USCareCheck

CMS certification 300034

Catholic Medical Center

100 McGregor Street, Manchester, NH 03102

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Catholic Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 41 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 66% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 713 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 5 better of 26 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 713 completed surveys, 24% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
66%
NH 73% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
67%
NH 73% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
NH 82% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
NH 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
60%
NH 64% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
NH 90% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
66%
NH 76% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
51%
NH 54% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New Hampshire average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as medium; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NH US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 375 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 2 h 45 min 3 h 41 min 2 h 5 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 24 visits sampled 8 h 48 min 3 h 54 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 30,402 patients 1% 3% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 146 patients 48% 58% 65%

How Catholic Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Catholic Medical CenterThis hospital4/566%3 h 41 min5 better 3 worse
Elliot HospitalSame city2/578%4 h 51 min2 better 1 worse
Southern Nh Medical CenterSame county · Nashua2/571%3 h 38 min2 better 2 worse
St Joseph HospitalSame county · Nashua4/570%3 h 22 min4 better
Monadnock Community HospitalSame county · Peterborough2/568%2 h 16 min1 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Manchester.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,665 cases Too few cases 2.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 386 cases Too few cases 10.1% 11.9%
Heart failure 605 cases Too few cases 9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 387 cases Too few cases 11.1% 15.2%
Stroke 153 cases Too few cases 13.5% 11.9%
COPD 126 cases Too few cases 7.8% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 232 cases Too few cases 1.6% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 worse than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.39 likely 1.11 – 1.67 1
After hip or knee replacement 48 cases Too few cases 3.7% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 102 cases No different 191.15 per 1,000 likely 142.07 per 1,000 – 240.23 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 5,479 cases Worse 1.94 per 1,000 likely 1.28 per 1,000 – 2.59 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 7,177 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 7,656 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,970 cases No different 2.59 per 1,000 likely 1.25 per 1,000 – 3.93 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,046 cases No different 1.4 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 2.66 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,077 cases No different 9.43 per 1,000 likely 4.8 per 1,000 – 14.06 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,272 cases No different 2.75 per 1,000 likely 0.8 per 1,000 – 4.71 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,055 cases No different 6.73 per 1,000 likely 3.47 per 1,000 – 10 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 315 cases No different 1.55 per 1,000 likely 0.11 per 1,000 – 2.99 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 929 cases No different 1.08 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 2.05 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.56 likely 0.14 – 1.52 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.36 likely 0.02 – 1.76 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.62 likely 0.37 – 0.97 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 564 cases Too few cases 12.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 778 cases Too few cases 24.1% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 493 cases Too few cases 19.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 178 cases Too few cases 21.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 203 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 50 cases Too few cases 5.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 489 cases Too few cases -9.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 750 cases Too few cases 0.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 416 cases Too few cases 16.2 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,346 cases No different 11.3 per 1,000 likely 8.7 per 1,000 – 14.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 65 cases No different 9.6 per 100 likely 6.7 per 100 – 13.5 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 65 cases No different 5.2 per 100 likely 3.3 per 100 – 8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 440 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.8 – 1.4 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

166 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Practitioner 17
Cardiovascular Disease 16
Internal Medicine 16
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 15
Emergency Medicine 11
Dietitian, Registered 10
Family 10
Physician Assistant 9
Acute Care 6
Pharmacist 6
Medical 5
Anesthesiology 4

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $70,858 general $35,126 · research $35,732
All years, 2019–2025 $1.6M 544 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 2 6 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $379,398
  • 2020 $302,259
  • 2021 $229,153
  • 2022 $276,478
  • 2023 $183,722
  • 2024 $115,557
  • 2025 $70,858

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $30,000 4
Debt forgiveness $5,126 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $30,000 4
M.A. Med Alliance S.A. $22,537 1
Medtronic, Inc. $13,195 1
B. Braun Medical Inc. $2,761 1
Haemonetics Corporation $2,000 1
Aesculap, Inc. $365 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Prospective Randomized Single Blind Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the SELUTION SLR 014 Drug Eluting Balloon in the Tr… M.A. Med Alliance S.A. $22,537
EXPAND II Medtronic, Inc. $13,195

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Catholic Medical Center

Is Catholic Medical Center a good hospital?

Catholic Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Catholic Medical Center?

66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 713 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Catholic Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 41 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with medium patient volume, like this one, the median is 2 h 45 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Catholic Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $70,858 in payments to Catholic Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.