USCareCheck

CMS certification 450018

University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston

301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 10 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,536 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 4 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,536 completed surveys, 12% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
TX 73% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
73%
TX 74% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
TX 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
76%
TX 80% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
TX 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
TX 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
74%
TX 76% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
65%
TX 66% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Texas average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TX US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 350 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 10 min 2 h 25 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 12 visits sampled 3 h 43 min 3 h 53 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 147,680 patients 0% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 51 patients 94% 67% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 99 patients 35% 68% 65%

How University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University of Texas Medical Branch GalvestonThis hospital3/572%3 h 10 min4 better 3 worse
Chi St Luke's Health BrazosportSame ZIP area · Lake Jackson4/566%2 h 32 min1 worse
HCA Houston Healthcare PearlandSame ZIP area · Pearland3/561%2 h 14 min1 better
Houston Methodist Baytown HospitalSame ZIP area · Baytown5/578%3 h 36 min6 better
HCA Houston Healthcare Clear LakeSame ZIP area · Webster4/560%1 h 58 min3 better 2 worse
Memorial Hermann Houston Physicians HospitalSame ZIP area · WebsterNot rated87%2 h 50 min1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Galveston.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 5,418 cases Too few cases 2.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 239 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 699 cases Too few cases 8.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 632 cases Too few cases 11.9% 15.2%
Stroke 491 cases Too few cases 11% 11.9%
COPD 174 cases Too few cases 8.2% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 75 cases Too few cases 3.1% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.09 likely 0.83 – 1.35 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 120 cases No different 170.64 per 1,000 likely 131.24 per 1,000 – 210.03 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,932 cases No different 0.75 per 1,000 likely 0.24 per 1,000 – 1.26 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 9,148 cases No different 0.3 per 1,000 likely 0.11 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 9,326 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 0.45 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,933 cases No different 2.65 per 1,000 likely 1.35 per 1,000 – 3.96 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 539 cases No different 1.56 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 3.03 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 581 cases No different 9.09 per 1,000 likely 3.52 per 1,000 – 14.65 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,104 cases No different 3.23 per 1,000 likely 1.38 per 1,000 – 5.08 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 590 cases No different 6.77 per 1,000 likely 3.54 per 1,000 – 10.01 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 534 cases No different 1.44 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 2.83 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,573 cases No different 1.49 per 1,000 likely 0.6 per 1,000 – 2.38 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.23 likely 0.09 – 0.48 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.68 likely 0.42 – 1.03 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.89 likely 0.43 – 1.64 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.99 likely 0.63 – 1.49 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.48 likely 0.38 – 0.6 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 459 cases Too few cases 16% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,442 cases Too few cases 22.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,177 cases Too few cases 16.5% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 433 cases Too few cases 20.8% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 141 cases Too few cases 12.5% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 237 cases Too few cases 25 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 798 cases Too few cases 11 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 661 cases Too few cases -0.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,585 cases No different 12.7 per 1,000 likely 9.9 per 1,000 – 16.3 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 90 cases No different 11.3 per 100 likely 8 per 100 – 15.6 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 90 cases No different 6 per 100 likely 3.8 per 100 – 9 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 693 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.7 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,684 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 100 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 194
Anesthesiology 145
Pediatrics 111
Psychiatry 65
Surgery 62
Family 59
Family Medicine 54
Obstetrics & Gynecology 54
Diagnostic Radiology 49
Physician Assistant 39
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 35
Cardiovascular Disease 32

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $4M general $784,953 · research $3.2M
All years, 2019–2025 $47.3M 3,187 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 56 55 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $3.3M
  • 2020 $6M
  • 2021 $9.3M
  • 2022 $10.4M
  • 2023 $10.1M
  • 2024 $4.2M
  • 2025 $4M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Royalties and licensing fees $386,724 13
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $122,529 37
Grants $91,460 6
Debt forgiveness $90,936 29
Consulting fees $40,131 1
Space rental and facility fees $24,500 10
Speaking, teaching and other services $20,023 7
Gifts $7,500 1
Education $840 1
Food and beverage $310 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Pfizer INC. $1.5M 61
Tanabe Pharma America, Inc. $312,665 58
Invivyd Inc $202,397 3
Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $190,304 2
Gilead Sciences, Inc. $180,000 5
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbH $176,434 6
Sysmex America, Inc. $147,657 2
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $133,642 11

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
CON29138 PFIZER INC. $1.1M
Investigation of protective mechanisms of monoclonal antibodies against SARS CoV-2 Invivyd Inc $202,397
UTMB Pre-Clinical Research Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $190,304
Sysmex CN-6000 - Instrument Evaluation Protocol Sysmex America, Inc. $147,657
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of MT-7117 in Adults and Ad… Tanabe Pharma America, Inc. $134,478
A PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED DOUBLEBLIND TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY TOLERABILITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A MULTIVALENT PNEUMOCOCCAL CONJUGATE VACCINE IN HEAL… PFIZER INC. $104,946
A Historical Cohort, Multicenter Study to Characterize the Management, Clinical Course, and Outcomes of Pregnancies in Women Who Have Experienced a P… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $96,490
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Long-term, Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Oral Dersimelagon (MT-7117) in Subjects With Er… Tanabe Pharma America, Inc. $76,969

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston

Is University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston a good hospital?

University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,536 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 10 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $4M in payments to University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.