USCareCheck

CMS certification 280060

Chi Health Bergan Mercy

7500 Mercy Rd, Omaha, NE 68124

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Chi Health Bergan Mercy has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 62% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 36 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 62% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 589 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 24 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 589 completed surveys, 18% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
62%
NE 78% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
66%
NE 79% · US 72% · 2 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
75%
NE 84% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
75%
NE 84% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
56%
NE 66% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
89%
NE 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
63%
NE 78% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
54%
NE 69% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Nebraska average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NE US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 345 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 36 min 1 h 53 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 24 visits sampled 4 h 16 min 2 h 41 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 63,152 patients 4% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 143 patients 63% 64% 65%

How Chi Health Bergan Mercy compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Chi Health Bergan MercyThis hospital4/562%2 h 36 min4 better 1 worse
Chi Health ImmanuelSame city3/563%2 h 8 min3 better 1 worse
Nebraska Spine Hospital, LLCSame cityNot rated85%—No different
Chi Health LakesideSame city4/563%2 h 59 min3 better
Midwest Surgical Hospital LLCSame cityNot rated87%—1 worse
The Nebraska Methodist HospitalSame city4/584%2 h 36 min5 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Omaha.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,703 cases Too few cases 3.5% 3.9%
Heart attack 136 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 311 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 196 cases Too few cases 15.5% 15.2%
Stroke 290 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11.9%
COPD 51 cases Too few cases 8.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 76 cases Too few cases 3.4% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.99 likely 0.72 – 1.26 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 131 cases No different 196.99 per 1,000 likely 153.73 per 1,000 – 240.24 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 5,151 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.86 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 5,971 cases No different 0.35 per 1,000 likely 0.15 per 1,000 – 0.55 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 6,065 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,773 cases No different 1.88 per 1,000 likely 0.51 per 1,000 – 3.25 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 730 cases No different 2.38 per 1,000 likely 0.97 per 1,000 – 3.79 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 775 cases No different 10.56 per 1,000 likely 5.68 per 1,000 – 15.44 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,826 cases No different 4.23 per 1,000 likely 2.33 per 1,000 – 6.13 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 746 cases No different 5.15 per 1,000 likely 2.04 per 1,000 – 8.25 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 298 cases No different 1.56 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 3 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,299 cases No different 0.94 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 1.86 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.46 likely 0.15 – 1.12 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.14 likely 0.02 – 0.47 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 1.01 likely 0.44 – 1.99 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.21 likely 0.11 – 0.37 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 232 cases Too few cases 16.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 508 cases Too few cases 21.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 320 cases Too few cases 17.6% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 98 cases Too few cases 19.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 69 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 196 cases Too few cases -16.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 384 cases Too few cases 9.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 201 cases Too few cases 7.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 616 cases No different 11.2 per 1,000 likely 8.4 per 1,000 – 15 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 96 cases No different 10.7 per 100 likely 7.8 per 100 – 14.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 96 cases No different 5 per 100 likely 3.3 per 100 – 7.4 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 403 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.3 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

322 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 11 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 65
Hospitalist 30
Anesthesiology 24
Nurse Practitioner 22
Diagnostic Radiology 15
Acute Care 14
Emergency Medicine 14
Neonatal 14
Neonatal, Critical Care 14
Family 13
Internal Medicine 11
Physician Assistant 10

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $7,764 general $254 · research $7,510
All years, 2019–2025 $282,204 124 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 3 5 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $19,566
  • 2020 $103,011
  • 2021 $96,204
  • 2022 $35,689
  • 2023 $16,646
  • 2024 $3,325
  • 2025 $7,764

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Debt forgiveness $232 1
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $23 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,019 1
Uromedica, Incorporated $2,661 1
Medtronic, Inc. $830 1
Olympus America Inc. $232 1
Stryker Corporation $23 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Dapagliflozin in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,019
Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT) for the Treatment of Female SUI Uromedica, Incorporated · NCT04248283 $2,661
PELE IDE Medtronic, Inc. $830

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Chi Health Bergan Mercy

Is Chi Health Bergan Mercy a good hospital?

Chi Health Bergan Mercy has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Chi Health Bergan Mercy?

62% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 589 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Chi Health Bergan Mercy emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 36 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 4% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Chi Health Bergan Mercy receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $7,764 in payments to Chi Health Bergan Mercy for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.