USCareCheck

CMS certification 500058

Kadlec Regional Medical Center

888 Swift Blvd, Richland, WA 99352

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Kadlec Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 47 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 74% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 512 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 4 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 512 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
74%
WA 71% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
72%
WA 70% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
WA 78% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
WA 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
58%
WA 61% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
86%
WA 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
72%
WA 74% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
55%
WA 53% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Washington average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital WA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 355 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 47 min 2 h 31 min 2 h 42 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 95,054 patients 6% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 20 patients 85% 62% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 97 patients 64% 60% 65%

How Kadlec Regional Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Kadlec Regional Medical CenterThis hospital4/574%2 h 47 min4 better 2 worse
Prosser Memorial HospitalSame county · Prosser3/585%1 h 52 min1 better
Trios HealthSame county · Kennewick2/564%2 h 47 min3 worse
Othello Community HospitalSame ZIP area · OthelloNot rated64%——
Providence St Mary Medical CenterSame ZIP area · Walla Walla3/568%2 h 14 min3 better
Lourdes Medical CenterSame ZIP area · Pasco3/567%1 h 57 min1 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Richland.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,050 cases Too few cases 3.2% 3.9%
Heart attack 331 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 680 cases Too few cases 11.3% 11.1%
Pneumonia 793 cases Too few cases 14.3% 15.2%
Stroke 365 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11.9%
COPD 182 cases Too few cases 10.2% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 170 cases Too few cases 2.8% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1 likely 0.75 – 1.25 1
After hip or knee replacement 58 cases Too few cases 4.6% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 139 cases No different 177.7 per 1,000 likely 133.09 per 1,000 – 222.31 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 8,719 cases No different 0.94 per 1,000 likely 0.4 per 1,000 – 1.48 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 10,252 cases No different 0.21 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.4 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 10,511 cases No different 0.28 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.46 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,779 cases No different 2.52 per 1,000 likely 1.29 per 1,000 – 3.75 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,260 cases No different 1.07 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.46 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,260 cases No different 8.57 per 1,000 likely 3.79 per 1,000 – 13.34 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,923 cases No different 2.74 per 1,000 likely 1.04 per 1,000 – 4.44 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,232 cases No different 4.68 per 1,000 likely 1.55 per 1,000 – 7.8 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 573 cases No different 1.48 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 2.88 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,254 cases No different 1.35 per 1,000 likely 0.5 per 1,000 – 2.19 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 5 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.65 likely 0.28 – 1.28 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.83 likely 0.41 – 1.53 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.17 likely 0.61 – 2.03 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.75 likely 0.13 – 2.49 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.95 likely 0.3 – 2.29 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.62 likely 0.4 – 0.91 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 378 cases Too few cases 13.8% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 704 cases Too few cases 20.3% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 729 cases Too few cases 16.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 206 cases Too few cases 18.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 122 cases Too few cases 10.7% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 58 cases Too few cases 5.6% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 369 cases Too few cases -20.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 748 cases Too few cases -10.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 783 cases Too few cases 11 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 974 cases No different 13.6 per 1,000 likely 10.4 per 1,000 – 17.4 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 570 cases No different 10.8 per 100 likely 8.5 per 100 – 13.2 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 570 cases No different 6 per 100 likely 4.5 per 100 – 7.7 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,291 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.9 – 1.3 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

214 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 36
Emergency Medicine 22
Physician Assistant 20
Hospitalist 14
Anesthesiology 11
Diagnostic Radiology 10
Family 10
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 10
Neonatal 9
Critical Care Medicine 8
Pediatrics 7
Pharmacist 7

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $512,486 general $61,499 · research $450,987
All years, 2019–2025 $5.2M 786 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 17 17 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.1M
  • 2020 $1.1M
  • 2021 $734,700
  • 2022 $635,898
  • 2023 $532,752
  • 2024 $580,679
  • 2025 $512,486

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $57,625 49
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $1,652 5
Honoraria $1,442 1
Debt forgiveness $779 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Genentech, Inc. $232,112 18
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $91,628 6
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $77,218 2
Insulet Corporation $48,275 30
Incyte Corporation $28,000 2
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $9,350 19
Abbvie INC. $7,275 1
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $6,895 2

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
T DM1 Atezolizumab in high risk HER2 patients with residual disease Genentech, Inc. $119,535
Phase 3 Mosunetuzumab Lenalidomide in R R Follicular Lymphoma Genentech, Inc. $89,974
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Patient Reported Preference for Subcutaneous Pembrolizumab Coformulated with Hyaluronidase MK-3475A Over Intravenous Pemb… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $83,702
SERENA 4 A Randomised Multicentre Double Blind Phase 3 Study of AZD9833 (an Oral SERD) plus Palbociclib versus Anastrazole plus Palbociclib for the … AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $76,218
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Retifanlimab in Combination With INCAGN02385 (Anti-LAG-3) and INCAGN02390 (Anti-TIM-3) as F… Incyte Corporation $28,000
PH III STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ASTEGOLIMAB IN COPD Genentech, Inc. $18,960
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine Monotherapy in Platinum-Sensitive Epithelial, Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancers (PICCOLO) ABBVIE INC. · NCT05041257 $7,275
A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER S GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $6,895

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Kadlec Regional Medical Center

Is Kadlec Regional Medical Center a good hospital?

Kadlec Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Kadlec Regional Medical Center?

74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 512 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Kadlec Regional Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 47 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 6% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Kadlec Regional Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $512,486 in payments to Kadlec Regional Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.