USCareCheck

CMS certification 050424

Scripps Green Hospital

10666 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037

Acute Care Hospitals

Scripps Green Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 86% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 20 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 1.

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 86% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 5/5 1,523 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 7 better of 20 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,523 completed surveys, 34% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
86%
CA 69% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
83%
CA 68% · US 72% · 5 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
83%
CA 76% · US 80% · 5 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
86%
CA 76% · US 80% · 5 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
70%
CA 59% · US 62% · 4 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
91%
CA 85% · US 86% · 5 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
77%
CA 72% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
61%
CA 48% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 51 patients 84% 70% 65%

How Scripps Green Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Scripps Green HospitalThis hospital5/586%—7 better 1 worse
Scripps Memorial Hospital La JollaSame city5/585%3 h 6 min9 better 2 worse
Palomar Health Downtown CampusSame county · Escondido3/566%3 h 51 min4 better 1 worse
Scripps Memorial Hospital - EncinitasSame county · Encinitas4/580%3 h 20 min7 better 1 worse
NH Camp PendletonSame county · Camp PendletonNot rated75%2 h 28 min—
Tri-City Medical CenterSame county · Oceanside1/552%4 h 8 min2 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in La Jolla.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,038 cases Too few cases 3% 3.9%
Heart failure 85 cases Too few cases 8.8% 11.1%
Pneumonia 180 cases Too few cases 11.7% 15.2%
Stroke 65 cases Too few cases 10.3% 11.9%
COPD 34 cases Too few cases 7.4% 8.6%

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.97 likely 0.67 – 1.27 1
After hip or knee replacement 888 cases Too few cases 2.8% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 92 cases No different 150.88 per 1,000 likely 96.36 per 1,000 – 205.4 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 3,005 cases No different 0.42 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.17 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 5,294 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 5,488 cases No different 0.21 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 0.4 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,705 cases No different 2.87 per 1,000 likely 1.51 per 1,000 – 4.23 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 2,332 cases No different 1.66 per 1,000 likely 0.13 per 1,000 – 3.18 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 2,355 cases No different 7.38 per 1,000 likely 2.05 per 1,000 – 12.71 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,832 cases No different 3.58 per 1,000 likely 1.83 per 1,000 – 5.33 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 2,290 cases No different 7.56 per 1,000 likely 4.7 per 1,000 – 10.42 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 719 cases No different 1.62 per 1,000 likely 0.15 per 1,000 – 3.09 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,753 cases No different 0.77 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.71 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.29 likely 0.01 – 1.42 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.74 likely 0.12 – 2.45 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.51 likely 0.09 – 1.69 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.74 likely 0.04 – 3.66 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.21 likely 0.09 – 0.41 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after heart failure 109 cases Too few cases 20.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 255 cases Too few cases 15.3% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 49 cases Too few cases 20.3% 20%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 856 cases Too few cases 4.4% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after heart failure 91 cases Too few cases -41.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 203 cases Too few cases -35.8 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 3,239 cases No different 11.1 per 1,000 likely 8.8 per 1,000 – 13.8 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 32 cases No different 10 per 100 likely 6.7 per 100 – 14.6 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 32 cases No different 5.6 per 100 likely 3.5 per 100 – 8.7 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,306 cases No different 0.8 likely 0.7 – 1 —

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

488 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 78 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Hospitalist 46
Diagnostic Radiology 43
Internal Medicine 41
Physician Assistant 32
Geriatric Medicine 22
Nurse Practitioner 21
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 17
Gastroenterology 17
Cardiovascular Disease 15
Orthopaedic Surgery 12
Critical Care Medicine 11
Neurology 11

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $694,344 general $134,138 · research $560,205
All years, 2019–2025 $16.8M 1,433 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 13 23 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $4.1M
  • 2020 $4.4M
  • 2021 $4.7M
  • 2022 $1.3M
  • 2023 $1.2M
  • 2024 $480,772
  • 2025 $694,344

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $60,750 16
Grants $51,725 10
Debt forgiveness $21,663 17

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Genentech, Inc. $177,883 4
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $115,909 6
Sequel Med Tech, LLC $68,367 62
Moximed, INC $63,765 4
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $63,263 1
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $38,100 6
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $27,397 2
Biotronik INC. $23,686 11

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BMS-986278 in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $82,599
Innovative Automated Insulin Delivery System for T2D Sequel Med Tech, LLC · NCT06853990 $68,367
RCT Motion MOXIMED, INC $63,765
MECHANISMS OF DUPILUMAB IN AERD - EFFECTS ON ASPIRIN HYPERSENSITIVITY RESPONSE, WITH A FOCUS ON INNATE TYPE 2 INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $63,263
Ph3 study of Pola R CHP Glofit vs PolaR CHP in 1L DLBCL Genentech, Inc. $62,248
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BMS-986278 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $30,310
A Phase 3, Randomized Double Blind Study to Evaluate Peri-operative Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Perioperative Placebo Neo… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $27,397
RUPTURED ANEURYSMS TREATED WITH HYDROGEL COILS (RAGE) MicroVention, Inc. · NCT03252314 $17,500

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Scripps Green Hospital

Is Scripps Green Hospital a good hospital?

Scripps Green Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 20 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Scripps Green Hospital?

86% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,523 completed HCAHPS surveys.

Does Scripps Green Hospital have an emergency room?

No. CMS does not list emergency services at Scripps Green Hospital.

Does Scripps Green Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $694,344 in payments to Scripps Green Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.