USCareCheck

CMS certification 220002

Mount Auburn Hospital

330 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Mount Auburn Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 1 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 75% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,714 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 1 better of 26 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,714 completed surveys, 25% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
75%
MA 70% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
70%
MA 68% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
MA 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
79%
MA 79% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
MA 61% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
MA 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
66%
MA 70% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
52%
MA 48% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Massachusetts average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as medium; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital MA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 370 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 2 h 45 min 3 h 25 min 3 h 34 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 26 visits sampled 2 h 28 min 5 h 38 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 34,337 patients 2% 4% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 115 patients 38% 56% 65%

How Mount Auburn Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Mount Auburn HospitalThis hospital4/575%3 h 25 min1 better 1 worse
Cambridge Health AllianceSame city3/565%2 h 33 min2 better
Melrosewakefield HealthcareSame county · Melrose3/564%3 h 10 min1 better 3 worse
Winchester HospitalSame county · Winchester3/575%3 h 53 min1 better 4 worse
Lowell General HospitalSame county · Lowell2/566%4 h 27 min1 better 6 worse
Newton-Wellesley HospitalSame county · Newton5/579%4 h 25 min7 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Cambridge.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,322 cases Too few cases 3.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 197 cases Too few cases 11% 11.9%
Heart failure 471 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 576 cases Too few cases 11.3% 15.2%
Stroke 177 cases Too few cases 10.3% 11.9%
COPD 95 cases Too few cases 7.1% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 81 cases Too few cases 1.8% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.09 likely 0.74 – 1.43 1
After hip or knee replacement 126 cases Too few cases 4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 45 cases No different 186.93 per 1,000 likely 131.52 per 1,000 – 242.33 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 5,084 cases No different 0.18 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.91 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 5,943 cases No different 0.32 per 1,000 likely 0.11 per 1,000 – 0.52 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 5,901 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.46 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,055 cases No different 2.15 per 1,000 likely 0.59 per 1,000 – 3.7 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 524 cases No different 1.45 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.07 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 524 cases No different 12.31 per 1,000 likely 5.02 per 1,000 – 19.6 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,095 cases No different 3.88 per 1,000 likely 1.67 per 1,000 – 6.08 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 509 cases No different 8.59 per 1,000 likely 4.74 per 1,000 – 12.45 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 209 cases No different 2.02 per 1,000 likely 0.52 per 1,000 – 3.52 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 856 cases No different 1.13 per 1,000 likely 0.13 per 1,000 – 2.14 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.67 likely 0.11 – 2.2 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.74 likely 0.19 – 2.01 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.35 likely 0.02 – 1.74 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.54 likely 0.27 – 0.96 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 213 cases Too few cases 14.4% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 550 cases Too few cases 20.3% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 631 cases Too few cases 18% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 111 cases Too few cases 20.9% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 87 cases Too few cases 9% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 108 cases Too few cases 5.5% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 204 cases Too few cases 23 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 505 cases Too few cases 11.4 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 580 cases Too few cases 25.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 2,246 cases No different 12.2 per 1,000 likely 9.5 per 1,000 – 15.5 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 124 cases No different 10.8 per 100 likely 7.8 per 100 – 14.9 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 124 cases No different 5 per 100 likely 3.3 per 100 – 7.6 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 624 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.8 – 1.4 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

337 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 82 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 90
Clinical 32
Diagnostic Radiology 19
Physician Assistant 15
Surgical 15
Advanced Practice Midwife 14
Anesthesiology 14
Emergency Medicine 12
Midwife 11
Women's Health 9
Mental Health 8
Obstetrics & Gynecology 6

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $50,427 general $50,427 · research $0
All years, 2019–2025 $1.1M 728 reported payments
  • 2019 $210,737
  • 2020 $150,998
  • 2021 $307,598
  • 2022 $216,157
  • 2023 $119,546
  • 2024 $65,906
  • 2025 $50,427

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $28,926 60
Debt forgiveness $13,710 3
Consulting fees $7,510 10
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $282 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Biotronik INC. $12,376 1
Genzyme Corporation $7,555 16
ModernaTX, Inc. $6,999 22
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $6,652 8
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. $5,952 11
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,489 6
Life Technologies Corporation $3,367 1
Blueprint Medicines Corporation $1,422 6

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Mount Auburn Hospital

Is Mount Auburn Hospital a good hospital?

Mount Auburn Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 1 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Mount Auburn Hospital?

75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,714 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Mount Auburn Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with medium patient volume, like this one, the median is 2 h 45 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Mount Auburn Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $50,427 in payments to Mount Auburn Hospital for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.