USCareCheck

CMS certification 430016

Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center

1325 S Cliff Ave Post Office Box 5045, Sioux Falls, SD 57117

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 76% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 1 h 52 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 76% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 711 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 5 better of 24 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 711 completed surveys, 28% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
76%
SD 77% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
74%
SD 77% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
78%
SD 83% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
79%
SD 85% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
62%
SD 68% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
SD 88% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
64%
SD 77% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
61%
SD 70% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital South Dakota average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital SD US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 388 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 1 h 52 min 1 h 55 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 21 visits sampled 1 h 22 min 2 h 27 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 53,764 patients 0% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 14 patients 71% 58% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 139 patients 63% 67% 65%

How Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health CenterThis hospital4/576%1 h 52 min5 better 1 worse
Sanford Usd Medical CenterSame city5/574%3 h 27 min9 better
Sioux Falls VA Medical CenterSame city5/590%—2 better
Avera Heart Hospital of South DakotaSame city5/588%1 h 50 min2 better
Sioux Falls Specialty HospitalSame cityNot rated82%—1 better
Avera Dells Area Hospital - CahSame county · Dell RapidsNot rated86%1 h 46 minNo different

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Sioux Falls.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,735 cases Too few cases 3.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 32 cases Too few cases 12.2% 11.9%
Heart failure 332 cases Too few cases 12.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 560 cases Too few cases 14.8% 15.2%
Stroke 535 cases Too few cases 10.9% 11.9%
COPD 167 cases Too few cases 8.1% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.03 likely 0.79 – 1.28 1
After hip or knee replacement 174 cases Too few cases 4.9% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 158 cases No different 170.45 per 1,000 likely 130.76 per 1,000 – 210.13 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 8,718 cases No different 1.04 per 1,000 likely 0.54 per 1,000 – 1.54 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 10,545 cases No different 0.14 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.33 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 10,666 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,115 cases No different 2.21 per 1,000 likely 0.97 per 1,000 – 3.44 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,698 cases No different 1.08 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.47 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,683 cases No different 8 per 1,000 likely 3.01 per 1,000 – 12.99 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,245 cases No different 3.35 per 1,000 likely 1.75 per 1,000 – 4.94 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,581 cases No different 5.26 per 1,000 likely 2.49 per 1,000 – 8.04 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 954 cases No different 1.72 per 1,000 likely 0.34 per 1,000 – 3.1 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,910 cases No different 1.13 per 1,000 likely 0.35 per 1,000 – 1.91 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.78 likely 0.4 – 1.38 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.23 likely 0.07 – 0.55 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.37 likely 0.12 – 0.9 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.53 likely 0.03 – 2.59 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.66 likely 0.31 – 1.25 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.32 likely 0.2 – 0.49 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after heart failure 398 cases Too few cases 21.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 739 cases Too few cases 17.5% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 251 cases Too few cases 21.1% 20%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 148 cases Too few cases 6.2% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after heart failure 365 cases Too few cases 20.1 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 654 cases Too few cases -3.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 4,024 cases No different 14.5 per 1,000 likely 11.9 per 1,000 – 17.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 544 cases No different 9.5 per 100 likely 7.7 per 100 – 11.8 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 544 cases No different 5.5 per 100 likely 4.2 per 100 – 7.2 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,535 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.8 – 1.1 —

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $4.1M general $181,015 · research $4M
All years, 2019–2025 $13M 1,462 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 67 53 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $791,269
  • 2020 $1.8M
  • 2021 $984,941
  • 2022 $1.4M
  • 2023 $1.3M
  • 2024 $2.6M
  • 2025 $4.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $66,300 6
Debt forgiveness $35,249 3
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $27,509 8
Space rental and facility fees $24,500 22
Speaking, teaching and other services $24,457 8
Education $2,000 2
Gifts $1,000 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Amgen Inc. $1M 4
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $510,240 35
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $475,719 12
Genentech, Inc. $441,591 46
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $380,588 11
AstraZeneca UK Limited $214,082 2
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $181,011 28
Pfizer INC. $140,784 25

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity of Subcutaneous Tarlatamab in Subjects Wi… Amgen Inc. $499,911
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Tarlatamab in Combination With Carboplatin, Etoposide, and PD-L1 Inhibitor in Subje… Amgen Inc. $455,837
TAK-280-1501 Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $312,201
Ph3 study of Pola R CHP Glofit vs PolaR CHP in 1L DLBCL Genentech, Inc. $198,817
CAMBRIA-2 A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Camizestrant (AZD9833, a Next Generation, Oral Selective Est… AstraZeneca UK Limited $194,532
Multi-arm Phase 2 Study of Ubamatamab (REGN4018; MUC16CD3 Bispecific Antibody) With or Without Additional Agents in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT06787612 $181,011
A PHASE 1/2, FIRST-IN-HUMAN, OPEN LABEL, DOSE ESCALATION STUDY OF MVC-101, AN EGFR X CD3 CONDITIONAL BISPECIFIC REDIRECTED ACTIVATION (COBRATM) PROTE… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $167,801
a phase 3b,randomized,multicenter,open label study to assess the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus pembrolizumab in combination with pl… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $150,340

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center

Is Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center a good hospital?

Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center?

76% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 711 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 1 h 52 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $4.1M in payments to Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.