USCareCheck

CMS certification 050291

Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital

30 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 79% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 32 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 79% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 752 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 3 better of 24 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 752 completed surveys, 22% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
79%
CA 69% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
76%
CA 68% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
CA 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
75%
CA 76% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
CA 59% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
88%
CA 85% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
67%
CA 72% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
55%
CA 48% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 378 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 3 h 32 min 2 h 54 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 20 visits sampled 5 h 2 min 4 h 20 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 45,020 patients 2% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 17 patients 76% 74% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 146 patients 63% 70% 65%

How Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Sutter Santa Rosa Regional HospitalThis hospital5/579%3 h 32 min3 better 1 worse
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa RosaSame city3/575%—2 better
Providence Santa Rosa Memorial HospitalSame city3/569%2 h 43 min2 better 1 worse
Healdsburg HospitalSame county · HealdsburgNot rated77%1 h 34 min1 worse
Sonoma Valley HospitalSame county · Sonoma2/579%1 h 59 minNo different
Petaluma Valley HospitalSame county · Petaluma4/570%2 h 50 min1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Santa Rosa.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 1,971 cases Too few cases 2.9% 3.9%
Heart attack 192 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 316 cases Too few cases 10.5% 11.1%
Pneumonia 296 cases Too few cases 14% 15.2%
Stroke 142 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.9%
COPD 85 cases Too few cases 6.8% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.03 likely 0.69 – 1.37 1
After hip or knee replacement 206 cases Too few cases 3.1% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 54 cases No different 162.53 per 1,000 likely 108.3 per 1,000 – 216.76 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 4,064 cases No different 0.18 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.89 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 4,946 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 4,974 cases No different 0.23 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,214 cases No different 2.36 per 1,000 likely 0.82 per 1,000 – 3.9 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 532 cases No different 1.5 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.15 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 558 cases No different 9.87 per 1,000 likely 2.35 per 1,000 – 17.39 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,288 cases No different 4.99 per 1,000 likely 2.93 per 1,000 – 7.06 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 522 cases No different 8.01 per 1,000 likely 4.29 per 1,000 – 11.73 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 337 cases No different 1.6 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 3.05 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,147 cases No different 1.03 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 1.99 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.63 likely 0.16 – 1.71 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.3 likely 0.02 – 1.47 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.16 likely 0.07 – 0.31 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 186 cases Too few cases 14.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 342 cases Too few cases 21% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 309 cases Too few cases 16.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 100 cases Too few cases 19.8% 20%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 215 cases Too few cases 5.3% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 184 cases Too few cases -4.1 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 352 cases Too few cases -14 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 309 cases Too few cases -17.4 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,275 cases No different 14 per 1,000 likely 10.8 per 1,000 – 18 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 259 cases No different 11.6 per 100 likely 8.8 per 100 – 15 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 259 cases No different 7.2 per 100 likely 5.1 per 100 – 9.8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 702 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.9 – 1.4 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

45 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 12
Hospitalist 5
Family 3
Family Medicine 3
Acute Care 2
Anesthesiology 2
Clinical 2
Pharmacist Clinician (PhC)/ Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 2
Pharmacotherapy 2
Colon & Rectal Surgery 1
Critical Care Medicine 1
Diagnostic Radiology 1

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $556,210 general $5,750 · research $550,460
All years, 2019–2025 $1.8M 328 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 9 7 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $197,938
  • 2020 $270,033
  • 2021 $62,514
  • 2022 $60,063
  • 2023 $478,008
  • 2024 $194,950
  • 2025 $556,210

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $5,000 2
Gifts $750 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $307,498 4
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $184,476 42
Abbvie INC. $40,005 3
AstraZeneca UK Limited $17,100 1
Incyte Corporation $3,882 2
Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,500 1
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $750 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Randomized 2-cohort Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of AZD5305 in Combination with Physicians Choice New Hormonal Agents in Patient… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $203,745
A Study of Milvexian in Participants After an Acute Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack- LIBREXIA-STROKE (LIBREXIA-STROK) Janssen Research & Development, LLC $171,976
A Two Part Phase IIa b Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose-ranging Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and T… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $91,047
M20-621 - A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Epcoritamab in Combination with R-CHOP compared to R-C… ABBVIE INC. $24,952
A Phase III Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Capivasertib + Docetaxel Versus Placebo + Docetaxel… AstraZeneca UK Limited $17,100
A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Epcoritamab in Combination with R-CHOP compared to R-CHOP in Sub… ABBVIE INC. · NCT05578976 $15,053
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab Monotherapy versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (PVd) or Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone (Kd) … Janssen Research & Development, LLC $12,500
Dapagliflozin in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $10,206

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital

Is Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital a good hospital?

Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 24 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital?

79% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 752 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 32 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $556,210 in payments to Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.