USCareCheck

CMS certification 320001

Unm Hospital

2211 Lomas Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Unm Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. 66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 23 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 33 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 2/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 66% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 2/5 1,884 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 23 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,884 completed surveys, 12% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
66%
NM 66% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
63%
NM 69% · US 72% · 2 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
74%
NM 78% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
NM 78% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
NM 62% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
NM 83% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
61%
NM 72% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
43%
NM 60% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New Mexico average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NM US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 314 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 33 min 2 h 43 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 26 visits sampled 5 h 34 min 4 h 34 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 79,884 patients 2% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 94 patients 76% 50% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 240 patients 45% 54% 65%

How Unm Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Unm HospitalThis hospital2/566%4 h 33 min4 better 1 worse
Presbyterian HospitalSame city2/569%4 h 40 min5 better 3 worse
VA New Mexico Healthcare SystemSame city3/575%—2 better 3 worse
Lovelace Women's HospitalSame city4/565%3 h 25 min2 better
Lovelace Medical CenterSame city2/567%3 h 32 min4 better 3 worse
Lovelace Westside HospitalSame city4/574%2 h 39 min2 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Albuquerque.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,456 cases Too few cases 3.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 84 cases Too few cases 11% 11.9%
Heart failure 186 cases Too few cases 8.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 220 cases Too few cases 15% 15.2%
Stroke 634 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11.9%
COPD 51 cases Too few cases 6.8% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

3 worse than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.51 likely 1.21 – 1.82 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 183 cases No different 197.29 per 1,000 likely 159.48 per 1,000 – 235.1 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 4,908 cases Worse 2.05 per 1,000 likely 1.47 per 1,000 – 2.63 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 4,976 cases No different 0.21 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 5,104 cases No different 0.29 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,423 cases No different 2.75 per 1,000 likely 1.37 per 1,000 – 4.13 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 546 cases No different 2.25 per 1,000 likely 0.64 per 1,000 – 3.86 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 497 cases No different 7.43 per 1,000 likely 0.31 per 1,000 – 14.54 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,475 cases Worse 6.01 per 1,000 likely 4.08 per 1,000 – 7.94 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 531 cases No different 5.65 per 1,000 likely 2.27 per 1,000 – 9.04 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 433 cases No different 2.08 per 1,000 likely 0.67 per 1,000 – 3.49 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,174 cases No different 0.96 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 1.88 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

6 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.88 likely 0.56 – 1.32 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.68 likely 0.43 – 1.02 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.58 likely 0.98 – 2.42 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.46 likely 0.02 – 2.25 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.94 likely 0.56 – 1.49 1
C. diff intestinal infections No different 0.88 likely 0.72 – 1.07 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 155 cases Too few cases 14.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 416 cases Too few cases 18.5% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 506 cases Too few cases 17.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 180 cases Too few cases 20.1% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 35 cases Too few cases 11.7% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 80 cases Too few cases -1.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 204 cases Too few cases 8.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 221 cases Too few cases 5.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 930 cases No different 11.4 per 1,000 likely 8.6 per 1,000 – 14.9 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 410 cases No different 9 per 100 likely 6.9 per 100 – 11.6 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 410 cases No different 5.4 per 100 likely 3.9 per 100 – 7.3 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 717 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.7 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

890 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 94 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Physician Assistant 79
Family 57
Acute Care 52
Pediatrics 50
Anesthesiologist Assistant 41
Nurse Practitioner 34
Anesthesiology 31
Speech-Language Pathologist 27
Internal Medicine 25
Emergency Medicine 21
Diagnostic Radiology 19
Advanced Practice Midwife 17

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $272,802 general $137,931 · research $134,871
All years, 2019–2025 $6.5M 496 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 11 9 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $900,002
  • 2020 $3.1M
  • 2021 $222,333
  • 2022 $330,540
  • 2023 $1.4M
  • 2024 $310,586
  • 2025 $272,802

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $135,431 14
Speaking, teaching and other services $2,500 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Intuitive Surgical, INC. $105,200 12
Roche Molecular Systems, INC. $63,308 3
AngioDynamics, Inc. $30,000 1
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $26,656 1
Incyte Corporation $17,638 13
Ventana Medical Systems, INC. $14,533 2
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $12,736 8
Sterilmed, Inc. $2,500 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
RD007117 ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. $77,841
Testing the Addition of an IDH2 Inhibitor, Enasidenib, to Usual Treatment (Cedazuridine-Decitabine) for Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Wi… E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. · NCT06577441 $26,656
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Study of Povorcitinib in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (STOP-PN1) Incyte Corporation $17,128
A Phase II Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Dose Escalation Study of Asciminib Monotherapy in 2nd Line Chronic Phase - Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $11,266
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Remibrutinib After Switching From Ocr… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $759
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Povorcitinib (INCB054707) in Participants With Moderate to Seve… Incyte Corporation $510
An Open label Single Arm Multi center Extension Study Evaluating Long term Safety Tolerability and Effectiveness of Ofatumumab in Subjects With Relap… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $240
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remibrutinib in patients with secondary progressive multi… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $201

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Unm Hospital

Is Unm Hospital a good hospital?

Unm Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. Of the 23 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Unm Hospital?

66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,884 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Unm Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 33 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Unm Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $272,802 in payments to Unm Hospital for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.