USCareCheck

CMS certification 050441

Stanford Health Care

300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services

Stanford Health Care has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 83% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 10 and worse on 4. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 36 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 83% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 6,810 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 4 worse 10 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 6,810 completed surveys, 25% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
83%
CA 69% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
79%
CA 68% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
82%
CA 76% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
CA 76% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
63%
CA 59% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
89%
CA 85% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
75%
CA 72% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
53%
CA 48% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 348 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 36 min 2 h 54 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 12 visits sampled 7 h 10 min 4 h 20 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 83,086 patients 3% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 20 patients 70% 74% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 221 patients 53% 70% 65%

How Stanford Health Care compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Stanford Health CareThis hospital5/583%4 h 36 min10 better 4 worse
Palo Alto VA Medical CenterSame county · Palo Alto5/584%—1 better 1 worse
El Camino HealthSame county · Mountain View4/580%2 h 43 min7 better 1 worse
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa ClaraSame county · Santa Clara2/575%—2 better 1 worse
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San JoseSame county · San Jose3/566%—1 better
Good Samaritan HospitalSame county · San Jose2/567%2 h 19 min1 better 5 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 7,730 cases Too few cases 2.1% 3.9%
Heart attack 253 cases Too few cases 9.7% 11.9%
Heart failure 880 cases Too few cases 6.3% 11.1%
Pneumonia 935 cases Too few cases 10.3% 15.2%
Stroke 501 cases Too few cases 8.7% 11.9%
COPD 146 cases Too few cases 6.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 192 cases Too few cases 1.1% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.86 likely 0.72 – 1 1
After hip or knee replacement 416 cases Too few cases 3.6% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 470 cases No different 166.09 per 1,000 likely 137.88 per 1,000 – 194.3 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 19,915 cases No different 0.52 per 1,000 likely 0.21 per 1,000 – 0.83 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 20,799 cases No different 0.13 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.27 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 23,182 cases No different 0.28 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 7,846 cases No different 2.36 per 1,000 likely 1.54 per 1,000 – 3.19 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 5,694 cases No different 0.94 per 1,000 likely 0.2 per 1,000 – 1.68 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 5,296 cases Better 4.08 per 1,000 likely 1.95 per 1,000 – 6.21 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 8,661 cases Worse 5.31 per 1,000 likely 4.24 per 1,000 – 6.37 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 5,603 cases No different 5.2 per 1,000 likely 3.76 per 1,000 – 6.64 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 2,211 cases No different 1.38 per 1,000 likely 0.23 per 1,000 – 2.53 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 5,374 cases No different 1.06 per 1,000 likely 0.45 per 1,000 – 1.67 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.87 likely 0.66 – 1.12 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.32 likely 0.18 – 0.53 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.24 likely 0.09 – 0.53 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.37 likely 0.02 – 1.82 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.86 likely 0.47 – 1.46 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.45 likely 0.34 – 0.57 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 247 cases Too few cases 16.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,021 cases Too few cases 20.5% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 959 cases Too few cases 16.5% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 183 cases Too few cases 19.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 158 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 425 cases Too few cases 5.1% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 258 cases Too few cases 47.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 990 cases Too few cases -1.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 976 cases Too few cases 20.8 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 4,578 cases No different 12.7 per 1,000 likely 10.4 per 1,000 – 15.4 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 2,191 cases Worse 14.1 per 100 likely 12.7 per 100 – 15.7 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 2,191 cases No different 5.2 per 100 likely 4.4 per 100 – 6.2 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 3,348 cases Better 0.7 likely 0.6 – 0.9 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

4,895 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 657 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Practitioner 581
Physician Assistant 468
Anesthesiology 396
Internal Medicine 374
Diagnostic Radiology 237
Emergency Medicine 164
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 118
Psychiatry 98
Clinical 96
Cardiovascular Disease 91
Neurological Surgery 90
Neurology 80

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $3.2M general $578,929 · research $2.6M
All years, 2019–2025 $14.1M 1,031 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 42 31 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $913,159
  • 2020 $771,647
  • 2021 $1.8M
  • 2022 $2.1M
  • 2023 $1.2M
  • 2024 $4.1M
  • 2025 $3.2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $318,248 46
Speaking, teaching and other services $134,735 4
Space rental and facility fees $66,998 9
Royalties and licensing fees $37,516 4
Debt forgiveness $20,847 8
Food and beverage $479 3
Education $106 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1M 88
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $736,961 15
Medtronic, Inc. $289,710 1
Abbott Laboratories $247,775 39
Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC $163,300 2
National Marrow Donor Program $158,255 6
Pfizer INC. $149,730 11
Servier BioInnovation $110,929 43

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
TAK-861-3001 A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-861 for the Treatment of Narcolepsy with Cataplexy Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $541,808
Phase I Clinical Trial of MEK Inhibitor Trametinib in the Treatment of Complicated Extracranial Arterial Venous Malformation Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $295,613
SPYRAL AFFIRM Medtronic, Inc. $289,710
Pilot Phase 1 study of perioperative peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in metastatic, WHO Grade 1 or 2, SSTR positive, gastroenteropancrea… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $223,584
Preventing ASNase-associated pancreatitis using the novel dimension of metabolomics and proteomics Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC $163,300
TACTIVEU AN INTERVENTIONAL SAFETY AND EFFICACY PHASE 1B2 OPENLABEL UMBRELLA STUDY TO INVESTIGATE TOLERABILITY PK AND ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF ARV471 PF0… PFIZER INC. $145,161
A LONG-TERM EXTENSION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF TAK-861 IN PARTICIPANTS WITH SELECTED CENTRAL HYPERSOMNIA CONDITIONS Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $131,823
A Dose-Finding, Adaptive, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of TAK-360 in Parti… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $111,639

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Stanford Health Care

Is Stanford Health Care a good hospital?

Stanford Health Care has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 10 and worse on 4. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Stanford Health Care?

83% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 6,810 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Stanford Health Care emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 36 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 3% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Stanford Health Care receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $3.2M in payments to Stanford Health Care for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.