USCareCheck

CMS certification 260141

University of Missouri Health Care

One Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University of Missouri Health Care has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 42 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 71% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,680 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 2 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,680 completed surveys, 27% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
71%
MO 71% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
65%
MO 72% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
75%
MO 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
74%
MO 79% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
MO 61% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
MO 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
65%
MO 73% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
59%
MO 61% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Missouri average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital MO US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 412 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 42 min 2 h 35 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 21 visits sampled 3 h 2 min 4 h 23 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 137,401 patients 2% 3% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 159 patients 39% 63% 65%

How University of Missouri Health Care compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University of Missouri Health CareThis hospital3/571%3 h 42 min2 better 3 worse
Boone Hospital CenterSame city4/578%2 h 55 min4 better 2 worse
Columbia Mo VA Medical CenterSame city4/586%—3 worse
Moberly Regional Medical CenterSame ZIP area · Moberly2/564%1 h 54 minNo different

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Columbia.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 5,480 cases Too few cases 4.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 195 cases Too few cases 11.3% 11.9%
Heart failure 400 cases Too few cases 13.2% 11.1%
Pneumonia 482 cases Too few cases 13.3% 15.2%
Stroke 608 cases Too few cases 12.4% 11.9%
COPD 268 cases Too few cases 9.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 57 cases Too few cases 3.6% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.79 likely 0.55 – 1.04 1
After hip or knee replacement 102 cases Too few cases 6.4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 170 cases No different 162.66 per 1,000 likely 121.19 per 1,000 – 204.12 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,975 cases Better 0.09 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.62 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 9,221 cases No different 0.15 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 9,477 cases No different 0.29 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,879 cases No different 1.86 per 1,000 likely 0.63 per 1,000 – 3.1 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,536 cases No different 1.05 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.42 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,388 cases No different 7.7 per 1,000 likely 2.81 per 1,000 – 12.59 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,043 cases Worse 5.55 per 1,000 likely 3.91 per 1,000 – 7.19 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,448 cases No different 3.59 per 1,000 likely 0.7 per 1,000 – 6.48 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 594 cases No different 1.66 per 1,000 likely 0.3 per 1,000 – 3.01 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,928 cases No different 1.23 per 1,000 likely 0.36 per 1,000 – 2.1 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.47 likely 0.27 – 0.77 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.43 likely 0.26 – 0.68 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.77 likely 0.39 – 1.36 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.67 likely 0.11 – 2.22 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.76 likely 0.42 – 1.27 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.41 likely 0.31 – 0.54 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 344 cases Too few cases 14.4% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 786 cases Too few cases 22.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 844 cases Too few cases 16.8% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 575 cases Too few cases 21.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 65 cases Too few cases 11.7% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 103 cases Too few cases 5.6% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 233 cases Too few cases 11.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 447 cases Too few cases 28.4 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 518 cases Too few cases -5.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,042 cases No different 13.3 per 1,000 likely 10.2 per 1,000 – 17.3 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 438 cases No different 11.7 per 100 likely 9.5 per 100 – 14.3 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 438 cases No different 5.5 per 100 likely 4.1 per 100 – 7.3 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,629 cases No different 0.8 likely 0.7 – 1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $70.8M general $65.1M · research $5.7M
All years, 2019–2025 $187.3M 5,088 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 93 89 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $9.8M
  • 2020 $6.9M
  • 2021 $11.5M
  • 2022 $10M
  • 2023 $11M
  • 2024 $67.4M
  • 2025 $70.8M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $64.4M 336
Grants $544,015 27
Space rental and facility fees $155,682 70
Education $12,387 4
Debt forgiveness $8,388 7
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $6,910 1
Charitable contributions $5,150 1
Royalties and licensing fees $3,000 1
Consulting fees $2,912 2

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Advanced Accelerator Applications $64.3M 331
Synthes USA Products LLC $3.6M 2
Elite Orthopedics, LLC $324,882 1
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $282,936 10
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $249,372 37
Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $127,512 5
Abbvie INC. $125,297 20
Eli Lilly and Company $113,265 4

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Prevention of Proximal Femoral Fracture with Prophylactic Calcar Screw Fixation in Distal Femur Fracture: A Biomechanical Study Synthes USA Products LLC $3.6M
A Phase III, Open-label, Randomised Study of Neoadjuvant Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato DXd) Plus Durvalumab Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab With or Wi… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $154,233
Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Low… Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $127,512
ACCELERATE a Multisite Prospective Hybrid (Effectiveness-implementation) Type 2 Design, Single-arm, Mixed-methods Study of a Simplified Accelerated A… Gilead Sciences, Inc. $101,000
EMBER-4: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3 STUDY OF ADJUVANT IMLUNESTRANT VS STANDARD ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECE… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT05514054 $93,835
A Phase 3, Open-label Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of VX-121 Combination Therapy in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED $82,500
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Milvexian, an Oral … Janssen Research & Development, LLC $66,631
A Study in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) With Anhedonia and Inadequate Response to Current Antidepressant Therapy Including a Sel… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $60,996

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University of Missouri Health Care

Is University of Missouri Health Care a good hospital?

University of Missouri Health Care has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University of Missouri Health Care?

71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,680 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University of Missouri Health Care emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 42 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University of Missouri Health Care receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $70.8M in payments to University of Missouri Health Care for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.