USCareCheck

CMS certification 460010

Intermountain Medical Center

5121 South Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT 84107

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Intermountain Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 78% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 9 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 38 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 78% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,383 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 9 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,383 completed surveys, 25% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
78%
UT 77% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
76%
UT 78% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
UT 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
UT 82% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
UT 63% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
88%
UT 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
79%
UT 79% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
53%
UT 62% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Utah average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital UT US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 449 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 38 min 2 h 13 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 35 visits sampled 3 h 57 min 3 h 25 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 91,221 patients 1% 1% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 21 patients 43% 69% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 174 patients 41% 68% 65%

How Intermountain Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Intermountain Medical CenterThis hospital5/578%3 h 38 min9 better
Holy Cross Hospital - Salt LakeSame county · Salt Lake City3/566%2 h 26 min1 better
Intermountain Health Alta View HospitalSame county · Sandy5/580%3 h 2 min2 better
St Mark's HospitalSame county · Salt Lake City4/572%1 h 49 min5 better
Holy Cross Hospital-Jordan ValleySame county · West Jordan4/562%2 h 40 min3 better
University of Utah Hospital and ClinicsSame county · Salt Lake City5/583%3 h 54 min7 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,146 cases Too few cases 3.2% 3.9%
Heart attack 306 cases Too few cases 9% 11.9%
Heart failure 613 cases Too few cases 10.9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 353 cases Too few cases 14.8% 15.2%
Stroke 705 cases Too few cases 13.1% 11.9%
COPD 69 cases Too few cases 7.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 84 cases Too few cases 2.1% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.86 likely 0.63 – 1.09 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 185 cases No different 166.02 per 1,000 likely 125.43 per 1,000 – 206.62 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,132 cases No different 0.7 per 1,000 likely 0.2 per 1,000 – 1.19 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 8,688 cases No different 0.2 per 1,000 likely 0.02 per 1,000 – 0.38 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 9,038 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,938 cases No different 2.38 per 1,000 likely 1.18 per 1,000 – 3.57 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,281 cases No different 1.75 per 1,000 likely 0.56 per 1,000 – 2.94 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,300 cases No different 7.14 per 1,000 likely 2.82 per 1,000 – 11.46 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 3,287 cases No different 3.19 per 1,000 likely 1.59 per 1,000 – 4.79 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,387 cases No different 3.28 per 1,000 likely 0.68 per 1,000 – 5.88 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 847 cases No different 1.3 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.62 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,129 cases No different 0.77 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.6 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.5 likely 0.29 – 0.82 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.54 likely 0.32 – 0.85 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0.26 likely 0.07 – 0.7 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.67 likely 0.31 – 1.28 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.35 likely 0.24 – 0.48 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 551 cases Too few cases 11.7% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,150 cases Too few cases 18.1% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 646 cases Too few cases 14.6% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 157 cases Too few cases 19.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 118 cases Too few cases 11.5% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 370 cases Too few cases -46 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 697 cases Too few cases -63.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 365 cases Too few cases -48.4 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,438 cases No different 11.7 per 1,000 likely 9 per 1,000 – 15.3 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 206 cases No different 9 per 100 likely 6.5 per 100 – 12.4 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 206 cases No different 6.3 per 100 likely 4.3 per 100 – 9.1 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 770 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.7 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

638 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 21 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Physical Therapist 53
Occupational Therapist 50
Nurse Practitioner 43
Emergency Medicine 42
Anesthesiology 40
Physician Assistant 39
Hospitalist 38
Acute Care 26
Speech-Language Pathologist 26
Dietitian, Registered 21
Critical Care Medicine 20
Family 20

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2M general $132,189 · research $1.9M
All years, 2019–2025 $15.9M 1,848 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 59 25 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.9M
  • 2020 $3.2M
  • 2021 $2M
  • 2022 $1.9M
  • 2023 $1.8M
  • 2024 $3.1M
  • 2025 $2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $47,960 1
Grants $29,129 4
Space rental and facility fees $25,900 10
Consulting fees $15,200 2
Speaking, teaching and other services $14,000 11

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $524,121 8
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $398,869 79
Abbvie INC. $383,715 45
Celgene Corporation $138,222 5
Amgen Inc. $117,709 5
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $60,204 6
Pi-Cardia, Inc. $52,600 1
Procyrion, Inc. $50,195 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Sotatercept versus Placebo for the Treatment of Combined Pos… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $194,322
An Open-Label Phase 1a,1b Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study Investigating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Activity of AB248 Alo… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $158,400
THE ENCIRCLE Trial (#2018-19) Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $121,136
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-blind, Extension Study to Evaluate the Effects of Sotatercept for the Treatment of Combined Postcapillary and Precapil… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $118,421
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AMG 509 in Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prost… Amgen Inc. $108,221
Edwards Cardioband Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System Early Feasibility Study 2017-19 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $96,996
M20-638 - Study of Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Combination With Intravenous Rituximab and Oral Lenalidomide (R2) to Assess Adverse Events and Change … ABBVIE INC. $86,788
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Arlocabtagene Autoleucel (BMS-986393), a GPRC5D-directed CAR T Cell Therapy in Adult Participants with Re… Celgene Corporation $85,928

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Intermountain Medical Center

Is Intermountain Medical Center a good hospital?

Intermountain Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 9 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Intermountain Medical Center?

78% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,383 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Intermountain Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 38 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Intermountain Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2M in payments to Intermountain Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.