USCareCheck

CMS certification 440015

University Health System, INC

1924 Alcoa Highway, Knoxville, TN 37920

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 77% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 9 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 77% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,645 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 7 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,645 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
77%
TN 70% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
73%
TN 71% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
TN 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
TN 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
58%
TN 62% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
TN 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
64%
TN 72% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
59%
TN 63% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Tennessee average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TN US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 394 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 9 min 2 h 42 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 21 visits sampled 12 h 33 min 5 h 8 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 79,199 patients 0% 3% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 17 patients 71% 69% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 142 patients 53% 59% 65%

How University Health System compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University Health System, INCThis hospital4/577%4 h 9 min7 better 3 worse
Parkwest Medical CenterSame city3/573%4 h 19 min2 better 1 worse
Fort Sanders Regional Medical CenterSame city3/568%3 h 54 min5 better 2 worse
Physicians Regional Medical CenterSame county · Powell3/566%3 h 16 min3 better 3 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Knoxville.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,822 cases Too few cases 3.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 172 cases Too few cases 13.1% 11.9%
Heart failure 594 cases Too few cases 11% 11.1%
Pneumonia 789 cases Too few cases 15.8% 15.2%
Stroke 884 cases Too few cases 12% 11.9%
COPD 152 cases Too few cases 7.3% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 125 cases Too few cases 1.9% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

4 worse than the nation 8 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.44 likely 1.21 – 1.66 1
After hip or knee replacement 77 cases Too few cases 4.4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 354 cases Worse 218.76 per 1,000 likely 187.01 per 1,000 – 250.5 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 9,199 cases Worse 1.78 per 1,000 likely 1.3 per 1,000 – 2.26 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 11,971 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.45 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 12,153 cases Worse 0.47 per 1,000 likely 0.3 per 1,000 – 0.65 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,577 cases No different 3.27 per 1,000 likely 2.11 per 1,000 – 4.42 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,688 cases No different 1.26 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.58 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,582 cases No different 9.5 per 1,000 likely 5.11 per 1,000 – 13.89 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,895 cases No different 4.04 per 1,000 likely 2.5 per 1,000 – 5.59 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,624 cases No different 6.41 per 1,000 likely 3.78 per 1,000 – 9.04 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 761 cases No different 2.51 per 1,000 likely 1.15 per 1,000 – 3.88 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,368 cases No different 0.89 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 1.7 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.52 likely 0.29 – 0.86 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.33 likely 0.19 – 0.53 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.45 likely 0.2 – 0.89 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.56 likely 0.03 – 2.74 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.98 likely 0.62 – 1.47 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.35 likely 0.25 – 0.47 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 331 cases Too few cases 14.7% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,165 cases Too few cases 20.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,517 cases Too few cases 16.7% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 369 cases Too few cases 19% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 194 cases Too few cases 9% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 76 cases Too few cases 5.5% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 169 cases Too few cases -9.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 713 cases Too few cases -18.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 884 cases Too few cases 4.2 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 2,004 cases No different 11.8 per 1,000 likely 9.2 per 1,000 – 15.1 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 744 cases No different 11.4 per 100 likely 9.6 per 100 – 13.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 744 cases No different 4.5 per 100 likely 3.4 per 100 – 5.8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,378 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.7 – 1.1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

572 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 275 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 73
Hospitalist 55
Anesthesiology 53
Diagnostic Radiology 43
Emergency Medicine 33
Family 31
Family Medicine 29
Pharmacist 27
Internal Medicine 21
Nurse Practitioner 19
Acute Care 16
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 16

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $3.8M general $258,645 · research $3.6M
All years, 2019–2025 $15.5M 2,561 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 68 54 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $2.1M
  • 2020 $1.6M
  • 2021 $1.7M
  • 2022 $1.8M
  • 2023 $2.3M
  • 2024 $2.2M
  • 2025 $3.8M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $127,373 13
Space rental and facility fees $65,906 28
Grants $31,800 7
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $21,429 3
Consulting fees $6,192 3
Education $5,000 1
Food and beverage $539 4
Gifts $374 1
Debt forgiveness $32 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $852,929 369
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $544,700 15
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $502,013 8
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $316,615 67
BioNTech SE $224,842 44
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $195,744 2
Genmab A/S $159,903 60
Cleerly, Inc. $124,934 28

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A PHASE 3 TRIAL OF FIANLIMAB (ANTI-LAG-3) AND CEMIPLIMAB VERSUS PEMBROLIZUMAB IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING IN PATIENTS WITH COMPLETELY RESECTED HIGH-RISK … Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT05608291 $472,798
An Open-label, Randomized Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Belzutifan MK-6482 and Lenvatini… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $380,204
A RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 PLATFORM STUDY TO EVALUATE CEMIPLIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS CEMIPLIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS OTHER CANCER TREATMENTS FOR THE… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT06465329 $223,769
A Randomized, Open Label, Multi-center, Active-comparator Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety & Tolerability of Ofatumumab 20mg sc Monthly Versus Contin… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $195,744
A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial of Acasunlimab (GEN1046) in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Subjects With PD-… Genmab A/S $159,903
BNT327-03 BioNTech SE $149,935
A Phase 2b, Open-Label, Two-cohort Study of Subcutaneous Amivantamab in Combination with Lazertinib as First-Line Treatment, or Subcutaneous Amivanta… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $122,535
A Phase 3 Randomized Open-Label Study of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab With or Without MK-2870 in Participants With Resectable Stage II to IIIB N2 NSCLC not… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $102,712

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University Health System

Is University Health System a good hospital?

University Health System has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University Health System?

77% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,645 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University Health System emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 9 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University Health System receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $3.8M in payments to University Health System for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.