CMS certification 390164
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside
200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 54 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).
Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.
What patients said
Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 612 completed surveys, 26% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
Emergency department
How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
| Measure | This hospital | PA | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 554 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min | 3 h 54 min | 3 h 6 min | 2 h 42 min |
| Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 25 visits sampled | 4 h 49 min | 4 h 57 min | 4 h 17 min |
| Left before being seen Lower is better · 93,028 patients | 1% | 2% | 2% |
| Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 389 patients | 52% | 60% | 65% |
How UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside compares with nearby hospitals
The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.
| Hospital | CMS stars | Would recommend | ER median time | Vs the nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideThis hospital | 4/5 | 72% | 3 h 54 min | 8 better 1 worse |
| Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemSame city | 4/5 | 78% | 3 h 20 min | 1 better 1 worse |
| Allegheny General HospitalSame city | 3/5 | 69% | 4 h 34 min | 4 better |
| UPMC St MargaretSame city | 3/5 | 78% | 3 h 53 min | 1 worse |
| UPMC MercySame city | 4/5 | 72% | 3 h 45 min | 3 better 1 worse |
| West Penn HospitalSame city | 3/5 | 77% | 3 h 28 min | 1 better 2 worse |
Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Pittsburgh.
Deaths
How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| All patients, hospital-wide 8,785 cases | Too few cases | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| Heart attack 156 cases | Too few cases | 11% | 11.9% |
| Heart failure 423 cases | Too few cases | 7.6% | 11.1% |
| Pneumonia 391 cases | Too few cases | 12% | 15.2% |
| Stroke 718 cases | Too few cases | 8.7% | 11.9% |
| COPD 92 cases | Too few cases | 7% | 8.6% |
| Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 136 cases | Too few cases | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Complications
How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious complications, combined measure | Worse | 1.4 likely 1.22 – 1.57 | 1 |
| After hip or knee replacement 387 cases | Too few cases | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 391 cases | No different | 167.94 per 1,000 likely 137.62 per 1,000 – 198.26 per 1,000 | 173.3 per 1,000 |
| Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 11,546 cases | Worse | 1.84 per 1,000 likely 1.45 per 1,000 – 2.22 per 1,000 | 0.63 per 1,000 |
| Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 13,123 cases | No different | 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 | 0.21 per 1,000 |
| Broken bones from falls in the hospital 14,320 cases | No different | 0.39 per 1,000 likely 0.23 per 1,000 – 0.56 per 1,000 | 0.27 per 1,000 |
| Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 4,417 cases | No different | 2.3 per 1,000 likely 1.31 per 1,000 – 3.29 per 1,000 | 2.34 per 1,000 |
| Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 2,630 cases | No different | 1.71 per 1,000 likely 0.65 per 1,000 – 2.78 per 1,000 | 1.67 per 1,000 |
| Breathing failure after surgery 2,469 cases | No different | 10.58 per 1,000 likely 7.41 per 1,000 – 13.74 per 1,000 | 9.42 per 1,000 |
| Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 4,999 cases | No different | 3.15 per 1,000 likely 1.9 per 1,000 – 4.41 per 1,000 | 3.52 per 1,000 |
| Sepsis after surgery 2,617 cases | No different | 5.69 per 1,000 likely 3.73 per 1,000 – 7.65 per 1,000 | 5.27 per 1,000 |
| Surgical wound splitting open 1,552 cases | No different | 1.84 per 1,000 likely 0.67 per 1,000 – 3.01 per 1,000 | 1.77 per 1,000 |
| Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,065 cases | No different | 0.9 per 1,000 likely 0.25 per 1,000 – 1.55 per 1,000 | 1.06 per 1,000 |
Infections caught in the hospital
Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) | Better | 0.76 likely 0.58 – 0.97 | 1 |
| Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) | Better | 0.48 likely 0.36 – 0.64 | 1 |
| Surgical site infections after colon surgery | Better | 0.36 likely 0.17 – 0.65 | 1 |
| MRSA bloodstream infections | No different | 0.86 likely 0.59 – 1.21 | 1 |
| C. diff intestinal infections | Better | 0.6 likely 0.51 – 0.7 | 1 |
1 more measure had too few cases here to report.
