USCareCheck

CMS certification 050076

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco

2425 Geary Blvd, San Francisco, CA 94115

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 9 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on none.

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 2,553 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 2 better of 9 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,553 completed surveys, 29% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
CA 69% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
69%
CA 68% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
CA 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
CA 76% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
58%
CA 59% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
86%
CA 85% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
65%
CA 72% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
39%
CA 48% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 106 patients 62% 70% 65%

How Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San FranciscoThis hospital4/572%—2 better
California Pacific Medical Ctr-Davies Campus HospSame city3/574%2 h 40 min1 better 1 worse
UCSF Health St. Mary's HospitalSame city4/560%2 h 46 min3 better
California Pacific Medical Center - Mission BernalSame city4/576%3 h 24 min1 better 3 worse
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma CtrSame city2/572%5 h2 better 3 worse
California Pacific Medical Center- van Ness CampusSame city3/578%3 h 18 min1 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in San Francisco.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,575 cases Too few cases 3.1% 3.9%
Stroke 175 cases Too few cases 12.9% 11.9%

5 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.17 likely 0.73 – 1.61 1
After hip or knee replacement 44 cases Too few cases 4.2% 4.1%
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 562 cases No different 1.52 per 1,000 likely 0.38 per 1,000 – 2.65 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 624 cases No different 0.2 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 702 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 205 cases No different 2.14 per 1,000 likely 0.48 per 1,000 – 3.8 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 122 cases No different 1.5 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.14 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 130 cases No different 7.91 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 16.05 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 228 cases No different 3.21 per 1,000 likely 0.68 per 1,000 – 5.75 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 123 cases No different 4.72 per 1,000 likely 0.6 per 1,000 – 8.85 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 56 cases No different 1.73 per 1,000 likely 0.21 per 1,000 – 3.25 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 140 cases No different 1 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.07 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.45 likely 0.14 – 1.1 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.37 likely 0.09 – 1.01 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 2.46 likely 1.2 – 4.51 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.82 likely 0.31 – 6.02 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.44 likely 0.07 – 1.44 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.25 likely 0.12 – 0.45 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 467 cases Too few cases 12.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 497 cases Too few cases 21.8% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 317 cases Too few cases 17% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 111 cases Too few cases 19.1% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 266 cases Too few cases 10% 11%

9 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

256 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 165 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Pharmacist 53
Internal Medicine 41
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 20
Physical Therapist 18
Dietitian, Registered 16
Obstetrics & Gynecology 16
Hospitalist 7
Anesthesiology 6
Family 6
Surgical 6
Critical Care Medicine 5
Pediatrics 4

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $534,750 general $7,929 · research $526,821
All years, 2019–2025 $2.4M 432 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 8 8 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $5,487
  • 2020 $149,110
  • 2021 $595,834
  • 2022 $109,649
  • 2023 $332,031
  • 2024 $717,242
  • 2025 $534,750

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $5,050 2
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $2,879 6

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Amgen Inc. $338,847 5
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $136,537 2
Pi-Cardia, Inc. $42,564 1
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. $6,474 5
Biogen, Inc. $5,050 2
Endotronix, INC. $2,400 1
Masimo Corporation $2,237 5
Medtronic, Inc. $641 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind Maintenance Study to Assess Long-term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rocatinlimab in Adult and Adolescent… Amgen Inc. $227,122
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant MK-2870 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Trea… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $134,483
A Phase 3, Open Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of First Line Tarlatamab in Combination With Durvalumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide Versus Durval… Amgen Inc. $95,737
Shortcut Pivotal Study Pi-Cardia, Inc. $42,564
A Phase 3, Randomized, 24-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) Mono… Amgen Inc. $15,988
Evaluation of the GORE EXCLUDER Thoracoabdominal Branch Endoprosthesis in the Treatment of Thoracoabdominal and Pararenal Aortic Aneurysms W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NCT03728985 $6,474
PROACTIVE-HF ENDOTRONIX, INC. $2,400
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of MK-2870 vs. Platinum Doublets in Participants with EGFR-mutated, Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $2,054

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco

Is Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco a good hospital?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 9 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,553 completed HCAHPS surveys.

Does Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco have an emergency room?

Yes. CMS lists emergency services at Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco.

Does Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $534,750 in payments to Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.