USCareCheck

CMS certification 060023

Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital

2635 N 7th St, Grand Junction, CO 81501

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 980 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 26 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 980 completed surveys, 26% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
CO 75% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
74%
CO 74% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
78%
CO 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
CO 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
CO 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
CO 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
78%
CO 75% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
58%
CO 62% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Colorado average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CO US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 336 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 3 h 22 min 2 h 14 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 42 visits sampled 4 h 42 min 3 h 55 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 41,743 patients 2% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 287 patients 62% 72% 65%

How Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional HospitalThis hospital4/572%3 h 22 min4 better 1 worse
Grand Junction VA Medical CenterSame city5/581%—1 better
Community HospitalSame city4/582%2 h 15 min1 better
Family Health West HospitalSame county · FruitaNot rated88%48 min1 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Grand Junction.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,987 cases Too few cases 3.1% 3.9%
Heart attack 271 cases Too few cases 11.2% 11.9%
Heart failure 232 cases Too few cases 13.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 235 cases Too few cases 17.5% 15.2%
Stroke 382 cases Too few cases 11.1% 11.9%
COPD 72 cases Too few cases 9.2% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 95 cases Too few cases 1.5% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.99 likely 0.69 – 1.29 1
After hip or knee replacement 30 cases Too few cases 4.8% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 122 cases No different 184.86 per 1,000 likely 138.36 per 1,000 – 231.36 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 4,037 cases No different 1.08 per 1,000 likely 0.41 per 1,000 – 1.75 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 4,897 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.45 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 5,033 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.45 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,781 cases No different 3.23 per 1,000 likely 1.84 per 1,000 – 4.62 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 817 cases No different 1.6 per 1,000 likely 0.11 per 1,000 – 3.1 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 746 cases No different 6.23 per 1,000 likely 0.3 per 1,000 – 12.16 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,953 cases No different 3.08 per 1,000 likely 1.2 per 1,000 – 4.96 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 773 cases No different 3.86 per 1,000 likely 0.43 per 1,000 – 7.3 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 418 cases No different 1.85 per 1,000 likely 0.42 per 1,000 – 3.29 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,161 cases No different 0.95 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 1.87 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 1.03 likely 0.5 – 1.89 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.7 likely 0.33 – 1.33 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.13 likely 0.41 – 2.5 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.21 likely 0.01 – 1.02 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.22 likely 0.1 – 0.44 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 413 cases Too few cases 11.8% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 334 cases Too few cases 20.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 368 cases Too few cases 16.8% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 146 cases Too few cases 19.8% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 103 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 29 cases Too few cases 5.7% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 303 cases Too few cases -24.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 256 cases Too few cases -37.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 247 cases Too few cases -5.9 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 201 cases No different 13.5 per 1,000 likely 10.2 per 1,000 – 18.2 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 133 cases No different 10.7 per 100 likely 7.8 per 100 – 14.3 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 133 cases No different 5.5 per 100 likely 3.8 per 100 – 8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 691 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.9 – 1.4 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

159 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 10 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Anesthesiology 19
Internal Medicine 12
Pharmacist 9
Emergency Medicine 8
Physician Assistant 8
Diagnostic Radiology 7
Emergency Medical Services 7
Family 7
Critical Care Medicine 6
Registered Nurse 6
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 5
Speech-Language Pathologist 5

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $176,067 general $5,451 · research $170,616
All years, 2019–2025 $859,204 156 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 8 8 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $16,743
  • 2020 $36,822
  • 2021 $132,482
  • 2022 $111,178
  • 2023 $207,254
  • 2024 $178,658
  • 2025 $176,067

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $2,436 7
Debt forgiveness $1,915 2
Speaking, teaching and other services $1,100 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $82,121 4
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. $69,119 2
Boston Scientific Corporation $12,062 4
Abbvie INC. $7,315 1
Smith+Nephew, Inc. $2,023 4
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C. $1,915 2
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $1,100 3
Stryker Corporation $413 3

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Phase 1/2 Study of MRTX849 in Patients With Cancer Having a KRAS G12C Mutation KRYSTAL-1 Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. · NCT03785249 $62,322
A Phase III Double-blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled International Study to assess the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Osimertinib versus Placebo i… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $48,083
A Randomised, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Phase III study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD9833 next generation oral SERD in combination w… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $21,007
US DBS REGISTRY Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT02071134 $12,062
A Phase 3 Open-label Trial of Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) Monotherapy or T-DXd followed by THP Compared to ddAC-THP in Participants wi… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $11,200
Study of Oral Navitoclax Tablet in Combination With Oral Ruxolitinib Tablet to Assess Change in Spleen Volume in Adult Participants With Relapsed Re… ABBVIE INC. $7,315
A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination With Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung … Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. · NCT03906071 $6,797
A Phase 3 Open-label Randomised Study of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato DXd) Versus Investigators Choice of Chemotherapy in Patients who are not Candid… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,832

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital

Is Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital a good hospital?

Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 980 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $176,067 in payments to Intermountain Health St. Mary's Regional Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.