Readmissions and return visits
How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Readmitted after a heart attack 664 cases | Too few cases | 15.2% | 14.4% |
| Readmitted after heart failure 1,405 cases | Too few cases | 23.1% | 21.3% |
| Readmitted after pneumonia 1,228 cases | Too few cases | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Readmitted after COPD 439 cases | Too few cases | 19.1% | 20% |
| Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 262 cases | Too few cases | 13.7% | 11% |
| Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 383 cases | Too few cases | 4.6% | 5.8% |
| Days back in hospital after a heart attack 212 cases | Too few cases | -2.8 days per 100 | — |
| Days back in hospital after heart failure 523 cases | Too few cases | -16.5 days per 100 | — |
| Days back in hospital after pneumonia 425 cases | Too few cases | 27.7 days per 100 | — |
| Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 2,561 cases | No different | 11.2 per 1,000 likely 8.8 per 1,000 – 14.2 per 1,000 | 13 per 1,000 |
| Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 213 cases | No different | 8.1 per 100 likely 5.9 per 100 – 10.8 per 100 | 10.7 per 100 |
| ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 213 cases | No different | 4.6 per 100 likely 3.1 per 100 – 6.8 per 100 | 5.4 per 100 |
| Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,016 cases | No different | 1 likely 0.8 – 1.3 | — |
1 more measure had too few cases here to report.
Clinicians registered at this address
1,742 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 409 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.
| Specialty | Clinicians |
|---|---|
| Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered | 201 |
| Specialist | 147 |
| Diagnostic Radiology | 122 |
| Internal Medicine | 108 |
| Pharmacist | 95 |
| Physical Therapist | 82 |
| Physician Assistant | 82 |
| Family | 49 |
| Anesthesiology | 47 |
| Medical | 45 |
| Occupational Therapist | 44 |
| Emergency Medicine | 43 |
First 12 alphabetically
Money from drug and device companies
Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.
- 2019 $2.7M
- 2020 $1.4M
- 2021 $1.4M
- 2022 $3.2M
- 2023 $3.1M
- 2024 $7.2M
- 2025 $3.6M
What the 2025 general payments were for
| Type of payment | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Royalties and licensing fees | $494,541 | 2 |
| Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan | $428,077 | 81 |
| Consulting fees | $148,000 | 10 |
| Grants | $104,952 | 7 |
| Space rental and facility fees | $86,415 | 19 |
| Speaking, teaching and other services | $80,000 | 52 |
| Gifts | $4,925 | 1 |
Largest paying companies, 2025
| Company | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $1.1M | 12 |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | $518,999 | 1 |
| Ge Healthcare | $494,541 | 2 |
| Intuitive Surgical, INC. | $366,285 | 21 |
| Incyte Corporation | $267,160 | 104 |
| Elekta Instrument AB | $148,000 | 10 |
| Abbvie INC. | $135,647 | 1 |
| Gilead Sciences, Inc. | $102,352 | 5 |
Largest research studies funded here, 2025
| Study | Amount |
|---|---|
| A Multicenter, Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study Of TNB-486, A Bispecific Antibody Targeting CD19 in Subjects with relapsed or… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $680,771 |
| STUDY NAME#Safety and efficacy of anti-CD47, ALX148 in combination with liposomal doxorubicin and pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent platinum-r… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | $518,999 |
| A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Axatilimab in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Graft-Versus-H… Incyte Corporation | $212,750 |
| A phase II evaluation of maintenance therapy combination Mirvetuximab Soravtansine and Olaparib in Recurrent Platinum Sensitive Ovarian, Peritoneal, … ABBVIE INC. | $135,647 |
| An Open-label, Phase 1, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Anti-tumor activity of N0112 in Human Leukocyte Antigen-C0802-Positi… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $103,755 |
| Screening Breast MRI with Gadopiclenol Bracco Diagnostics Inc. | $75,000 |
| A Phase III Multicentre Randomised Double blind Chronic dosing Parallel group Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dos… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $65,125 |
| A Multicenter,Randomized,Double blind,Placebo controlled,Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adult Patients with Sy… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $45,393 |
Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.
How to read this page
- Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
- “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
- Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
- Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
- These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.
CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error
Common questions about UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside
Is UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside a good hospital?
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.
Would patients recommend UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside?
72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 612 completed HCAHPS surveys.
How long is the wait in the UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside emergency room?
Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 54 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
Does UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside receive money from drug and device companies?
Drug and device makers reported $3.6M in payments to UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.