USCareCheck

CMS certification 310001

Hackensack University Medical Center

30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ 07601

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Hackensack University Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 12 and worse on 4. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 74% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 4,034 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 4 worse 12 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 4,034 completed surveys, 16% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
74%
NJ 65% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
72%
NJ 65% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
NJ 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
76%
NJ 75% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
NJ 58% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
NJ 83% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
70%
NJ 69% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
51%
NJ 49% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New Jersey average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NJ US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 382 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 22 min 3 h 6 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 13 visits sampled 4 h 9 min 4 h 52 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 150,754 patients 1% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 14 patients 93% 73% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 204 patients 72% 73% 65%

How Hackensack University Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Hackensack University Medical CenterThis hospital5/574%3 h 22 min12 better 4 worse
Englewood Hospital and Medical CenterSame county · Englewood4/578%3 h 3 min3 better 2 worse
Bergen New Bridge Medical CenterSame county · ParamusNot rated65%2 h 25 min1 better 1 worse
Valley HospitalSame county · Paramus4/579%3 h 47 min6 better 1 worse
Holy Name Medical CenterSame county · Teaneck5/573%3 h 24 min4 better 1 worse
Hackensack Meridian Health Pascack Valley MedicalSame county · Westwood5/570%2 h 22 min1 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,455 cases Too few cases 2.9% 3.9%
Heart attack 319 cases Too few cases 10% 11.9%
Heart failure 981 cases Too few cases 8.2% 11.1%
Pneumonia 1,211 cases Too few cases 11% 15.2%
Stroke 579 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11.9%
COPD 233 cases Too few cases 5.6% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 258 cases Too few cases 1.3% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 better than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Better 0.72 likely 0.54 – 0.91 1
After hip or knee replacement 44 cases Too few cases 5% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 238 cases No different 163.25 per 1,000 likely 128.74 per 1,000 – 197.77 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 15,623 cases No different 0.58 per 1,000 likely 0.24 per 1,000 – 0.93 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 15,346 cases No different 0.16 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.32 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 16,531 cases No different 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.38 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,764 cases No different 1.65 per 1,000 likely 0.54 per 1,000 – 2.77 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,630 cases No different 1.44 per 1,000 likely 0.27 per 1,000 – 2.61 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,627 cases Better 4.88 per 1,000 likely 1.37 per 1,000 – 8.39 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 4,288 cases No different 2.13 per 1,000 likely 0.74 per 1,000 – 3.52 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,599 cases No different 4.25 per 1,000 likely 1.78 per 1,000 – 6.72 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,101 cases No different 1.28 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.58 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 3,345 cases No different 0.88 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 1.62 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.34 likely 0.15 – 0.66 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.38 likely 0.2 – 0.66 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.51 likely 0.22 – 1.01 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.09 likely 0.35 – 2.62 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.8 likely 0.49 – 1.24 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.35 likely 0.26 – 0.47 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 2 better than the nation 1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 488 cases Too few cases 13.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,280 cases Too few cases 19.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,492 cases Too few cases 16.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 293 cases Too few cases 19.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 292 cases Too few cases 9.8% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 43 cases Too few cases 5.2% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 403 cases Too few cases 17.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 1,092 cases Too few cases 16.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 1,244 cases Too few cases 8.1 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 706 cases No different 12.1 per 1,000 likely 9.3 per 1,000 – 15.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,195 cases Worse 14.3 per 100 likely 12.5 per 100 – 16.3 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,195 cases Better 3.6 per 100 likely 2.7 per 100 – 4.6 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,075 cases Better 0.7 likely 0.5 – 0.8 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

981 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 274 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Emergency Medicine 93
Anesthesiology 87
Pediatrics 79
Physician Assistant 59
Diagnostic Radiology 52
Internal Medicine 49
Family 48
Adult Health 34
Hospitalist 34
Acute Care 25
Nurse Practitioner 24
Clinical 22

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $17.1M general $771,307 · research $16.3M
All years, 2019–2025 $110.1M 14,631 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 237 89 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $10.3M
  • 2020 $20.2M
  • 2021 $16.6M
  • 2022 $15.6M
  • 2023 $16.1M
  • 2024 $14.3M
  • 2025 $17.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $415,882 6
Speaking, teaching and other services $170,815 36
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $93,402 84
Debt forgiveness $52,019 15
Space rental and facility fees $38,838 27
Food and beverage $350 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2.6M 41
Incyte Corporation $2.2M 657
Taiho Oncology, INC. $1.4M 105
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1.2M 751
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $1M 26
Celgene Corporation $772,859 6
Sanofi US Services INC. $740,340 45
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $540,569 13

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Multi-phase, Dose-Escalation Followed by an Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study of Oral ASTX030 (Cedazuridine and Azacitidine Given in Combinat… TAIHO ONCOLOGY, INC. $975,439
AC220-168 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. · NCT06578247 $954,609
A Phase 1/2, Open Label, First-in-human, Dose Escalation and Expansion Study for the Evaluation of Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and An… SANOFI US SERVICES INC. · NCT05584670 $735,440
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of INCB161734 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors With KRAS G12D Mutation Incyte Corporation $734,484
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of INCA33890 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Incyte Corporation $676,134
A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label Trial to Assess the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody-CD3xCD20) in Combination With Other Age… Genmab A/S $515,402
A phase II study of Iberdomide (CC-220) in combination with Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplant … Celgene Corporation $427,568
A Phase 1/2a, Multicenter, Open-label, First in Human Study of BMS-986490 with or without Bevacizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $403,069

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Hackensack University Medical Center

Is Hackensack University Medical Center a good hospital?

Hackensack University Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 12 and worse on 4. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Hackensack University Medical Center?

74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 4,034 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Hackensack University Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 22 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Hackensack University Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $17.1M in payments to Hackensack University Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.