USCareCheck

CMS certification 240080

M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center

2450 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 54 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 69% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 405 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 3 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 405 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
69%
MN 74% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
68%
MN 75% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
75%
MN 82% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
MN 82% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
56%
MN 65% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
89%
MN 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
63%
MN 75% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
47%
MN 66% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Minnesota average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital MN US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 355 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 2 h 54 min 2 h 11 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 50 visits sampled 5 h 18 min 3 h 24 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 52,842 patients 2% 2% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 85 patients 73% 58% 65%

How M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical CenterThis hospital4/569%2 h 54 min3 better
Minneapolis VA Medical CenterSame city5/581%—5 better 2 worse
Hennepin County Medical CenterSame city3/563%3 h 55 min3 better
Abbott Northwestern HospitalSame city4/572%3 h 3 min2 better 1 worse
M Health Fairview Southdale HospitalSame county · Edina5/571%3 h 24 min8 better
Park Nicollet Methodist HospitalSame county · Saint Louis Park3/581%4 h 17 min3 better 3 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Minneapolis.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,958 cases Too few cases 2.5% 3.9%
Heart attack 44 cases Too few cases 11.9% 11.9%
Heart failure 190 cases Too few cases 8.9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 181 cases Too few cases 12.1% 15.2%
Stroke 177 cases Too few cases 10% 11.9%
COPD 27 cases Too few cases 8.1% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 66 cases Too few cases 2.5% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 better than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.85 likely 0.64 – 1.06 1
After hip or knee replacement 87 cases Too few cases 6.3% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 247 cases No different 198.81 per 1,000 likely 161.42 per 1,000 – 236.2 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 6,733 cases Better 0.16 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.61 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 6,968 cases No different 0.14 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 7,891 cases No different 0.32 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 0.51 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,587 cases No different 1.72 per 1,000 likely 0.41 per 1,000 – 3.03 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,474 cases No different 2.01 per 1,000 likely 0.8 per 1,000 – 3.22 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,468 cases No different 8.36 per 1,000 likely 4.84 per 1,000 – 11.88 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,510 cases No different 4.8 per 1,000 likely 3.15 per 1,000 – 6.45 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,546 cases No different 4.34 per 1,000 likely 2.11 per 1,000 – 6.57 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 820 cases No different 1.6 per 1,000 likely 0.27 per 1,000 – 2.94 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,072 cases No different 0.75 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.57 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.94 likely 0.71 – 1.23 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.66 likely 0.4 – 1.03 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.94 likely 0.48 – 1.68 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.92 likely 0.24 – 2.51 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.56 likely 0.28 – 1 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.43 likely 0.31 – 0.57 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 worse than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 101 cases Too few cases 15.3% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 420 cases Too few cases 19.5% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 397 cases Too few cases 17.9% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 93 cases Too few cases 20.5% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 62 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 98 cases Too few cases 5.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 62 cases Too few cases -32.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 240 cases Too few cases -7.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 179 cases Too few cases 63.6 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 321 cases No different 14 per 1,000 likely 10.6 per 1,000 – 18.8 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 707 cases Worse 13.9 per 100 likely 11.6 per 100 – 16.3 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 707 cases Worse 7.3 per 100 likely 5.7 per 100 – 9.1 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 322 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.9 – 1.4 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,312 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 205 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Occupational Therapist 144
Physical Therapist 122
Pediatrics 83
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 63
Internal Medicine 62
Clinical 54
Speech-Language Pathologist 53
Physician Assistant 43
Psychiatry 42
Rehabilitation Practitioner 42
Dietitian, Registered 38
Emergency Medicine 37

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2.7M general $443,922 · research $2.3M
All years, 2019–2025 $7.8M 987 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 30 39 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.2M
  • 2020 $884,235
  • 2021 $634,236
  • 2022 $339,435
  • 2023 $981,288
  • 2024 $1M
  • 2025 $2.7M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $193,784 36
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $131,677 23
Speaking, teaching and other services $95,040 12
Grants $14,000 3
Education $8,500 4
Gifts $740 1
Debt forgiveness $182 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Abbvie INC. $813,882 4
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $670,992 50
Amgen Inc. $168,642 3
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $168,364 20
Transmedics, INC. $135,901 18
Boston Scientific Corporation $114,937 35
Abbott Laboratories $104,703 8
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $94,825 4

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A randomized phase II trial of Mirvetuximab soravtansine (IMGN853), in BRCA wild-type, folate receptor alpha (FR)-positive recurrent ovarian cancer e… ABBVIE INC. $610,412
A PHASE 1/2, FIRST-IN-HUMAN, OPEN LABEL, DOSE ESCALATION STUDY OF MVC-101, AN EGFR X CD3 CONDITIONAL BISPECIFIC REDIRECTED ACTIVATION (COBRATM) PROTE… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $343,921
TAK-280-1501 Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $220,206
Single-Arm Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in First-Line Treatment of Patients receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Ad… ABBVIE INC. $203,471
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Milvexian, an Oral … Janssen Research & Development, LLC $160,034
OLP-II TRANSMEDICS, INC. $90,968
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Assessing the Impact of Olpasiran on Major Cardiovascular Events in Participants Wi… Amgen Inc. $90,767
A Phase III Randomised Doubleblind Study to Evaluate the Effect of Balcinrenone Dapagliflozin Compared with Dapagliflozin on the Risk of Heart Failur… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $89,825

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center

Is M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center a good hospital?

M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center?

69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 405 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 54 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2.7M in payments to M Health Fairview University of Mn Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.