USCareCheck

CMS certification 450051

Methodist Dallas Medical Center

1441 North Beckley Avenue, Dallas, TX 75203

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Methodist Dallas Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 20 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 49 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 74% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,126 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 2 better of 20 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,126 completed surveys, 13% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
74%
TX 73% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
75%
TX 74% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
80%
TX 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
80%
TX 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
TX 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
TX 86% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
77%
TX 76% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
59%
TX 66% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Texas average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TX US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 360 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 49 min 2 h 25 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 11 visits sampled 4 h 37 min 3 h 53 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 76,567 patients 2% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 16 patients 75% 67% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 164 patients 86% 68% 65%

How Methodist Dallas Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Methodist Dallas Medical CenterThis hospital3/574%3 h 49 min2 better 1 worse
Baylor Scott and White Medical Center UptownSame cityNot rated74%1 h 42 minNo different
Dallas VA Medical Center (VA North Texas Healthcare System)Same city3/563%—4 better 1 worse
White Rock Medical CenterSame city2/5—3 h 23 min1 worse
Baylor Scott & White Heart & Vascular Hospital - DallasSame city5/587%—2 worse
Medical City Dallas HospitalSame city3/566%2 h 20 min2 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Dallas.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,740 cases Too few cases 3.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 50 cases Too few cases 13.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 128 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 99 cases Too few cases 13.5% 15.2%
Stroke 373 cases Too few cases 11.5% 11.9%
COPD 50 cases Too few cases 6.9% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.04 likely 0.73 – 1.35 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 83 cases No different 207.49 per 1,000 likely 164.78 per 1,000 – 250.19 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 3,521 cases No different 0.34 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.02 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 3,795 cases No different 0.17 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.38 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 3,926 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.47 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,248 cases No different 3.74 per 1,000 likely 2.33 per 1,000 – 5.15 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 446 cases No different 1.77 per 1,000 likely 0.2 per 1,000 – 3.34 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 439 cases No different 10.29 per 1,000 likely 3.74 per 1,000 – 16.84 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,319 cases No different 4.58 per 1,000 likely 2.53 per 1,000 – 6.62 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 487 cases No different 6.44 per 1,000 likely 2.97 per 1,000 – 9.92 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 477 cases No different 1.51 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 2.93 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,104 cases No different 1.01 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 1.96 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.58 likely 0.27 – 1.1 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.58 likely 0.25 – 1.15 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.44 likely 0.67 – 2.74 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.88 likely 0.39 – 1.75 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.4 likely 0.25 – 0.59 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 171 cases Too few cases 13.3% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 483 cases Too few cases 19.6% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 300 cases Too few cases 15.7% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 174 cases Too few cases 18.4% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 43 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11%
Days back in hospital after heart failure 145 cases Too few cases 23.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 109 cases Too few cases -7.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 376 cases No different 13.4 per 1,000 likely 10.1 per 1,000 – 17.8 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 149 cases No different 1 likely 0.7 – 1.4 —

5 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

263 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 85 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 78
Acute Care 24
Pharmacist 18
Physician Assistant 18
Emergency Medicine 14
Family 10
Diagnostic Radiology 8
Surgery 8
Obstetrics & Gynecology 7
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 6
Pharmacotherapy 6
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 5

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $714,430 general $67,125 · research $647,305
All years, 2019–2025 $7.3M 1,659 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 14 23 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.3M
  • 2020 $2.7M
  • 2021 $501,019
  • 2022 $535,382
  • 2023 $971,211
  • 2024 $610,772
  • 2025 $714,430

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $47,852 9
Education $10,850 5
Space rental and facility fees $6,000 2
Debt forgiveness $1,922 4
Grants $500 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $303,887 145
Taiho Oncology, INC. $121,372 25
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $60,478 34
Ipsen Bioscience Inc. $46,889 59
AngioDynamics, Inc. $40,163 2
Amgen Inc. $26,083 1
Vantive US Healthcare LLC $25,324 5
Novocure GmbH $19,600 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A 52-WEEK, PHASE 3, OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION STUDY, WITH A DOUBLE-BLIND LEAD-IN, TO EVALUATE SAFETY AND BIOMARKERS OF RESMETIROM (MGL-3196) IN PATIENTS W… Madrigal Pharmaceuticals · NCT04951219 $182,784
Phase 2 Study of Futibatinib 20 mg and 16 mg in Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With FGFR2 Fusions or Rearrangements TAIHO ONCOLOGY, INC. $121,372
A PHASE 3 MULTINATIONAL DOUBLEBLIND RANDOMIZED PLACEBOCONTROLLED STUDY OF MGL3196 RESMETIROM IN PATIENTS WITH NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS NASH AND F… Madrigal Pharmaceuticals · NCT03900429 $121,103
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of siRNA Gene Silencing for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohep… Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · NCT05519475 $60,478
Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled Study of Sotorasib, Panitumumab and FOLFIRI Versus FOLFIRI With or Without Bevacizumab… Amgen Inc. $26,083
EF-44 Pivotal, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields, 150 kHz) Concomitant With Pembrolizumab and Platinum-based Chemothera… Novocure GmbH $26,000
A Safety Evaluation of Prismocitrate 18 in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) Vantive US Healthcare LLC · NCT05399537 $25,324
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study and Open-label Long Term Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor 80 mg in P… Ipsen Bioscience Inc. · NCT04526665 $24,037

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Is Methodist Dallas Medical Center a good hospital?

Methodist Dallas Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 20 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Methodist Dallas Medical Center?

74% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,126 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Methodist Dallas Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 49 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Methodist Dallas Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $714,430 in payments to Methodist Dallas Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.