USCareCheck

CMS certification 380061

Providence Portland Medical Center

4805 NE Glisan Street, Portland, OR 97213

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Providence Portland Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 77% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 35 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 77% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 443 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 3 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 443 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
77%
OR 74% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
71%
OR 73% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
OR 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
OR 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
65%
OR 65% · US 62% · 4 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
OR 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
66%
OR 75% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
54%
OR 57% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Oregon average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital OR US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 371 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 35 min 2 h 36 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 36 visits sampled 4 h 44 min 3 h 42 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 62,367 patients 4% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 19 patients 74% 68% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 145 patients 57% 60% 65%

How Providence Portland Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Providence Portland Medical CenterThis hospital4/577%3 h 35 min3 better
Adventist Health PortlandSame city4/571%3 h 25 min3 better
Legacy Good Samaritan Medical CenterSame city4/574%3 h 3 min2 better
Providence St Vincent Medical CenterSame city4/579%3 h 50 min5 better 2 worse
Legacy Emanuel Medical CenterSame city3/574%2 h 50 min1 better 3 worse
Ohsu Hospital and ClinicsSame city3/576%3 h 44 min3 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Portland.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,878 cases Too few cases 3.2% 3.9%
Heart attack 147 cases Too few cases 11.5% 11.9%
Heart failure 313 cases Too few cases 11.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 211 cases Too few cases 14.5% 15.2%
Stroke 520 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
COPD 71 cases Too few cases 8.8% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.92 likely 0.65 – 1.18 1
After hip or knee replacement 105 cases Too few cases 4.5% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 108 cases No different 154.26 per 1,000 likely 111.52 per 1,000 – 197 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 5,053 cases No different 0.4 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.97 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 5,800 cases No different 0.15 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.35 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 6,223 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,966 cases No different 2.13 per 1,000 likely 0.81 per 1,000 – 3.45 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,168 cases No different 1.73 per 1,000 likely 0.32 per 1,000 – 3.14 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 945 cases No different 6.68 per 1,000 likely 1.32 per 1,000 – 12.05 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,035 cases No different 3.49 per 1,000 likely 1.71 per 1,000 – 5.28 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,086 cases No different 7.18 per 1,000 likely 4.33 per 1,000 – 10.03 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 710 cases No different 1.68 per 1,000 likely 0.32 per 1,000 – 3.05 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,774 cases No different 1.23 per 1,000 likely 0.42 per 1,000 – 2.04 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.47 likely 0.21 – 0.93 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.91 likely 0.48 – 1.57 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.76 likely 0.35 – 1.44 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.49 likely 0.03 – 2.43 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.92 likely 0.43 – 1.75 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.32 likely 0.19 – 0.5 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 342 cases Too few cases 15.7% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 967 cases Too few cases 22% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 596 cases Too few cases 17.4% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 267 cases Too few cases 21.5% 20%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 122 cases Too few cases 5.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 160 cases Too few cases -11.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 342 cases Too few cases 6.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 212 cases Too few cases -18.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 374 cases No different 14.1 per 1,000 likely 10.7 per 1,000 – 19.1 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 401 cases No different 9.4 per 100 likely 7.4 per 100 – 11.9 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 401 cases Better 3.3 per 100 likely 2.4 per 100 – 4.7 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 461 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.8 – 1.4 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

400 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 55
Hospitalist 37
Physical Therapist 24
Emergency Medicine 21
Dietitian, Registered 18
Family 16
Surgery 16
Occupational Therapist 14
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 10
Radiation Oncology 10
Registered Nurse 9
Speech-Language Pathologist 9

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $10.1M general $98,090 · research $10M
All years, 2019–2025 $68.2M 4,208 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 98 45 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $5.7M
  • 2020 $7.1M
  • 2021 $8M
  • 2022 $10.5M
  • 2023 $14.9M
  • 2024 $11.9M
  • 2025 $10.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $48,850 21
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $35,967 20
Speaking, teaching and other services $12,995 5
Honoraria $279 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Pfizer INC. $5.6M 117
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $1.1M 19
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $711,323 13
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $521,188 52
Eli Lilly and Company $321,664 5
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $283,561 33
Medtronic, Inc. $201,759 19
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $154,395 14

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
ENCORAFENIBBINIMETINIB WITH OR WITHOUT NIVOLUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BRAF V600 MUTANT THYROID CANCER PFIZER INC. $3.9M
TALAPRO3 A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED DOUBLEBLIND STUDY OF TALAZOPARIB WITH ENZALUTAMIDE VERSUS PLACEBO WITH ENZALUTAMIDE IN MEN WITH DDR GENE MUTATED METAST… PFIZER INC. $729,660
Study of patients with incurable solid tumors undergoing T-cell receptor gene therapy targeting oncogenic driver mutations (neoantigens) AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $523,633
An Open-label, Randomized Phase 3 Study of MK-2870 as a Single Agent and in Combination with Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician s Choice in … Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $379,481
A Phase 1 First inhuman Open Label Dose Escalation Study of JNJ61186372 a Human Bispecific EGFR and cMet Antibody in Subjects with Advanced Non Small… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $317,977
AN OPENLABEL MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF FIRSTLINE ENCORAFENIB PLUS CETUXIMAB WITH OR WITHOUT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE THERAP… PFIZER INC. $288,441
AN OPEN-LABEL, DOSE ESCALATION, PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF TAK-676 AS A SINGLE AGE… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. · NCT04420884 $247,378
A PHASE 1AB OPENLABEL MASTER STUDY OF PF07799544 AS A SINGLEAGENT AND IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER TARGETED AGENTS IN PARTICIPANTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID T… PFIZER INC. $242,424

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Providence Portland Medical Center

Is Providence Portland Medical Center a good hospital?

Providence Portland Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Providence Portland Medical Center?

77% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 443 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Providence Portland Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 35 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 4% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Providence Portland Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $10.1M in payments to Providence Portland Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.