pharmacist 16
Surgery 15
Nurse Practitioner 14

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $916,759 general $33,019 · research $883,740
All years, 2019–2025 $4.7M 758 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 18 19 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $416,867
  • 2020 $413,447
  • 2021 $518,833
  • 2022 $336,294
  • 2023 $628,382
  • 2024 $1.5M
  • 2025 $916,759

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $21,500 2
Space rental and facility fees $7,750 3
Education $2,000 1
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $1,769 2

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $319,071 21
Amgen Inc. $150,660 3
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $115,285 1
Eli Lilly and Company $88,013 1
AstraZeneca UK Limited $69,407 1
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $54,426 3
MicroVention, Inc. $29,992 7
Bolton Medical Inc $29,773 6

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
DS1062-A-U303 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. · NCT05555732 $163,000
DS1062-A-U304 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. · NCT05215340 $156,071
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Assessing the Impact of Olpasiran on Major Cardiovascular Events in Participants Wi… Amgen Inc. $126,244
A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double blind, Parallel group, Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab (MEDI… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $115,285
EMBER-4: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3 STUDY OF ADJUVANT IMLUNESTRANT VS STANDARD ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECE… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT05514054 $88,013
a phase III,open label,sponsor blind,randomized study of dato dxd with or without osimertinib versus platinum based doublet chemotherapy for particip… AstraZeneca UK Limited $69,407
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study of Adjuvant V940 mRNA-4157 Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Ad… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $33,210
SOFIA ASPIRATION SYSTEM AS FIRST LINE TECHNIQUE MicroVention, Inc. · NCT04451525 $29,992

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Uch-Memorial Health System

Is Uch-Memorial Health System a good hospital?

Uch-Memorial Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Uch-Memorial Health System?

73% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 4,311 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Uch-Memorial Health System emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 1 h 43 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Uch-Memorial Health System receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $916,759 in payments to Uch-Memorial Health System for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.