USCareCheck

CMS certification 260032

Barnes Jewish Hospital

One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Saint Louis, MO 63110

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Barnes Jewish Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 79% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 37 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 79% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 7,124 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 4 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 7,124 completed surveys, 35% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
79%
MO 71% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
72%
MO 72% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
MO 79% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
MO 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
58%
MO 61% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
MO 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
64%
MO 73% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
53%
MO 61% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Missouri average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital MO US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 372 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 37 min 2 h 35 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 28 visits sampled 6 h 16 min 4 h 23 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 87,066 patients 7% 3% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 342 patients 36% 63% 65%

How Barnes Jewish Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Barnes Jewish HospitalThis hospital4/579%4 h 37 min4 better 2 worse
SSM Health Saint Louis University HospitalSame city1/565%5 h 35 min3 better 3 worse
SSM Health St Mary's Hospital - St LouisSame city3/563%2 h 46 min3 better 2 worse
Mercy Hospital SouthSame city2/565%4 h 14 min1 better 1 worse
Missouri Baptist Medical CenterSame city5/581%4 h 22 min8 better 1 worse
Christian Hospital NortheastSame city4/566%3 h 37 min2 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Saint Louis.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 7,682 cases Too few cases 2.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 127 cases Too few cases 12.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 536 cases Too few cases 11.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 360 cases Too few cases 14.8% 15.2%
Stroke 630 cases Too few cases 10.3% 11.9%
COPD 127 cases Too few cases 8.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 162 cases Too few cases 1.5% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.95 likely 0.82 – 1.09 1
After hip or knee replacement 77 cases Too few cases 3.6% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 676 cases No different 157.2 per 1,000 likely 133.44 per 1,000 – 180.96 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 18,767 cases No different 0.61 per 1,000 likely 0.32 per 1,000 – 0.91 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 19,562 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 21,285 cases No different 0.19 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 6,874 cases No different 2.11 per 1,000 likely 1.29 per 1,000 – 2.93 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 4,451 cases No different 2.02 per 1,000 likely 1.22 per 1,000 – 2.81 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 4,092 cases No different 9.54 per 1,000 likely 7.29 per 1,000 – 11.79 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 7,936 cases No different 2.68 per 1,000 likely 1.62 per 1,000 – 3.75 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 4,418 cases No different 5.26 per 1,000 likely 3.72 per 1,000 – 6.8 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 2,300 cases No different 1.44 per 1,000 likely 0.35 per 1,000 – 2.54 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 5,827 cases No different 0.81 per 1,000 likely 0.22 per 1,000 – 1.39 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.79 likely 0.6 – 1.02 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.55 likely 0.41 – 0.73 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.25 likely 0.86 – 1.77 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.36 likely 0.55 – 2.83 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.73 likely 0.5 – 1.02 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.65 likely 0.55 – 0.75 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 374 cases Too few cases 13% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,156 cases Too few cases 23.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 584 cases Too few cases 17.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 314 cases Too few cases 21.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 142 cases Too few cases 10.5% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 76 cases Too few cases 5.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 227 cases Too few cases 28.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 644 cases Too few cases 34.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 379 cases Too few cases -10 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,580 cases No different 12.5 per 1,000 likely 9.8 per 1,000 – 16.1 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,529 cases Worse 12.6 per 100 likely 11.1 per 100 – 14.2 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,529 cases No different 4.8 per 100 likely 3.9 per 100 – 6 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,767 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.8 – 1.1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $670,258 general $409,344 · research $260,913
All years, 2019–2025 $4.7M 798 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 10 22 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $588,556
  • 2020 $712,106
  • 2021 $434,798
  • 2022 $839,011
  • 2023 $778,202
  • 2024 $678,023
  • 2025 $670,258

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $202,804 10
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $121,033 24
Debt forgiveness $47,494 7
Education $26,123 8
Consulting fees $10,640 2
Space rental and facility fees $1,250 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
National Marrow Donor Program $110,865 5
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $108,799 62
Jenavalve Technology, Inc. $101,779 5
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $80,244 2
AngioDynamics, Inc. $73,250 3
Stryker Corporation $68,962 14
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $38,948 1
Rti Surgical, INC $20,279 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
DS3201-A-U202 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. · NCT04703192 $108,799
A PHASE II STUDY OF IRD (IXAZOMIB, LENALIDOMIDE, & DEXAMETHASONE) FOR CONSOLIDATION THERAPY POST AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOLLOWED BY MAI… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $80,244
A double-blind, randomized single-center clinical trial to compare to the effectiveness of suvorexant 20 mg vs. placebo in decreasing amyloid- accum… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $38,948
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran on Preventing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Even… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $13,583
Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm IDE Study of the Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System With the Shockwave C2+ 2Hz Coronary I… Shockwave Medical, Inc $13,024
Prospective, Multi-center, Single-arm Study of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System for Treatment of Calcified Per… Shockwave Medical, Inc $4,476
A Data Resource for Blood and Marrow Transplants and Adoptive Cellular Therapy Research National Marrow Donor Program $1,000
Follow-up of mTBI Patients Discharged From the ED Using Standard Clinical Triage Including BrainScope One BrainScope Company, Inc. $542

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Barnes Jewish Hospital

Is Barnes Jewish Hospital a good hospital?

Barnes Jewish Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Barnes Jewish Hospital?

79% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 7,124 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Barnes Jewish Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 37 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 7% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Barnes Jewish Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $670,258 in payments to Barnes Jewish Hospital for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.