USCareCheck

CMS certification 500014

Providence Regional Medical Center Everett

1321 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Providence Regional Medical Center Everett has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 62% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 62% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 2/5 549 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 5 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 549 completed surveys, 19% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
62%
WA 71% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
58%
WA 70% · US 72% · 2 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
72%
WA 78% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
72%
WA 79% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
55%
WA 61% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
WA 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
61%
WA 74% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
48%
WA 53% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Washington average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital WA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 382 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 6 min 2 h 31 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 36 visits sampled 6 h 6 min 3 h 58 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 80,676 patients 3% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 20 patients 60% 62% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 195 patients 76% 60% 65%

How Providence Regional Medical Center Everett compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Providence Regional Medical Center EverettThis hospital4/562%4 h 6 min5 better 1 worse
Cascade Valley HospitalSame county · Arlington4/567%2 h 51 minNo different
Evergreenhealth MonroeSame county · Monroe3/566%2 h 46 minNo different
Swedish Edmonds HospitalSame county · Edmonds3/561%3 h 7 min1 worse
Island HospitalSame ZIP area · Anacortes4/583%3 h 24 min1 better
Peacehealth St Joseph Medical CenterSame ZIP area · Bellingham4/565%3 h 30 min5 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,479 cases Too few cases 3.2% 3.9%
Heart attack 283 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 508 cases Too few cases 12.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 435 cases Too few cases 17.1% 15.2%
Stroke 728 cases Too few cases 10.6% 11.9%
COPD 162 cases Too few cases 11.2% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 95 cases Too few cases 2.5% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.01 likely 0.75 – 1.27 1
After hip or knee replacement 177 cases Too few cases 4.8% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 100 cases No different 194 per 1,000 likely 143.98 per 1,000 – 244.01 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,004 cases No different 0.82 per 1,000 likely 0.24 per 1,000 – 1.4 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 8,628 cases No different 0.13 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.32 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 8,734 cases Worse 0.49 per 1,000 likely 0.31 per 1,000 – 0.67 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,399 cases No different 1.75 per 1,000 likely 0.43 per 1,000 – 3.07 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,127 cases No different 1.63 per 1,000 likely 0.26 per 1,000 – 2.99 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,099 cases No different 8.83 per 1,000 likely 4.02 per 1,000 – 13.64 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,567 cases No different 2.8 per 1,000 likely 1.01 per 1,000 – 4.59 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,098 cases No different 4.79 per 1,000 likely 1.63 per 1,000 – 7.94 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 439 cases No different 1.76 per 1,000 likely 0.36 per 1,000 – 3.16 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,392 cases No different 1.15 per 1,000 likely 0.24 per 1,000 – 2.06 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 worse than the nation 2 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.58 likely 0.27 – 1.1 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.15 likely 0.03 – 0.51 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 2.24 likely 1.4 – 3.39 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 2.67 likely 0.68 – 7.28 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.61 likely 0.27 – 1.2 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.29 likely 0.19 – 0.42 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 630 cases Too few cases 12.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,105 cases Too few cases 20.1% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 916 cases Too few cases 16.8% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 436 cases Too few cases 20.4% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 153 cases Too few cases 8.8% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 165 cases Too few cases 5.9% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 320 cases Too few cases 4.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 545 cases Too few cases -4.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 422 cases Too few cases 2.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 213 cases No different 12.7 per 1,000 likely 9.6 per 1,000 – 17.2 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 675 cases No different 1 likely 0.7 – 1.2 —

3 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

256 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 60 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 69
Anesthesiology 25
Physician Assistant 19
Physical Therapist 18
Emergency Medicine 17
Occupational Therapist 12
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 10
Emergency Medical Services 8
Nurse Practitioner 8
Surgical 8
Trauma Surgery 8
Hospitalist 7

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $306,420 general $56,450 · research $249,970
All years, 2020–2025 $11.2M 966 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 8 16 companies paid in total
  • 2020 $4.4M
  • 2021 $3.6M
  • 2022 $1.4M
  • 2023 $941,546
  • 2024 $538,493
  • 2025 $306,420

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $47,350 16
Speaking, teaching and other services $6,000 2
Grants $3,100 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Boston Scientific Corporation $208,054 11
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $36,386 4
Abbott Laboratories $10,532 4
Gilead Sciences, Inc. $9,000 3
Abbvie INC. $6,100 2
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,000 2
Sanofi Pasteur INC. $6,000 2
Pfizer INC. $6,000 2

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Contemporary Utilization of Intravascular Imaging Guided PCI in a Community-Based Health Care System Boston Scientific Corporation $198,234
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 as Monotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of Renal Cel… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $26,905
ECLIPSE Abbott Laboratories · NCT03108456 $8,032
CHAMPION-AF Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT04394546 $6,721
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy ,- Pembrolizumab MK-3475 as Neoadjuvant,Adjuvant Therapy for Participant… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $6,481
ACURATE IDE Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT03735667 $3,100
Connect Myeloid: The Myelofibrosis (MF), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Disease Registry. The purpose of the Connec… Celgene Corporation $375
Chemo trastuzumab vs chemo trastuzumab pertuzumab Genentech, Inc. $124

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Providence Regional Medical Center Everett

Is Providence Regional Medical Center Everett a good hospital?

Providence Regional Medical Center Everett has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Providence Regional Medical Center Everett?

62% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 549 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Providence Regional Medical Center Everett emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 3% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Providence Regional Medical Center Everett receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $306,420 in payments to Providence Regional Medical Center Everett for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.