USCareCheck

CMS certification 490063

Inova Fairfax Hospital

3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA 22042

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Inova Fairfax Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 41 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 80% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 877 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 7 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 877 completed surveys, 22% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
80%
VA 70% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
77%
VA 72% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
VA 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
VA 80% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
VA 62% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
88%
VA 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
76%
VA 74% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
56%
VA 60% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital Virginia average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital VA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 375 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 2 h 41 min 2 h 41 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 23 visits sampled 5 h 20 min 4 h 2 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 200,692 patients 0% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 26 patients 42% 69% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 762 patients 81% 67% 65%

How Inova Fairfax Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Inova Fairfax HospitalThis hospital5/580%2 h 41 min7 better 2 worse
Inova Fair Oaks HospitalSame county · Fairfax5/579%2 h 52 min4 better 1 worse
Fort Belvoir Community HospitalSame county · Fort BelvoirNot rated89%2 h 37 min—
Inova Mount Vernon HospitalSame county · Alexandria4/573%2 h 30 min2 better 1 worse
Reston Hospital CenterSame county · Reston3/564%2 h 12 min1 better 3 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Falls Church.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 8,297 cases Too few cases 2.6% 3.9%
Heart attack 370 cases Too few cases 9.7% 11.9%
Heart failure 1,423 cases Too few cases 10.1% 11.1%
Pneumonia 1,212 cases Too few cases 12.6% 15.2%
Stroke 847 cases Too few cases 10.9% 11.9%
COPD 205 cases Too few cases 7.9% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 367 cases Too few cases 1.9% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 better than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.86 likely 0.7 – 1.02 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 436 cases No different 149.1 per 1,000 likely 122.38 per 1,000 – 175.82 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 18,592 cases Better 0.08 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 21,070 cases No different 0.14 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.28 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 22,620 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 6,582 cases No different 2.45 per 1,000 likely 1.53 per 1,000 – 3.37 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 3,681 cases No different 1.78 per 1,000 likely 0.87 per 1,000 – 2.69 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,557 cases No different 7.72 per 1,000 likely 5.02 per 1,000 – 10.42 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 7,218 cases No different 3.55 per 1,000 likely 2.34 per 1,000 – 4.75 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 3,672 cases No different 7.14 per 1,000 likely 5.1 per 1,000 – 9.18 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,556 cases No different 1.7 per 1,000 likely 0.43 per 1,000 – 2.97 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,823 cases No different 1.17 per 1,000 likely 0.5 per 1,000 – 1.84 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.57 likely 0.38 – 0.84 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.56 likely 0.37 – 0.82 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.67 likely 0.36 – 1.14 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.97 likely 0.53 – 1.65 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.5 likely 0.26 – 0.87 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.49 likely 0.41 – 0.59 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 546 cases Too few cases 12.5% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,625 cases Too few cases 20.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,266 cases Too few cases 16.9% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 255 cases Too few cases 17.7% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 270 cases Too few cases 10.2% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 521 cases Too few cases -12.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 1,633 cases Too few cases 1.3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 1,273 cases Too few cases 16.6 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,020 cases No different 11.3 per 1,000 likely 8.6 per 1,000 – 15 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,314 cases Worse 12.8 per 100 likely 11.1 per 100 – 14.7 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,314 cases No different 4.7 per 100 likely 3.8 per 100 – 5.9 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,648 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,531 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 156 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 139
Physician Assistant 106
Pediatrics 105
Internal Medicine 101
Family 79
Emergency Medicine 78
Anesthesiology 76
Nurse Practitioner 66
Surgery 60
Hospitalist 59
Obstetrics & Gynecology 50
Critical Care Medicine 42

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $7.6M general $690,949 · research $7M
All years, 2019–2025 $54.5M 4,916 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 105 60 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $8.5M
  • 2020 $10.3M
  • 2021 $8.2M
  • 2022 $6.1M
  • 2023 $6.9M
  • 2024 $6.9M
  • 2025 $7.6M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Consulting fees $500,400 92
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $81,082 7
Space rental and facility fees $67,168 22
Speaking, teaching and other services $34,809 14
Grants $5,500 3
Debt forgiveness $1,990 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $2.8M 47
Abbvie INC. $554,734 54
MIMEDX Group, Inc. $500,400 92
Roche Molecular Systems, INC. $486,084 12
Seagen INC. $477,119 23
Incyte Corporation $311,381 43
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $305,305 14
Genentech, Inc. $241,747 19

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy Following Surgery and Radi… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $648,061
RD005618 ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. $427,935
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical study of Adjuvant V940 mRNA-4157 Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Ad… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $381,918
Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Previously Treated Adult Participants Receiving Intravenous (IV) ABBV-400 With Unres… ABBVIE INC. · NCT06107413 $309,337
A PHASE 2 MULTICOHORT OPENLABEL MULTICENTER CLINICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DISITAMAB VEDOTIN RC48ADC ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WI… SEAGEN INC. $306,232
A PHASE 1/2 STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS, PHARMACODYNAMICS, AND EFFICACY OF SNDX-5613 IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL … Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $305,305
Adjuvant Therapy with Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected High Risk Stage II Melanoma# A Randomized, Double-blind Phase III Study KEYNOTE 716 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $280,836
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib E7080,MK-7902 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in P… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $245,575

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Inova Fairfax Hospital

Is Inova Fairfax Hospital a good hospital?

Inova Fairfax Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 7 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Inova Fairfax Hospital?

80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 877 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Inova Fairfax Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 41 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Inova Fairfax Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $7.6M in payments to Inova Fairfax Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.