USCareCheck

CMS certification 380091

Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center

10180 SE Sunnyside Road, Clackamas, OR 97015

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 15 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none.

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 71% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 3,641 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 3 better of 15 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 3,641 completed surveys, 27% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
71%
OR 74% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
68%
OR 73% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
OR 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
80%
OR 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
OR 65% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
89%
OR 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
62%
OR 75% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
47%
OR 57% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Oregon average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital OR US
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 663 patients 79% 60% 65%

How Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Kaiser Sunnyside Medical CenterThis hospital4/571%—3 better
Providence Willamette Falls Medical CenterSame county · Oregon City4/568%3 h 58 min1 better
Providence Milwaukie HospitalSame county · Milwaukie3/569%2 h 54 min2 better 1 worse
Legacy Mount Hood Medical CenterSame ZIP area · Gresham3/568%2 h 34 min1 better 1 worse
Providence Hood River Memorial HospitalSame ZIP area · Hood River4/584%1 h 43 min1 better 1 worse
Mid-Columbia Medical CenterSame ZIP area · The Dalles4/557%2 h 6 min2 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,601 cases Too few cases 3% 3.9%
Heart attack 53 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 33 cases Too few cases 11.2% 11.1%
Pneumonia 48 cases Too few cases 14.6% 15.2%
Stroke 554 cases Too few cases 11.2% 11.9%

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.36 likely 0.95 – 1.77 1
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 1,198 cases Worse 2.16 per 1,000 likely 1.21 per 1,000 – 3.1 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 1,542 cases No different 0.31 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.54 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 1,571 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 396 cases No different 2.3 per 1,000 likely 0.69 per 1,000 – 3.9 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 137 cases No different 1.58 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.26 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 130 cases No different 7.1 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 15.97 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 422 cases No different 3.35 per 1,000 likely 0.94 per 1,000 – 5.77 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 136 cases No different 4.69 per 1,000 likely 0.58 per 1,000 – 8.8 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 79 cases No different 1.72 per 1,000 likely 0.2 per 1,000 – 3.23 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 315 cases No different 0.97 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.03 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.18 likely 0.01 – 0.9 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 1.32 likely 0.72 – 2.25 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.13 likely 0.46 – 2.35 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.22 likely 0.01 – 1.07 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.37 likely 0.23 – 0.55 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 587 cases Too few cases 13.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 885 cases Too few cases 21% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 577 cases Too few cases 17.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 177 cases Too few cases 19% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 162 cases Too few cases 10.3% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 54 cases Too few cases -32.1 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 43 cases Too few cases -31.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 46 cases Too few cases -75.7 days per 100 —

6 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

760 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Emergency Medicine 90
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 84
Internal Medicine 61
Diagnostic Radiology 46
Anesthesiology 34
Physical Therapist 32
Clinical 31
Pharmacist 29
Pharmacist Clinician (PhC)/ Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 21
Respiratory Therapist, Registered 21
Speech-Language Pathologist 20
Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) 18

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $938,978 general $11,135 · research $927,843
All years, 2019–2025 $3.6M 397 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 14 10 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $248,910
  • 2020 $131,262
  • 2021 $468,251
  • 2022 $892,036
  • 2023 $356,611
  • 2024 $538,732
  • 2025 $938,978

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $9,026 1
Debt forgiveness $1,443 1
Education $667 2

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $252,488 72
Genentech, Inc. $193,625 17
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $140,029 2
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $130,641 30
Genmab U.S., Inc. $102,973 20
Abbvie INC. $84,877 16
Adc Therapeutics America, INC. $23,211 6
Medtronic, Inc. $9,026 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Mosunetuzumab Monotherapy in Participants With Select B-Cell Malignancies (MorningSu… Genentech, Inc. $166,976
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Randomized, Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination With Sacituzumab … Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $140,029
AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF LINVOSELTAMAB (REGN5458; ANTI- BCMA X ANTI-CD3 BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY) VERSUS THE COMBINATION OF ELOTUZUMAB,… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT05730036 $131,045
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal OTX-TKI (Ocular Therapeutix) (axitinib Implant) in Subjects with Neovascular Age-Related Ma… Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $130,641
A First-in-Human, Open-label, Dose-escalation Trial With Expansion Cohorts to Evaluate Safety of GEN1042 in Subjects With Malignant Solid Tumors. Genmab U.S., Inc. $102,973
A PHASE 3 STUDY OF FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS OF FIANLIMAB AND CEMIPLIMAB VERSUS RELATLIMAB AND NIVOLUMAB IN PARTICIPANTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATI… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT06246916 $85,420
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine With Bevacizumab Versus Bevacizumab as Maintenance in Platinum-sensitive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer (GLO… ABBVIE INC. · NCT05445778 $38,066
A PHASE 2 PERI-OPERATIVE TRIAL OF FIANLIMAB AND CEMIPLIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS CEMIPLIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH CHEMOTHERAPY IN PAT… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT06161441 $36,023

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center

Is Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center a good hospital?

Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 15 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center?

71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 3,641 completed HCAHPS surveys.

Does Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center have an emergency room?

Yes. CMS lists emergency services at Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center.

Does Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $938,978 in payments to Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.