USCareCheck

CMS certification 140088

The University of Chicago Medical Center

5841 South Maryland, Chicago, IL 60637

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

The University of Chicago Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 73% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 5. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 55 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 73% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,902 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 5 worse 7 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,902 completed surveys, 15% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
73%
IL 69% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
71%
IL 70% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
IL 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
80%
IL 79% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
IL 61% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
86%
IL 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
63%
IL 73% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
62%
IL 59% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Illinois average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital IL US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 309 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 55 min 2 h 42 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 26 visits sampled 11 h 54 min 4 h 48 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 101,468 patients 12% 3% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 53 patients 45% 63% 65%

How The University of Chicago Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
The University of Chicago Medical CenterThis hospital4/573%4 h 55 min7 better 5 worse
Community First Medical CenterSame city2/5—3 h 55 min1 better 1 worse
Louis a Weiss Memorial HospitalSame city1/5—3 h 30 minNo different
Amita Health Resurrection Medical CenterSame city3/566%3 h 6 min1 better 1 worse
Holy Cross HospitalSame city2/544%2 h 53 min2 better 1 worse
Roseland Community HospitalSame city1/542%4 h 6 min1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Chicago.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,933 cases Too few cases 2.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 96 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 482 cases Too few cases 8.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 293 cases Too few cases 12.2% 15.2%
Stroke 511 cases Too few cases 9.3% 11.9%
COPD 174 cases Too few cases 6.9% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 215 cases Too few cases 1.3% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.85 likely 0.66 – 1.03 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 308 cases No different 150.76 per 1,000 likely 121.34 per 1,000 – 180.17 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 11,717 cases No different 0.43 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.81 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 12,594 cases No different 0.21 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 13,873 cases No different 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,245 cases No different 1.79 per 1,000 likely 0.72 per 1,000 – 2.86 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,814 cases No different 2.21 per 1,000 likely 1.12 per 1,000 – 3.31 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,713 cases No different 6.33 per 1,000 likely 2.99 per 1,000 – 9.68 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,511 cases No different 3.69 per 1,000 likely 2.22 per 1,000 – 5.17 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,768 cases No different 4.82 per 1,000 likely 2.5 per 1,000 – 7.14 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,013 cases No different 1.45 per 1,000 likely 0.18 per 1,000 – 2.73 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 3,148 cases No different 0.77 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 1.52 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.59 likely 0.41 – 0.83 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.47 likely 0.31 – 0.7 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.91 likely 0.52 – 1.49 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.7 likely 0.12 – 2.32 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.56 likely 0.3 – 0.95 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.53 likely 0.43 – 0.64 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 194 cases Too few cases 15.5% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 987 cases Too few cases 23.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 512 cases Too few cases 17.4% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 393 cases Too few cases 18.1% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 232 cases Too few cases 10.7% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 128 cases Too few cases 28 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 625 cases Too few cases 40.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 312 cases Too few cases 36.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,497 cases No different 13.2 per 1,000 likely 10.3 per 1,000 – 16.9 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,420 cases Worse 12.8 per 100 likely 11.3 per 100 – 14.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,420 cases No different 4.6 per 100 likely 3.8 per 100 – 5.6 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 812 cases No different 0.8 likely 0.7 – 1.1 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

3,456 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 256 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 316
Pediatrics 201
Anesthesiology 197
Emergency Medicine 171
Physician Assistant 125
Family 111
Diagnostic Radiology 110
Surgery 99
Obstetrics & Gynecology 89
Hospitalist 88
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 81
Neurology 77

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $1.2M general $458,404 · research $734,077
All years, 2019–2025 $4.5M 582 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 6 20 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $241,131
  • 2020 $810,375
  • 2021 $286,178
  • 2022 $294,058
  • 2023 $975,530
  • 2024 $746,734
  • 2025 $1.2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $279,127 11
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $78,299 3
Debt forgiveness $43,354 41
Space rental and facility fees $34,536 7
Speaking, teaching and other services $11,575 12
Gifts $8,910 2
Education $2,500 1
Food and beverage $103 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $894,702 15
Agilent Technologies, Inc. $72,467 4
AngioDynamics, Inc. $60,000 1
BrioHealth Solutions, Inc. $55,960 2
KLS-Martin L.P. $36,426 39
MED-EL Corporation $18,680 2
Scientia Vascular $16,800 2
Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $15,000 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase I/II Study to Investigate the Combination of LP-118, Ponatinib, Vincristine and Dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory T-ALL/LBL Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $452,800
Longitudinal Changes of Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Measures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease PROMISE Study--Fitbit study --no compound Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $162,730
Innovate BrioHealth Solutions, Inc. $55,960
Vedolizumab-4054 A Study of Vedolizumab With Tofacitinib in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $32,791
ENTYVIO (VEDOLIZUMAB) LONG-TERM SAFETY STUDY: AN INTERNATIONAL OBSERVATIONAL PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY COMPARING VEDOLIZUMAB TO OTHER BIOLOGIC AGENTS … Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $25,272
A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER REGISTRY FOR PATIENTS WITH SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. · NCT01990040 $4,524

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about The University of Chicago Medical Center

Is The University of Chicago Medical Center a good hospital?

The University of Chicago Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 5. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend The University of Chicago Medical Center?

73% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,902 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the The University of Chicago Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 55 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 12% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does The University of Chicago Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $1.2M in payments to The University of Chicago Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.