USCareCheck

CMS certification 460001

Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital

1034 North 500 West, Provo, UT 84604

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 82% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 58 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 82% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 1,522 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 7 better of 24 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,522 completed surveys, 27% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
82%
UT 77% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
81%
UT 78% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
81%
UT 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
80%
UT 82% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
60%
UT 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
UT 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
81%
UT 79% · US 74% · 5 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
60%
UT 62% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Utah average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital UT US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 455 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 2 h 58 min 2 h 13 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 31 visits sampled 3 h 45 min 3 h 25 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 49,164 patients 1% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 13 patients 38% 69% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 137 patients 74% 68% 65%

How Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Intermountain Health Utah Valley HospitalThis hospital5/582%2 h 58 min7 better
Mountain View HospitalSame county · Payson5/573%1 h 57 min3 better
Intermountain Health Spanish Fork HospitalSame county · Spanish ForkNot rated80%2 h 32 min1 better
Orem Community HospitalSame county · OremNot rated85%1 h 42 minNo different
Timpanogos Regional HospitalSame county · Orem4/573%1 h 43 min2 better
American Fork HospitalSame county · American Fork4/576%2 h 22 min2 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Provo.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,010 cases Too few cases 3.9% 3.9%
Heart attack 287 cases Too few cases 10.3% 11.9%
Heart failure 339 cases Too few cases 12.3% 11.1%
Pneumonia 332 cases Too few cases 15.3% 15.2%
Stroke 491 cases Too few cases 12.3% 11.9%
COPD 30 cases Too few cases 8.9% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 112 cases Too few cases 2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.77 likely 0.49 – 1.05 1
After hip or knee replacement 81 cases Too few cases 4.3% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 127 cases No different 174.64 per 1,000 likely 130.79 per 1,000 – 218.48 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 4,751 cases No different 0.43 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.03 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 6,015 cases No different 0.18 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.37 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 6,148 cases No different 0.29 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,100 cases No different 2.73 per 1,000 likely 1.36 per 1,000 – 4.11 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 949 cases No different 1.43 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 2.84 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 914 cases No different 6.21 per 1,000 likely 0.74 per 1,000 – 11.68 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,266 cases No different 2.09 per 1,000 likely 0.29 per 1,000 – 3.88 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 920 cases No different 4.73 per 1,000 likely 1.43 per 1,000 – 8.04 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 465 cases No different 1.56 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 3 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,217 cases No different 1.2 per 1,000 likely 0.27 per 1,000 – 2.13 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.18 likely 0.05 – 0.49 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.27 likely 0.09 – 0.66 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.48 likely 0.08 – 1.58 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.33 likely 0.06 – 1.1 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.25 likely 0.13 – 0.42 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 516 cases Too few cases 13.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 585 cases Too few cases 18.7% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 530 cases Too few cases 15.7% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 49 cases Too few cases 20.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 177 cases Too few cases 10.2% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 80 cases Too few cases 5.6% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 342 cases Too few cases -22.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 379 cases Too few cases -44.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 359 cases Too few cases -11.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 665 cases No different 14.5 per 1,000 likely 11 per 1,000 – 19.2 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 46 cases No different 10.7 per 100 likely 7.2 per 100 – 15.7 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 46 cases No different 5.1 per 100 likely 3.1 per 100 – 7.9 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 456 cases No different 1 likely 0.7 – 1.3 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2.1M general $222,352 · research $1.9M
All years, 2019–2025 $7.7M 1,007 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 33 28 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $826,585
  • 2020 $979,795
  • 2021 $899,885
  • 2022 $629,839
  • 2023 $1M
  • 2024 $1.2M
  • 2025 $2.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $124,027 7
Grants $47,650 8
Royalties and licensing fees $38,847 12
Space rental and facility fees $8,650 5
Consulting fees $1,737 1
Debt forgiveness $740 1
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $700 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Eli Lilly and Company $488,234 4
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $322,932 2
United Therapeutics Corporation $313,743 108
Abbott Laboratories $186,736 25
Boston Scientific Corporation $170,072 25
Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. $107,530 7
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $101,745 5
Jenavalve Technology, Inc. $83,222 3

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE EFFECT OF LEPODISIRAN ON THE REDUCTION OF MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCUL… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT06292013 $322,792
A Randomized 2-cohort Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of AZD5305 in Combination with Physicians Choice New Hormonal Agents in Patient… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $189,364
POSTMONARCH: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PHASE 3 STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF ABEMACICLIB PLUS FULVESTRANT TO PLACEBO PLUS FU… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT05169567 $165,442
A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double blind, Parallel group, Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab (MEDI… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $133,568
Ion registry study and IRB fees Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. $107,530
AVANT GUARD Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT06096337 $99,705
A Phase 1 Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of Second Mitochondria… BeiGene, Ltd. · NCT05381909 $98,776
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multinational, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Treprostinil in Subjects With Prog… United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT05943535 $97,610

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital

Is Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital a good hospital?

Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital?

82% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,522 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 58 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2.1M in payments to Intermountain Health Utah Valley Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.