CMS certification 450039
Jps Health Network
1500 S Main St, Fort Worth, TX 76104
Jps Health Network has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 21 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 12 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).
Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.
What patients said
Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,442 completed surveys, 22% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
Emergency department
How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
| Measure | This hospital | TX | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 350 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min | 3 h 12 min | 2 h 25 min | 2 h 42 min |
| Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 66 visits sampled | 3 h 22 min | 3 h 53 min | 4 h 17 min |
| Left before being seen Lower is better · 135,647 patients | 2% | 1% | 2% |
| Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 1,293 patients | 85% | 68% | 65% |
How Jps Health Network compares with nearby hospitals
The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.
| Hospital | CMS stars | Would recommend | ER median time | Vs the nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jps Health NetworkThis hospital | 4/5 | 71% | 3 h 12 min | 2 better 2 worse |
| Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical CenterSame city | 4/5 | 74% | 3 h 53 min | 3 better 3 worse |
| Medical City Fort WorthSame city | 2/5 | 68% | 1 h 54 min | 2 better 5 worse |
| Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort WorthSame city | 4/5 | 76% | 2 h 49 min | 7 better 1 worse |
| Baylor Scott and White Surgical Hospital FortworthSame city | Not rated | 74% | 1 h 50 min | 2 worse |
| Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth SouthSame city | 3/5 | 73% | 3 h 8 min | 2 better 1 worse |
Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Fort Worth.
Deaths
How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| All patients, hospital-wide 1,775 cases | Too few cases | 3.6% | 3.9% |
| Heart failure 114 cases | Too few cases | 8.6% | 11.1% |
| Pneumonia 107 cases | Too few cases | 11.3% | 15.2% |
| Stroke 190 cases | Too few cases | 9.3% | 11.9% |
| COPD 57 cases | Too few cases | 9.3% | 8.6% |
2 more measures had too few cases here to report.
Complications
How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious complications, combined measure | No different | 1.09 likely 0.74 – 1.44 | 1 |
| Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 50 cases | No different | 180.2 per 1,000 likely 122.52 per 1,000 – 237.88 per 1,000 | 173.3 per 1,000 |
| Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 3,063 cases | No different | 1.11 per 1,000 likely 0.43 per 1,000 – 1.78 per 1,000 | 0.63 per 1,000 |
| Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 3,122 cases | No different | 0.18 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.41 per 1,000 | 0.21 per 1,000 |
| Broken bones from falls in the hospital 3,170 cases | No different | 0.28 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 | 0.27 per 1,000 |
| Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 725 cases | No different | 2.86 per 1,000 likely 1.33 per 1,000 – 4.39 per 1,000 | 2.34 per 1,000 |
| Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 144 cases | No different | 1.54 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.21 per 1,000 | 1.67 per 1,000 |
| Breathing failure after surgery 136 cases | No different | 10.13 per 1,000 likely 1.85 per 1,000 – 18.41 per 1,000 | 9.42 per 1,000 |
| Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 722 cases | No different | 2.54 per 1,000 likely 0.29 per 1,000 – 4.79 per 1,000 | 3.52 per 1,000 |
| Sepsis after surgery 137 cases | No different | 4.47 per 1,000 likely 0.46 per 1,000 – 8.48 per 1,000 | 5.27 per 1,000 |
| Surgical wound splitting open 112 cases | No different | 1.63 per 1,000 likely 0.16 per 1,000 – 3.1 per 1,000 | 1.77 per 1,000 |
| Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 590 cases | No different | 1.41 per 1,000 likely 0.4 per 1,000 – 2.42 per 1,000 | 1.06 per 1,000 |
1 more measure had too few cases here to report.
