USCareCheck

CMS certification 340030

Duke University Hospital

2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Duke University Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 10 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 5 h 17 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 80% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 1,341 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 10 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,341 completed surveys, 22% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
80%
NC 70% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
78%
NC 71% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
81%
NC 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
82%
NC 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
63%
NC 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
NC 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
65%
NC 71% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
58%
NC 60% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital North Carolina average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NC US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 435 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 5 h 17 min 3 h 7 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 14 visits sampled 6 h 57 min 5 h 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 112,076 patients 5% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 15 patients 73% 71% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 169 patients 49% 64% 65%

How Duke University Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Duke University HospitalThis hospital5/580%5 h 17 min10 better 1 worse
Durham VA Medical CenterSame city4/575%—4 better 1 worse
Duke Regional HospitalSame city5/576%4 h 15 min4 better 1 worse
North Carolina Specialty HospitalSame cityNot rated84%—1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Durham.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 10,510 cases Too few cases 2.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 351 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 814 cases Too few cases 9.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 530 cases Too few cases 9.6% 15.2%
Stroke 684 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.9%
COPD 175 cases Too few cases 6.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 277 cases Too few cases 1.6% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

3 worse than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.1 likely 0.94 – 1.26 1
After hip or knee replacement 293 cases Too few cases 4.9% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 366 cases Worse 216.01 per 1,000 likely 186.77 per 1,000 – 245.25 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 14,819 cases No different 0.5 per 1,000 likely 0.15 per 1,000 – 0.85 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 15,279 cases No different 0.16 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.32 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 16,992 cases No different 0.2 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.36 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 5,880 cases No different 2.62 per 1,000 likely 1.69 per 1,000 – 3.56 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 3,680 cases Worse 2.95 per 1,000 likely 2.11 per 1,000 – 3.79 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,482 cases No different 8.88 per 1,000 likely 6.29 per 1,000 – 11.47 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 6,581 cases Worse 5.5 per 1,000 likely 4.26 per 1,000 – 6.75 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 3,644 cases No different 5.96 per 1,000 likely 4.07 per 1,000 – 7.84 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,495 cases No different 2.49 per 1,000 likely 1.26 per 1,000 – 3.72 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,083 cases No different 0.91 per 1,000 likely 0.21 per 1,000 – 1.61 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.73 likely 0.57 – 0.92 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.37 likely 0.25 – 0.55 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.05 likely 0.68 – 1.55 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.37 likely 0.44 – 3.31 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.59 likely 0.4 – 0.86 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.4 likely 0.32 – 0.49 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 688 cases Too few cases 12.7% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,551 cases Too few cases 20.6% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 861 cases Too few cases 15.9% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 367 cases Too few cases 20.1% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 312 cases Too few cases 9.7% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 320 cases Too few cases 5.9% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 428 cases Too few cases 7.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 963 cases Too few cases -20.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 554 cases Too few cases -14.2 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 2,489 cases No different 12.7 per 1,000 likely 10.2 per 1,000 – 16 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 2,101 cases Better 8.6 per 100 likely 7.5 per 100 – 9.8 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 2,101 cases No different 4.9 per 100 likely 4.1 per 100 – 5.8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,623 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.8 – 1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,035 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 1,026 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Diagnostic Radiology 109
Physical Therapist 76
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 63
Internal Medicine 57
Physician Assistant 54
Occupational Therapist 48
Acute Care 43
Pediatrics 38
Emergency Medicine 36
Anesthesiology 35
Nurse Practitioner 32
Registered Nurse 24

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $4.1M general $1.7M · research $2.4M
All years, 2019–2025 $72.1M 3,809 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 66 52 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $33.5M
  • 2020 $4.3M
  • 2021 $4.5M
  • 2022 $5.8M
  • 2023 $8.7M
  • 2024 $11.3M
  • 2025 $4.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $732,085 17
Consulting fees $401,217 25
Space rental and facility fees $259,434 18
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $104,012 15
Education $72,613 8
Debt forgiveness $52,430 16
Royalties and licensing fees $44,927 12
Speaking, teaching and other services $39,032 10
Gifts $695 1
Food and beverage $358 2

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $670,169 24
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $446,391 36
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $401,217 25
Transmedics, INC. $261,421 18
Paragon 28, Inc. $257,740 7
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $223,950 8
Exactech, INC. $208,972 13
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $180,470 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
The OCS Liver Perfusion (OLP?II) Registr TRANSMEDICS, INC. $190,856
STUDY NAME#A Study of DapansutRile Plus PEmbrolizumab in Patients with PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma DREAM Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $180,470
CR16-002 VANTAGE TOTAL ANKLE STUDY-FIXED EXACTECH, INC. $167,169
Trial of Sequential Medications After TNFi failure in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis SMART JIA Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $160,536
Safety and Efficacy of XPERIENCE Irrigation Solution to Prevent Fracture Related Infection: a Preclinical Study Osteoremedies, LLC $142,755
Acumen HPI Smart Alerts and Smart Trends to Improve Compliance With an Intra-operative Hemodynamic Management Algorithm and Reduce Renal Injury Follo… Becton, Dickinson and Company $140,848
A Prospective Cohort Post Market Registry Evaluating Outcomes of Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR) Miach Orthopaedics, Inc. · NCT05398341 $91,954
Expansion of the Duke Molecular Tumor Board to community oncology sites across theSoutheast to support adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling an… TAIHO ONCOLOGY, INC. $74,964

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Duke University Hospital

Is Duke University Hospital a good hospital?

Duke University Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 10 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Duke University Hospital?

80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,341 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Duke University Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 5 h 17 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 5% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Duke University Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $4.1M in payments to Duke University Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.