CMS certification 520037
Marshfield Medical Center
611 St Joseph Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449
Marshfield Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars. 60% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 1 and worse on 5. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 46 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).
Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.
What patients said
Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,813 completed surveys, 31% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
Emergency department
How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
| Measure | This hospital | WI | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 585 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 22 min | 2 h 46 min | 2 h 17 min | 2 h 42 min |
| Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 16 visits sampled | 3 h 12 min | 3 h 23 min | 4 h 17 min |
| Left before being seen Lower is better · 45,838 patients | 0% | 2% | 2% |
| Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 382 patients | 76% | 72% | 65% |
How Marshfield Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals
The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.
| Hospital | CMS stars | Would recommend | ER median time | Vs the nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marshfield Medical CenterThis hospital | 1/5 | 60% | 2 h 46 min | 1 better 5 worse |
| Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics INCSame county · Wisconsin Rapids | 3/5 | 68% | 2 h 42 min | 1 better 1 worse |
| Aspirus Medford Hospital & Clinics, INCSame ZIP area · Medford | Not rated | 76% | 2 h 34 min | No different |
| Aspirus Merrill HospitalSame ZIP area · Merrill | Not rated | 62% | 2 h 3 min | — |
| Marshfield Medical Center - NeillsvilleSame ZIP area · Neillsville | Not rated | 76% | 1 h 52 min | No different |
| Marshfield Medical Center - WestonSame ZIP area · Weston | 3/5 | 76% | 2 h 23 min | 1 worse |
Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Marshfield.
Deaths
How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| All patients, hospital-wide 3,232 cases | Too few cases | 3.7% | 3.9% |
| Heart attack 148 cases | Too few cases | 12.5% | 11.9% |
| Heart failure 217 cases | Too few cases | 11.5% | 11.1% |
| Pneumonia 223 cases | Too few cases | 13.7% | 15.2% |
| Stroke 277 cases | Too few cases | 11% | 11.9% |
| COPD 64 cases | Too few cases | 7.2% | 8.6% |
| Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 61 cases | Too few cases | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Complications
How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious complications, combined measure | Worse | 1.79 likely 1.49 – 2.09 | 1 |
| After hip or knee replacement 68 cases | Too few cases | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 132 cases | Worse | 226.6 per 1,000 likely 185.52 per 1,000 – 267.69 per 1,000 | 173.3 per 1,000 |
| Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 3,698 cases | Worse | 2.49 per 1,000 likely 1.78 per 1,000 – 3.21 per 1,000 | 0.63 per 1,000 |
| Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 4,623 cases | No different | 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 | 0.21 per 1,000 |
| Broken bones from falls in the hospital 4,676 cases | No different | 0.34 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 0.54 per 1,000 | 0.27 per 1,000 |
| Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,668 cases | No different | 2.25 per 1,000 likely 0.89 per 1,000 – 3.6 per 1,000 | 2.34 per 1,000 |
| Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 717 cases | No different | 2.89 per 1,000 likely 1.43 per 1,000 – 4.35 per 1,000 | 1.67 per 1,000 |
| Breathing failure after surgery 695 cases | No different | 11.97 per 1,000 likely 6.36 per 1,000 – 17.59 per 1,000 | 9.42 per 1,000 |
| Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,671 cases | No different | 4.7 per 1,000 likely 2.7 per 1,000 – 6.71 per 1,000 | 3.52 per 1,000 |
| Sepsis after surgery 681 cases | No different | 6.42 per 1,000 likely 3.13 per 1,000 – 9.71 per 1,000 | 5.27 per 1,000 |
| Surgical wound splitting open 324 cases | No different | 1.55 per 1,000 likely 0.11 per 1,000 – 2.98 per 1,000 | 1.77 per 1,000 |
| Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,061 cases | No different | 1.86 per 1,000 likely 0.92 per 1,000 – 2.79 per 1,000 | 1.06 per 1,000 |
Infections caught in the hospital
Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) | Better | 0.34 likely 0.11 – 0.83 | 1 |
| Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) | Better | 0.32 likely 0.13 – 0.67 | 1 |
| Surgical site infections after colon surgery | No different | 0.42 likely 0.07 – 1.37 | 1 |
| MRSA bloodstream infections | Better | 0.18 likely 0.01 – 0.87 | 1 |
| C. diff intestinal infections | No different | 0.73 likely 0.49 – 1.06 | 1 |
1 more measure had too few cases here to report.
