USCareCheck

CMS certification 100006

Orlando Health

52 W Underwood St, Orlando, FL 32806

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Orlando Health has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 9 and worse on 4. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 57 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 75% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 10,480 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 4 worse 9 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 10,480 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
75%
FL 69% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
74%
FL 68% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
78%
FL 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
FL 75% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
FL 58% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
FL 83% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
71%
FL 72% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
63%
FL 56% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Florida average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital FL US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 5,049 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 57 min 2 h 36 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 170 visits sampled 5 h 32 min 3 h 40 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 332,931 patients 1% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 296 patients 61% 73% 65%

How Orlando Health compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Orlando HealthThis hospital4/575%2 h 57 min9 better 4 worse
Adventhealth OrlandoSame city3/575%2 h 40 min11 better 7 worse
Orlando VA Medical CenterSame city5/581%—3 better 1 worse
Ucf Lake Nona HospitalSame city3/575%2 h 18 min1 better
Orlando Health-Health Central HospitalSame county · Ocoee3/573%2 h 29 min3 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Orlando.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 14,199 cases Too few cases 2.6% 3.9%
Heart attack 379 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 990 cases Too few cases 8.5% 11.1%
Pneumonia 735 cases Too few cases 10.1% 15.2%
Stroke 995 cases Too few cases 8.8% 11.9%
COPD 280 cases Too few cases 7.3% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 234 cases Too few cases 1.2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.99 likely 0.81 – 1.17 1
After hip or knee replacement 1,887 cases Too few cases 3% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 286 cases No different 146.42 per 1,000 likely 113.4 per 1,000 – 179.44 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 17,034 cases No different 0.52 per 1,000 likely 0.16 per 1,000 – 0.88 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 23,330 cases No different 0.17 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.31 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 23,568 cases No different 0.19 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 7,259 cases No different 2.41 per 1,000 likely 1.42 per 1,000 – 3.41 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 4,099 cases No different 0.98 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.14 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,998 cases No different 7.47 per 1,000 likely 3.97 per 1,000 – 10.97 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 7,572 cases No different 4.45 per 1,000 likely 3.21 per 1,000 – 5.7 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 4,045 cases No different 7.18 per 1,000 likely 5.02 per 1,000 – 9.35 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,032 cases No different 1.76 per 1,000 likely 0.46 per 1,000 – 3.05 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,146 cases No different 1.38 per 1,000 likely 0.66 per 1,000 – 2.11 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.38 likely 0.23 – 0.58 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.34 likely 0.18 – 0.58 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.05 likely 0.7 – 1.5 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.6 likely 0.15 – 1.63 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 1.24 likely 0.9 – 1.67 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.21 likely 0.15 – 0.29 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 1,030 cases Too few cases 14.3% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 2,627 cases Too few cases 23.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,563 cases Too few cases 18.3% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 741 cases Too few cases 21.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 336 cases Too few cases 12.1% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 1,927 cases Too few cases 5.6% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 436 cases Too few cases -20.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 1,221 cases Too few cases -1.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 837 cases Too few cases -20.1 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 858 cases No different 12.3 per 1,000 likely 9.4 per 1,000 – 15.9 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 862 cases Worse 15.9 per 100 likely 13.7 per 100 – 18.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 862 cases Better 3.9 per 100 likely 3 per 100 – 5.1 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,366 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.7 – 1.1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

395 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 115 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Diagnostic Radiology 80
Internal Medicine 64
Anesthesiologist Assistant 40
Adult Health 32
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 28
Anesthesiology 21
Emergency Medicine 21
Critical Care Medicine 14
Family 14
Registered Nurse 11
Vascular & Interventional Radiology 8
Family Medicine 7

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $6.9M general $1.5M · research $5.4M
All years, 2019–2025 $30.9M 5,147 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 139 92 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.6M
  • 2020 $4M
  • 2021 $3.4M
  • 2022 $4M
  • 2023 $4.4M
  • 2024 $6.6M
  • 2025 $6.9M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $748,607 34
Space rental and facility fees $494,591 47
Speaking, teaching and other services $96,163 15
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $63,400 5
Education $25,717 4
Debt forgiveness $20,953 4
Food and beverage $1,749 40
Gifts $29 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $787,864 448
ModernaTX, Inc. $622,944 83
Boston Scientific Corporation $479,419 20
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $441,264 48
Medtronic, Inc. $370,680 26
Genzyme Corporation $315,790 24
Ethicon Inc. $300,390 5
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $292,619 66

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
DAREON-8: A Phase I, open-label, dose escalation and expansion trial of repeated intravenous infusions of BI 764532 combined with Standard of care (p… Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $382,790
A PHASE 3 TRIAL OF FIANLIMAB (ANTI-LAG-3) AND CEMIPLIMAB VERSUS PEMBROLIZUMAB IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLETELY RESECTED HIGH-RISK … Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT05608291 $370,164
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-4157 Alone and in Combination in Participants… ModernaTX, Inc. $336,709
Safety and Performance of the OTTAVA Robotic System: A Prospective, Multi-Center Evaluation Ethicon Inc. $300,390
A PHASE 3 TRIAL OF FIANLIMAB (REGN3767, ANTI-LAG-3) + CEMIPLIMAB VERSUS PEMBROLIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED UNRESECTABLE LOCALLY ADVA… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT05352672 $281,036
Master Protocol of Two Independent, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Studies Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Frexalimab (SAR441344) to Teriflunomid… GENZYME CORPORATION · NCT06141473 $278,350
Study of mRNA-4359 Administered Alone and in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors ModernaTX, Inc. · NCT05533697 $220,415
A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial of Acasunlimab (GEN1046) in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Subjects With PD-… Genmab A/S $207,687

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Orlando Health

Is Orlando Health a good hospital?

Orlando Health has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 9 and worse on 4. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Orlando Health?

75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 10,480 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Orlando Health emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 57 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Orlando Health receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $6.9M in payments to Orlando Health for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.