USCareCheck

CMS certification 030036

Chandler Regional Medical Center

1955 West Frye Road, Chandler, AZ 85224

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Chandler Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 6 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 476 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 6 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 476 completed surveys, 19% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
AZ 68% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
71%
AZ 68% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
82%
AZ 77% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
74%
AZ 76% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
AZ 60% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
AZ 84% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
70%
AZ 70% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
48%
AZ 56% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Arizona average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital AZ US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 378 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 22 min 2 h 56 min 2 h 42 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 71,533 patients 3% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 14 patients 64% 70% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 99 patients 67% 59% 65%

How Chandler Regional Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Chandler Regional Medical CenterThis hospital4/572%2 h 22 min6 better 1 worse
Banner Ocotillo Medical CenterSame city3/574%3 h1 better 2 worse
Banner Gateway Medical CenterSame county · Gilbert3/573%3 h 44 min1 better
Dignity Health Arizona General HospitalSame county · Mesa5/581%1 h 32 min1 better
Honorhealth Four Peaks Medical CenterSame county · Mesa2/560%3 h1 better 1 worse
Arizona Spine and Joint HospitalSame county · MesaNot rated81%—1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Chandler.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 7,774 cases Too few cases 3.4% 3.9%
Heart attack 374 cases Too few cases 13.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 651 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 708 cases Too few cases 15.9% 15.2%
Stroke 753 cases Too few cases 9.8% 11.9%
COPD 195 cases Too few cases 8.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 156 cases Too few cases 2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.07 likely 0.81 – 1.32 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 164 cases No different 160.89 per 1,000 likely 117.72 per 1,000 – 204.05 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 10,445 cases No different 0.44 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.97 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 12,145 cases No different 0.19 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 0.37 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 12,325 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,329 cases No different 2.01 per 1,000 likely 0.78 per 1,000 – 3.24 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,193 cases No different 2.41 per 1,000 likely 0.99 per 1,000 – 3.82 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,206 cases No different 10.65 per 1,000 likely 5.52 per 1,000 – 15.78 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,475 cases Worse 5.19 per 1,000 likely 3.54 per 1,000 – 6.84 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,160 cases No different 4.88 per 1,000 likely 1.69 per 1,000 – 8.08 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 748 cases No different 2.08 per 1,000 likely 0.67 per 1,000 – 3.49 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,338 cases No different 1.35 per 1,000 likely 0.5 per 1,000 – 2.2 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

5 better than the nation 1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.35 likely 0.13 – 0.78 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.33 likely 0.13 – 0.68 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.16 likely 0.03 – 0.53 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.8 likely 0.04 – 3.95 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.25 likely 0.04 – 0.82 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.29 likely 0.18 – 0.45 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 647 cases Too few cases 16.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,153 cases Too few cases 21.5% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,102 cases Too few cases 16.6% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 374 cases Too few cases 19.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 182 cases Too few cases 10.9% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 413 cases Too few cases 29.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 760 cases Too few cases -26 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 755 cases Too few cases -18.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 332 cases No different 14.3 per 1,000 likely 10.7 per 1,000 – 18.9 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 38 cases No different 10.8 per 100 likely 7.1 per 100 – 16.2 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 38 cases No different 5 per 100 likely 3.1 per 100 – 8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 888 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.9 – 1.4 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

187 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 80 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Anesthesiology 56
Emergency Medicine 26
Critical Care Medicine 21
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 10
Hospitalist 8
Physician Assistant 8
Acute Care 7
Internal Medicine 6
Family 4
Pediatrics 4
Pharmacist 3
Physical Therapist 3

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $667,242 general $2,660 · research $664,582
All years, 2025–2025 $667,242 133 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 12 11 companies paid in total

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $1,650 6
Education $640 1
Debt forgiveness $370 5

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Abbott Laboratories $364,875 68
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $148,788 36
Boston Scientific Corporation $58,866 6
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $58,679 2
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $26,354 2
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,036 3
Pinnacle Biologics, Inc $1,650 6
Beckman Coulter, Inc. $983 4

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
ISM2402005A--Clinical Evaluation of the PCO2 Test in Venous, Arterial and Capillary Specimens using the i-STAT CG4+ Cartridge with the i-STAT 1 Analy… Abbott Laboratories $347,139
A Phase 2 Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Single-Dose Study of Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of REGN7544, an NPR1 Anta… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT06593600 $148,788
POLARx PAS Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT06170606 $58,866
A Pivotal Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the sGC Stimulator Vericiguat,MK-1242 in Adult… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $58,679
A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Trial Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein (a) Lowering With TQJ230 on Major Cardiovascular… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $14,469
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Trial, Assessing the Impact of Inclisiran on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Partici… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $11,885
ISM2512029A-Nasal Swab Collection in Patients Symptomatic or Confirmed Positive of COVID-19, Influenza A, or Influenza B Abbott Laboratories $8,000
A Phase 2/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle… Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,036

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Chandler Regional Medical Center

Is Chandler Regional Medical Center a good hospital?

Chandler Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 6 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Chandler Regional Medical Center?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 476 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Chandler Regional Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 3% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Chandler Regional Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $667,242 in payments to Chandler Regional Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.