USCareCheck

CMS certification 450137

Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center

1400 Eighth Ave, Fort Worth, TX 76104

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 53 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 74% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,160 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 3 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,160 completed surveys, 12% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
74%
TX 73% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
74%
TX 74% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
TX 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
TX 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
63%
TX 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
TX 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
67%
TX 76% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
56%
TX 66% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Texas average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TX US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 343 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min 3 h 53 min 2 h 25 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 14 visits sampled 3 h 28 min 3 h 53 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 51,580 patients 1% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 16 patients 94% 67% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 157 patients 80% 68% 65%

How Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical CenterThis hospital4/574%3 h 53 min3 better 3 worse
Jps Health NetworkSame city4/571%3 h 12 min2 better 2 worse
Medical City Fort WorthSame city2/568%1 h 54 min2 better 5 worse
Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort WorthSame city4/576%2 h 49 min7 better 1 worse
Baylor Scott and White Surgical Hospital FortworthSame cityNot rated74%1 h 50 min2 worse
Texas Health Huguley Hospital Fort Worth SouthSame city3/573%3 h 8 min2 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Fort Worth.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,123 cases Too few cases 2.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 60 cases Too few cases 12.2% 11.9%
Heart failure 266 cases Too few cases 8.3% 11.1%
Pneumonia 229 cases Too few cases 12.4% 15.2%
Stroke 168 cases Too few cases 11.1% 11.9%
COPD 132 cases Too few cases 8.8% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 84 cases Too few cases 2.1% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.23 likely 0.98 – 1.48 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 111 cases No different 189.05 per 1,000 likely 141.35 per 1,000 – 236.74 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 5,896 cases No different 0.78 per 1,000 likely 0.25 per 1,000 – 1.3 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 6,891 cases No different 0.14 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 7,520 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,660 cases No different 2.39 per 1,000 likely 1.15 per 1,000 – 3.63 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 794 cases No different 1.55 per 1,000 likely 0.24 per 1,000 – 2.86 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 771 cases Worse 15.84 per 1,000 likely 11.1 per 1,000 – 20.58 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,865 cases No different 2.72 per 1,000 likely 0.78 per 1,000 – 4.65 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 878 cases No different 7.31 per 1,000 likely 4.51 per 1,000 – 10.1 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 401 cases No different 1.86 per 1,000 likely 0.42 per 1,000 – 3.3 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,855 cases No different 1.12 per 1,000 likely 0.22 per 1,000 – 2.02 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 5 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.52 likely 0.19 – 1.14 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.52 likely 0.16 – 1.25 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.29 likely 0.02 – 1.44 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.33 likely 0.06 – 1.1 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.6 likely 0.22 – 1.32 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.08 likely 0.02 – 0.19 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 129 cases Too few cases 15% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 549 cases Too few cases 20.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 358 cases Too few cases 18.5% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 374 cases Too few cases 19.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 117 cases Too few cases 11.3% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 63 cases Too few cases 66.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 330 cases Too few cases 26.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 249 cases Too few cases 12 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 377 cases No different 14.2 per 1,000 likely 10.6 per 1,000 – 18.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 49 cases No different 11.1 per 100 likely 7.7 per 100 – 15.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 49 cases No different 5.3 per 100 likely 3.3 per 100 – 8.3 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 326 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.6 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $65,417 general $65,417 · research $0
All years, 2023–2025 $174,127 71 reported payments
  • 2023 $58,094
  • 2024 $50,616
  • 2025 $65,417

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Consulting fees $46,000 13
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $19,417 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
MIMEDX Group, Inc. $46,000 13
AngioDynamics, Inc. $19,417 1

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center

Is Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center a good hospital?

Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center?

74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,160 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 53 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $65,417 in payments to Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center for 2025, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.