USCareCheck

CMS certification 230046

University of Michigan Health System

1500 E Medical Center Drive, Spc 5474, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University of Michigan Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 82% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 5 h 45 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 82% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 824 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 8 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 824 completed surveys, 25% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
82%
MI 69% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
79%
MI 69% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
84%
MI 80% · US 80% · 5 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
MI 78% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
MI 61% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
88%
MI 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
61%
MI 69% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
43%
MI 57% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Michigan average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital MI US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 348 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 5 h 45 min 2 h 39 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 32 visits sampled 5 h 56 min 4 h 26 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 117,586 patients 3% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 16 patients 38% 72% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 465 patients 57% 60% 65%

How University of Michigan Health System compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University of Michigan Health SystemThis hospital4/582%5 h 45 min8 better 3 worse
Trinity Health Ann Arbor HospitalSame city4/577%4 h 1 min6 better 1 worse
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemSame city5/589%—4 better 1 worse
Chelsea HospitalSame county · Chelsea4/587%3 h 16 min2 better
Forest Health Medical CenterSame county · YpsilantiNot rated80%—No different
Beaumont Hospital - DearbornSame ZIP area · Dearborn2/549%3 h 22 min6 better 5 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Ann Arbor.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 7,196 cases Too few cases 2.4% 3.9%
Heart attack 165 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11.9%
Heart failure 734 cases Too few cases 8.9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 332 cases Too few cases 10.3% 15.2%
Stroke 390 cases Too few cases 11.3% 11.9%
COPD 138 cases Too few cases 10% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 108 cases Too few cases 2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 worse than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.92 likely 0.75 – 1.09 1
After hip or knee replacement 99 cases Too few cases 4.9% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 265 cases Worse 219.85 per 1,000 likely 183.61 per 1,000 – 256.09 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 14,078 cases No different 0.41 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.8 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 14,473 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 15,885 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 4,962 cases Worse 3.41 per 1,000 likely 2.49 per 1,000 – 4.33 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 3,139 cases No different 1.91 per 1,000 likely 1.03 per 1,000 – 2.78 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,010 cases No different 9.57 per 1,000 likely 6.92 per 1,000 – 12.21 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 5,454 cases No different 2.78 per 1,000 likely 1.44 per 1,000 – 4.13 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 3,258 cases No different 4.45 per 1,000 likely 2.57 per 1,000 – 6.33 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,414 cases No different 1.99 per 1,000 likely 0.77 per 1,000 – 3.2 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,021 cases No different 1.16 per 1,000 likely 0.46 per 1,000 – 1.86 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.41 likely 0.29 – 0.57 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.53 likely 0.36 – 0.77 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.12 likely 0.71 – 1.68 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.36 likely 0.43 – 3.27 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.6 likely 0.35 – 0.96 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.5 likely 0.4 – 0.62 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 241 cases Too few cases 14.6% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,425 cases Too few cases 19.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 568 cases Too few cases 16.6% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 280 cases Too few cases 19.3% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 158 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 111 cases Too few cases 5.3% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 176 cases Too few cases 10.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 871 cases Too few cases 0.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 344 cases Too few cases 85.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 4,556 cases No different 13.7 per 1,000 likely 11.2 per 1,000 – 16.5 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,530 cases No different 9.6 per 100 likely 8.2 per 100 – 11.1 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,530 cases No different 5.3 per 100 likely 4.4 per 100 – 6.5 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,376 cases Better 0.7 likely 0.6 – 0.9 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

5,419 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 750 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Practitioner 557
Physician Assistant 461
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 343
Anesthesiology 332
Internal Medicine 291
Diagnostic Radiology 243
Emergency Medicine 192
Physical Therapist 154
Psychiatry 95
Clinical 94
Gastroenterology 94
Obstetrics & Gynecology 93

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $73.3M general $31.6M · research $41.7M
All years, 2019–2025 $435M 26,838 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 538 207 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $42.6M
  • 2020 $57.5M
  • 2021 $63.4M
  • 2022 $64.9M
  • 2023 $65.4M
  • 2024 $67.8M
  • 2025 $73.3M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Royalties and licensing fees $26M 25
Grants $1.7M 66
Speaking, teaching and other services $1.4M 121
Consulting fees $1.2M 11
Space rental and facility fees $1M 124
Charitable contributions $186,383 11
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $105,237 5
Education $47,916 8
Gifts $14,500 4
Debt forgiveness $543 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Genzyme Corporation $17.5M 28
Abbvie INC. $5.1M 169
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $5M 119
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $4.3M 204
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $4.1M 46
Genentech, Inc. $3.2M 152
AstraZeneca AB $2.8M 3
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2.4M 38

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
ACUTE Trial: Acute severe ulcerative Colitis - Upadacitinib vs corticosteroid while Transitioning away from the Emergency setting ABBVIE INC. $3.3M
A PHASE 1, TWO ARM, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-DOSE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND LOCAL GI DRUG RELEASE/DISSOLUTION OF RIFAXIMIN SOLID SOLUBLE D… Bausch Health US, LLC $1.8M
An Open Label, Multi-center Asciminib Roll-over Study to Assess Long-term Safety in Patients Who Have Completed a Novartis Sponsored Asciminib Study … Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1.8M
Biology of Cancer Case-Control Study Genentech, Inc. $1.6M
A Phase 1 , Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Belzutifan MK-6482 in Participants With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carci… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $751,980
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belzutifan MK-6482, formerly PT2977 Monotherapy in Participants with Advanced Pheochromocytoma… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $689,213
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label Study Of CC-97540 (BMS-986353), CD19-Targeted Nex-T Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells, in Participants with … Celgene Corporation $683,259
An Open-Label Phase 2 Study to Evaluate PT2977 For The Treatment of Von Hippel-Lindau Disease-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $599,208

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University of Michigan Health System

Is University of Michigan Health System a good hospital?

University of Michigan Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 8 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University of Michigan Health System?

82% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 824 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University of Michigan Health System emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 5 h 45 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 3% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University of Michigan Health System receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $73.3M in payments to University of Michigan Health System for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.