Readmissions and return visits
How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.
| Measure | CMS comparison | This hospital | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Readmitted after a heart attack 378 cases | Too few cases | 15.4% | 14.4% |
| Readmitted after heart failure 574 cases | Too few cases | 23.2% | 21.3% |
| Readmitted after pneumonia 465 cases | Too few cases | 19.3% | 17.3% |
| Readmitted after COPD 126 cases | Too few cases | 21.6% | 20% |
| Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 114 cases | Too few cases | 10.4% | 11% |
| Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 73 cases | Too few cases | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Days back in hospital after a heart attack 168 cases | Too few cases | 34.9 days per 100 | — |
| Days back in hospital after heart failure 264 cases | Too few cases | 36.9 days per 100 | — |
| Days back in hospital after pneumonia 250 cases | Too few cases | 73 days per 100 | — |
| Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,000 cases | No different | 15 per 1,000 likely 11.4 per 1,000 – 19.7 per 1,000 | 13 per 1,000 |
| Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 147 cases | No different | 10.9 per 100 likely 7.8 per 100 – 14.6 per 100 | 10.7 per 100 |
| ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 147 cases | No different | 5.3 per 100 likely 3.4 per 100 – 7.7 per 100 | 5.4 per 100 |
| Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 596 cases | Worse | 1.4 likely 1.1 – 1.8 | — |
1 more measure had too few cases here to report.
Clinicians registered at this address
65 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 3 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.
| Specialty | Clinicians |
|---|---|
| Occupational Therapist | 17 |
| Physical Therapist | 10 |
| Pharmacist | 9 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 6 |
| Dietitian, Registered | 4 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 4 |
| Addiction (Substance Use Disorder) | 3 |
| Pediatrics | 3 |
| Family | 2 |
| Music Therapist | 1 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 |
| Nutrition, Metabolic | 1 |
First 12 alphabetically
Money from drug and device companies
Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.
- 2019 $6,922
- 2020 $18,683
- 2021 $14,599
- 2022 $1,500
- 2023 $28,425
- 2024 $46,293
- 2025 $88,921
What the 2025 general payments were for
| Type of payment | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Debt forgiveness | $219 | 1 |
Largest paying companies, 2025
| Company | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. | $53,312 | 1 |
| Luminex Corporation | $34,854 | 1 |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | $536 | 14 |
| Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. | $219 | 1 |
Largest research studies funded here, 2025
| Study | Amount |
|---|---|
| Testing the Addition of an IDH2 Inhibitor, Enasidenib, to Usual Treatment (Cedazuridine-Decitabine) for Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Wi… E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. · NCT06577441 | $53,312 |
| ATL-CNS-001 VERIGENE II CNS Flex Panel Luminex Corporation | $34,854 |
| EMANATE: A Study of Setmelanotide in Patients With Specific Gene Variants in the MC4R Pathway Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | $536 |
Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.
How to read this page
- Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
- “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
- Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
- Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
- These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.
CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error
Common questions about Marshfield Medical Center
Is Marshfield Medical Center a good hospital?
Marshfield Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars. Of the 26 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 1 and worse on 5. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.
Would patients recommend Marshfield Medical Center?
60% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,813 completed HCAHPS surveys.
How long is the wait in the Marshfield Medical Center emergency room?
Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 46 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 22 min. 0% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.
Does Marshfield Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?
Drug and device makers reported $88,921 in payments to Marshfield Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.