USCareCheck

CMS certification 450213

University Health System

4502 Medical Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University Health System has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 78% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 6 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 6 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 78% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 2,347 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 6 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,347 completed surveys, 22% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
78%
TX 73% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
77%
TX 74% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
78%
TX 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
79%
TX 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
60%
TX 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
TX 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
76%
TX 76% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
59%
TX 66% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Texas average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TX US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 354 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 6 h 6 min 2 h 25 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 25 visits sampled 7 h 27 min 3 h 53 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 128,672 patients 2% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 712 patients 82% 68% 65%

How University Health System compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University Health SystemThis hospital3/578%6 h 6 min6 better
Methodist HospitalSame city4/567%2 h 18 min7 better 5 worse
San Antonio VA Medical Center (VA South Texas Healthcare System)Same city5/579%—3 better
Baptist Neighborhood Hospital Thousand OaksSame city5/579%1 h 55 minNo different
Foundation Surgical Hospital of San AntonioSame cityNot rated81%—1 worse
Legent Orthopedic + SpineSame cityNot rated83%—No different

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in San Antonio.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,580 cases Too few cases 3.6% 3.9%
Heart attack 85 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 162 cases Too few cases 10.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 185 cases Too few cases 13.3% 15.2%
Stroke 254 cases Too few cases 12.3% 11.9%
COPD 29 cases Too few cases 7.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 40 cases Too few cases 2.9% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.97 likely 0.7 – 1.25 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 136 cases No different 150.43 per 1,000 likely 105.5 per 1,000 – 195.36 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 6,250 cases No different 0.93 per 1,000 likely 0.36 per 1,000 – 1.5 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 6,576 cases No different 0.15 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.36 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 6,682 cases No different 0.21 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 0.4 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,029 cases No different 1.78 per 1,000 likely 0.51 per 1,000 – 3.05 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 678 cases No different 2.22 per 1,000 likely 0.76 per 1,000 – 3.69 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 778 cases No different 6.56 per 1,000 likely 0.92 per 1,000 – 12.2 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,071 cases No different 2.61 per 1,000 likely 0.71 per 1,000 – 4.51 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 759 cases No different 5.58 per 1,000 likely 2.42 per 1,000 – 8.75 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 509 cases No different 2.12 per 1,000 likely 0.7 per 1,000 – 3.55 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,792 cases No different 0.75 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.67 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.39 likely 0.24 – 0.59 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.41 likely 0.25 – 0.61 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.55 likely 0.24 – 1.08 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.36 likely 0.17 – 0.69 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.3 likely 0.23 – 0.38 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 181 cases Too few cases 15.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 405 cases Too few cases 20.6% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 395 cases Too few cases 16.5% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 92 cases Too few cases 18.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 80 cases Too few cases 9.5% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 88 cases Too few cases 8.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 189 cases Too few cases 20.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 197 cases Too few cases -16 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 492 cases No different 13.2 per 1,000 likely 9.8 per 1,000 – 17.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 73 cases No different 10.8 per 100 likely 7.9 per 100 – 14.9 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 73 cases No different 5 per 100 likely 3.3 per 100 – 7.6 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 362 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.8 – 1.5 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,341 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 407 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Hospitalist 171
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 109
Emergency Medicine 108
Anesthesiology 90
Physician Assistant 70
Acute Care 65
Family 58
Diagnostic Radiology 57
Internal Medicine 54
Pediatrics 44
Surgery 26
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 24

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $706,027 general $706,027 · research $0
All years, 2019–2025 $2.8M 320 reported payments
  • 2019 $91,727
  • 2020 $107,272
  • 2021 $65,038
  • 2022 $297,881
  • 2023 $824,360
  • 2024 $733,332
  • 2025 $706,027

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $396,523 4
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $153,695 21
Debt forgiveness $153,014 34
Speaking, teaching and other services $2,200 6
Space rental and facility fees $595 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Gilead Sciences, Inc. $396,523 4
KLS-Martin L.P. $116,979 29
Intuitive Surgical, INC. $113,800 12
AngioDynamics, Inc. $36,083 3
Biotronik INC. $23,560 1
B. Braun Medical Inc. $10,376 1
Pinnacle Biologics, Inc $2,200 6
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $1,608 1

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University Health System

Is University Health System a good hospital?

University Health System has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 6 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University Health System?

78% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,347 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University Health System emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 6 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University Health System receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $706,027 in payments to University Health System for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.