USCareCheck

CMS certification 370114

Ascension St John Medical Center

1923 South Utica Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74104

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Ascension St John Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 60% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 17 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 60% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 2/5 456 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 2 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 456 completed surveys, 15% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
60%
OK 74% · US 71% · 2 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
57%
OK 73% · US 72% · 2 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
68%
OK 81% · US 80% · 1 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
70%
OK 81% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
52%
OK 63% · US 62% · 1 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
80%
OK 87% · US 86% · 2 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
61%
OK 74% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
48%
OK 66% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Oklahoma average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital OK US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 381 visits sampled 3 h 17 min 1 h 57 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 18 visits sampled 4 h 33 min 2 h 54 min 4 h 17 min
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 729 patients 47% 61% 65%

How Ascension St John Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Ascension St John Medical CenterThis hospital3/560%3 h 17 min2 better 2 worse
Hillcrest Medical CenterSame city3/567%3 h 43 min3 better 3 worse
Oklahoma State University Medical CenterSame city2/573%1 h 45 min2 better 2 worse
Tulsa Spine & Specialty HospitalSame cityNot rated91%3 h 11 min1 worse
Council Oak Comprehensive HealthcareSame cityNot rated86%—No different
Hillcrest Hospital SouthSame city3/571%3 h 5 min6 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Tulsa.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,977 cases Too few cases 4.4% 3.9%
Heart attack 183 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 363 cases Too few cases 11.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 372 cases Too few cases 16.7% 15.2%
Stroke 399 cases Too few cases 14.7% 11.9%
COPD 107 cases Too few cases 6.9% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 52 cases Too few cases 2.3% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.11 likely 0.85 – 1.38 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 185 cases No different 185.19 per 1,000 likely 147.76 per 1,000 – 222.61 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 6,444 cases No different 0.2 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.72 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 7,813 cases No different 0.28 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 7,768 cases No different 0.4 per 1,000 likely 0.22 per 1,000 – 0.59 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,221 cases No different 2.18 per 1,000 likely 0.9 per 1,000 – 3.45 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 810 cases No different 2.03 per 1,000 likely 0.5 per 1,000 – 3.56 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 805 cases Worse 15.23 per 1,000 likely 9.47 per 1,000 – 20.99 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,364 cases No different 2.54 per 1,000 likely 0.84 per 1,000 – 4.25 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 841 cases No different 7.57 per 1,000 likely 4.35 per 1,000 – 10.79 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 619 cases No different 1.43 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 2.8 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,813 cases No different 1.16 per 1,000 likely 0.31 per 1,000 – 2 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 worse than the nation 3 better than the nation 1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.88 likely 0.58 – 1.27 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.49 likely 0.28 – 0.8 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 2.01 likely 1.36 – 2.86 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy Worse 2.05 likely 1.04 – 3.66 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.38 likely 0.14 – 0.84 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.34 likely 0.23 – 0.48 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 248 cases Too few cases 14.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 551 cases Too few cases 21.5% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 577 cases Too few cases 18.6% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 179 cases Too few cases 20.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 51 cases Too few cases 10.5% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 208 cases Too few cases -14.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 433 cases Too few cases -0.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 416 cases Too few cases -0.8 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 578 cases No different 12 per 1,000 likely 9.1 per 1,000 – 16 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 100 cases No different 1.1 likely 0.8 – 1.6 —

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

224 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 25
Emergency Medicine 20
Acute Care 19
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 18
Internal Medicine 16
Religious Nonmedical Practitioner 12
Family 11
Cardiovascular Disease 10
Physician Assistant 9
Pharmacist 8
Anesthesiologist Assistant 7
Nurse Practitioner 5

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $3,879 general $2,679 · research $1,200
All years, 2019–2025 $362,694 200 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 1 2 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $106,422
  • 2020 $55,255
  • 2021 $117,680
  • 2022 $29,975
  • 2023 $35,317
  • 2024 $14,166
  • 2025 $3,879

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $1,580 2
Debt forgiveness $1,099 2

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Stryker Corporation $2,679 4
Shockwave Medical, Inc $1,200 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Efficacy of the COronary SInus Reducer in Patients With Refractory Angina II Shockwave Medical, Inc $1,200

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Ascension St John Medical Center

Is Ascension St John Medical Center a good hospital?

Ascension St John Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Ascension St John Medical Center?

60% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 456 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Ascension St John Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 17 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Ascension St John Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $3,879 in payments to Ascension St John Medical Center for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.