USCareCheck

CMS certification 130006

St Luke's Regional Medical Center

190 East Bannock Street, Boise, ID 83712

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

St Luke's Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 48 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 80% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 2,628 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 8 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,628 completed surveys, 27% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
80%
ID 75% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
76%
ID 75% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
81%
ID 82% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
ID 83% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
65%
ID 65% · US 62% · 4 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
92%
ID 90% · US 86% · 5 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
75%
ID 76% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
58%
ID 63% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Idaho average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital ID US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 9,377 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 48 min 2 h 22 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 415 visits sampled 3 h 53 min 3 h 23 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 110,984 patients 2% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 16 patients 62% 65% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 119 patients 60% 68% 65%

How St Luke's Regional Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
St Luke's Regional Medical CenterThis hospital5/580%2 h 48 min8 better 1 worse
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterSame city3/577%2 h 34 min5 better 1 worse
Treasure Valley HospitalSame cityNot rated89%—1 better
Boise VA Medical CenterSame city5/588%—3 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Boise.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,937 cases Too few cases 2.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 345 cases Too few cases 11.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 508 cases Too few cases 15% 11.1%
Pneumonia 534 cases Too few cases 14.9% 15.2%
Stroke 796 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
COPD 122 cases Too few cases 9.8% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 85 cases Too few cases 2.7% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.84 likely 0.6 – 1.09 1
After hip or knee replacement 124 cases Too few cases 4.7% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 160 cases No different 139.38 per 1,000 likely 95.48 per 1,000 – 183.27 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,363 cases No different 0.39 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.96 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 9,027 cases No different 0.34 per 1,000 likely 0.15 per 1,000 – 0.52 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 9,267 cases No different 0.23 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.41 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,793 cases No different 2.52 per 1,000 likely 1.25 per 1,000 – 3.8 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,577 cases No different 1.33 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.7 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,482 cases No different 6.3 per 1,000 likely 1.86 per 1,000 – 10.74 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,997 cases No different 3.48 per 1,000 likely 1.85 per 1,000 – 5.1 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,483 cases No different 4.78 per 1,000 likely 2.15 per 1,000 – 7.42 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 843 cases No different 1.4 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 2.76 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,278 cases No different 1.61 per 1,000 likely 0.78 per 1,000 – 2.43 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.7 likely 0.38 – 1.2 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.67 likely 0.34 – 1.19 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.41 likely 0.15 – 0.9 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.94 likely 0.16 – 3.1 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.2 likely 0.03 – 0.67 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.46 likely 0.34 – 0.61 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 607 cases Too few cases 12.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 965 cases Too few cases 17.8% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 901 cases Too few cases 16.3% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 237 cases Too few cases 18.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 131 cases Too few cases 9.8% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 133 cases Too few cases 5.4% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 373 cases Too few cases -3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 559 cases Too few cases -48.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 546 cases Too few cases -23.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 361 cases No different 13.6 per 1,000 likely 10.3 per 1,000 – 18.2 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,092 cases Better 8.1 per 100 likely 6.8 per 100 – 9.7 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,092 cases No different 5.2 per 100 likely 4.1 per 100 – 6.4 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,189 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

697 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Pharmacist 75
Emergency Medicine 61
Social Worker 54
Internal Medicine 40
Physical Therapist 39
Occupational Therapist 38
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 35
Diagnostic Radiology 32
Physician Assistant 31
Pediatrics 26
Family 19
Hospitalist 18

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $1.2M general $43,576 · research $1.1M
All years, 2019–2025 $7.6M 1,583 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 54 33 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1M
  • 2020 $1.2M
  • 2021 $1.5M
  • 2022 $1.3M
  • 2023 $702,954
  • 2024 $754,625
  • 2025 $1.2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $24,625 81
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $9,583 3
Space rental and facility fees $5,400 4
Debt forgiveness $3,268 2
Education $700 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $254,922 5
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $159,172 5
Eli Lilly and Company $87,591 7
Boston Scientific Corporation $85,754 35
Pfizer INC. $80,262 7
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. $61,534 16
Amgen Inc. $57,386 3
Abbvie INC. $47,489 21

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
a phase 3 multi center,open label,sponsor blinded,randomized study of azd0901 monotherapy compared with investigator s choice of therapy in second or… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $157,834
A Phase 3, Open-label Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of VX-121 Combination Therapy in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED $140,966
A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double blind, Parallel group, Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab (MEDI… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $61,581
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Assessing the Impact of Olpasiran on Major Cardiovascular Events in Participants Wi… Amgen Inc. $55,694
SIMPLAAFY Boston Scientific Corporation · NCT06521463 $53,835
A Study to Evaluate the Optimization of the CRS Profile for Glofit+GemOx in R/R DLBCL Genentech, Inc. $38,331
COMPaSS Clinical Study Carlsmed, Inc. $37,556
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan sac-TMT, MK-2870 as a Monotherapy and in Combination… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $34,812

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about St Luke's Regional Medical Center

Is St Luke's Regional Medical Center a good hospital?

St Luke's Regional Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend St Luke's Regional Medical Center?

80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,628 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the St Luke's Regional Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 48 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does St Luke's Regional Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $1.2M in payments to St Luke's Regional Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.