USCareCheck

CMS certification 670025

Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano

1100 Allied Drive, Plano, TX 75093

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services

Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 88% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 15 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 40 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 88% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 2,065 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 5 better of 15 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,065 completed surveys, 33% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
88%
TX 73% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
87%
TX 74% · US 72% · 5 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
84%
TX 80% · US 80% · 5 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
83%
TX 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
67%
TX 63% · US 62% · 4 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
90%
TX 86% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
79%
TX 76% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
70%
TX 66% · US 60% · 5 of 5 stars

This hospital Texas average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as low; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital TX US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 383 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 2 h 3 min 2 h 40 min 2 h 25 min 2 h 42 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 10,117 patients 1% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 19 patients 42% 68% 65%

How Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital PlanoThis hospital4/588%2 h 40 min5 better
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center PlanoSame city4/583%3 h 26 min4 better
Texas Health Center for Diagnostics & Surgery PlanSame cityNot rated87%2 h 44 minNo different
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital PlanoSame city4/572%2 h 54 min3 better 2 worse
Legent Surgical Hospital PlanoSame cityNot rated75%——
Medical City PlanoSame city3/566%2 h 21 min3 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Plano.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 2,810 cases Too few cases 2% 3.9%
Heart attack 252 cases Too few cases 9.3% 11.9%
Heart failure 574 cases Too few cases 11% 11.1%
Pneumonia 35 cases Too few cases 12.1% 15.2%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 421 cases Too few cases 1.8% 2.4%

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 better than the nation 10 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Better 0.66 likely 0.44 – 0.88 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 117 cases No different 192.35 per 1,000 likely 145.06 per 1,000 – 239.64 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 4,058 cases No different 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.76 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 4,158 cases No different 0.17 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.36 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 5,689 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.45 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,340 cases No different 1.76 per 1,000 likely 0.61 per 1,000 – 2.91 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,862 cases No different 1.14 per 1,000 likely 0.23 per 1,000 – 2.06 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,848 cases Better 5.45 per 1,000 likely 2.72 per 1,000 – 8.18 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,937 cases No different 2.95 per 1,000 likely 1.11 per 1,000 – 4.79 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,964 cases No different 3.71 per 1,000 likely 1.31 per 1,000 – 6.11 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 82 cases No different 2.06 per 1,000 likely 0.55 per 1,000 – 3.57 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 509 cases No different 0.89 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.89 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 1.99 likely 0.33 – 6.59 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.19 likely 0.01 – 0.95 1

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 428 cases Too few cases 14.2% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 760 cases Too few cases 20.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 46 cases Too few cases 16.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 446 cases Too few cases 10.6% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 380 cases Too few cases 6.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 675 cases Too few cases -17.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 39 cases Too few cases -71.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 535 cases No different 1.2 likely 0.9 – 1.5 —

6 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

51 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 8 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Acute Care 18
Cardiovascular Disease 4
Interventional Cardiology 3
Adult Health 2
Anesthesiology 2
Family 2
Internal Medicine 2
Nurse Practitioner 2
Physician Assistant 2
Surgical 2
Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology 1
Family Medicine 1

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $438,249 general $67,751 · research $370,498
All years, 2021–2025 $1.5M 134 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 6 12 companies paid in total
  • 2021 $27,360
  • 2022 $70,509
  • 2023 $93,759
  • 2024 $834,852
  • 2025 $438,249

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $32,671 2
Space rental and facility fees $16,150 7
Consulting fees $13,225 7
Debt forgiveness $4,206 1
Speaking, teaching and other services $1,500 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Medtronic, Inc. $148,176 6
Endovascular Engineering Inc. $118,041 10
CathWorks, Inc. $104,354 14
AngioDynamics, Inc. $30,000 1
Terumo Medical Corporation $14,725 8
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $7,864 3
Biotronik INC. $4,206 1
Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $3,200 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
SPYRAL AFFIRM Medtronic, Inc. $124,676
Engulf Endovascular Engineering Inc. $118,041
ALL-RISE CathWorks, Inc. $104,354
Investigator Sponsored Research: 193648 Medtronic, Inc. $14,200
BAY 632521, RiOciguAt UseRs Registry The ROAR registry Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $7,864
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults with Symptomatic Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomy… E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,364

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano

Is Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano a good hospital?

Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 15 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano?

88% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,065 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 40 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with low patient volume, like this one, the median is 2 h 3 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $438,249 in payments to Baylor Scott & White the Heart Hospital Plano for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.