Infections caught in the hospital
Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) | No different | 1.29 likely 0.68 – 2.24 | 1 |
| Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) | No different | 0.66 likely 0.27 – 1.38 | 1 |
| Surgical site infections after colon surgery | Worse | 1.91 likely 1.06 – 3.18 | 1 |
| Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy | No different | 1.42 likely 0.24 – 4.7 | 1 |
| MRSA bloodstream infections | Better | 0.36 likely 0.15 – 0.75 | 1 |
| C. diff intestinal infections | Better | 0.23 likely 0.15 – 0.33 | 1 |
Readmissions and return visits
How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Readmitted after a heart attack 62 cases | Too few cases | 14.5% | 14.4% |
| Readmitted after heart failure 452 cases | Too few cases | 21.2% | 21.3% |
| Readmitted after pneumonia 317 cases | Too few cases | 16.7% | 17.3% |
| Readmitted after COPD 197 cases | Too few cases | 19.1% | 20% |
| Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 42 cases | Too few cases | 9.4% | 11% |
| Days back in hospital after heart failure 128 cases | Too few cases | 32.6 days per 100 | — |
| Days back in hospital after pneumonia 113 cases | Too few cases | 17 days per 100 | — |
| Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 281 cases | No different | 13.2 per 1,000 likely 9.9 per 1,000 – 17.7 per 1,000 | 13 per 1,000 |
| Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 69 cases | No different | 10 per 100 likely 7.2 per 100 – 13.9 per 100 | 10.7 per 100 |
| ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 69 cases | No different | 6.5 per 100 likely 4.4 per 100 – 9.8 per 100 | 5.4 per 100 |
| Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 70 cases | No different | 1 likely 0.7 – 1.5 | — |
3 more measures had too few cases here to report.
Clinicians registered at this address
726 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 285 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.
| Specialty | Clinicians |
|---|---|
| Family Medicine | 114 |
| Emergency Medicine | 97 |
| Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered | 72 |
| Physician Assistant | 38 |
| Family | 35 |
| Psychiatry | 34 |
| Internal Medicine | 31 |
| Acute Care | 28 |
| Psychiatric/Mental Health | 23 |
| Neonatal | 18 |
| Pharmacist | 16 |
| Pediatrics | 13 |
First 12 alphabetically
Money from drug and device companies
Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.
- 2019 $277,731
- 2020 $621,935
- 2021 $612,270
- 2022 $647,140
- 2023 $437,041
- 2024 $874,911
- 2025 $1.3M
What the 2025 general payments were for
| Type of payment | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan | $43,083 | 2 |
| Speaking, teaching and other services | $1,530 | 4 |
| Debt forgiveness | $860 | 1 |
Largest paying companies, 2025
| Company | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation | $293,176 | 5 |
| Abbvie INC. | $210,108 | 36 |
| AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $154,392 | 7 |
| E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. | $149,397 | 4 |
| Eli Lilly and Company | $120,602 | 3 |
| Genentech, Inc. | $114,156 | 8 |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | $69,664 | 2 |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. | $43,083 | 2 |
Largest research studies funded here, 2025
| Study | Amount |
|---|---|
| A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Remibrutinib Versus Teriflunomide in Participant… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation | $282,523 |
| EMBER-4: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3 STUDY OF ADJUVANT IMLUNESTRANT VS STANDARD ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECE… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT05514054 | $107,442 |
| Program to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity of Oral Upadacitinib in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Ery… ABBVIE INC. · NCT05843643 | $97,031 |
| A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive KarXT in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Symptoms of Schizophrenia (ARISE) E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. | $83,430 |
| Efficacy and Safety of Inavolisib Phesgo vs Placebo Phesgo in PIK3CA Mutated HER2 BC Genentech, Inc. | $76,644 |
| An Extension Study to Assess Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Adjunctive KarXT in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Symptoms of Schizophrenia E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. | $62,974 |
| A Phase III Randomized Double blind Multicenter Global Study of Rilvegostomig or Pembrolizumab in Combination with Platinum based Chemotherapy for th… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP | $55,944 |
| Study to Assess Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Oral Upadacitinib Compared to Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Adult Participants With Mod… ABBVIE INC. · NCT05814627 | $55,922 |
Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.
How to read this page
- Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
- “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
- Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
- Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
- These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.
CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error
Common questions about Jps Health Network
Is Jps Health Network a good hospital?
Jps Health Network has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 21 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.
Would patients recommend Jps Health Network?
71% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,442 completed HCAHPS surveys.
How long is the wait in the Jps Health Network emergency room?
Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 12 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
Does Jps Health Network receive money from drug and device companies?
Drug and device makers reported $1.3M in payments to Jps Health Network for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.