USCareCheck

CMS certification 050075

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond

275 West Macarthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94611

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 16 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2.

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 2/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 2,982 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 2 better of 16 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,982 completed surveys, 23% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
CA 69% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
69%
CA 68% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
73%
CA 76% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
CA 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
CA 59% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
86%
CA 85% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
71%
CA 72% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
48%
CA 48% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 158 patients 66% 70% 65%

How Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/RichmondThis hospital2/572%—2 better 2 worse
Alta Bates Summit Medical CenterSame city5/578%3 h 55 min9 better
Highland HospitalSame city1/570%3 h 2 min4 worse
Stanford Health Care Tri-ValleySame county · Pleasanton5/574%3 h 19 min6 better
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San LeandroSame county · San Leandro2/573%—1 better 1 worse
Eden Medical CenterSame county · Castro Valley4/575%3 h 14 min2 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Oakland.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,684 cases Too few cases 4.1% 3.9%
Heart attack 40 cases Too few cases 11.2% 11.9%
Heart failure 96 cases Too few cases 10.7% 11.1%
Pneumonia 94 cases Too few cases 16.7% 15.2%
Stroke 489 cases Too few cases 10.8% 11.9%
COPD 52 cases Too few cases 8.4% 8.6%

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.01 likely 0.62 – 1.4 1
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 2,133 cases No different 0.79 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.61 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 2,673 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.48 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 2,783 cases No different 0.33 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 0.54 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 359 cases No different 2.07 per 1,000 likely 0.44 per 1,000 – 3.71 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 146 cases No different 1.62 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.32 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 123 cases No different 7.63 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 16.81 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 381 cases No different 3.39 per 1,000 likely 0.96 per 1,000 – 5.81 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 146 cases No different 5.35 per 1,000 likely 1.31 per 1,000 – 9.38 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 115 cases No different 2.04 per 1,000 likely 0.54 per 1,000 – 3.55 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 443 cases No different 0.96 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.01 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.72 likely 0.41 – 1.17 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.56 likely 0.26 – 1.07 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 2.2 likely 1.23 – 3.67 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.88 likely 0.36 – 1.82 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.33 likely 0.21 – 0.51 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 312 cases Too few cases 13.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 974 cases Too few cases 24.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 819 cases Too few cases 20% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 262 cases Too few cases 20.3% 20%
Days back in hospital after heart failure 127 cases Too few cases 55.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 112 cases Too few cases 10 days per 100 —

8 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

803 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 229 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 121
Emergency Medicine 73
Pediatrics 58
Physical Therapist 53
Anesthesiology 34
Obstetrics & Gynecology 31
Family Medicine 28
Hospitalist 25
Psychiatry 21
Diagnostic Radiology 19
Clinical 13
Ophthalmology 13

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2M general $192,943 · research $1.8M
All years, 2019–2025 $24.4M 1,939 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 29 17 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $2.3M
  • 2020 $7.2M
  • 2021 $4.4M
  • 2022 $3.6M
  • 2023 $2.2M
  • 2024 $2.6M
  • 2025 $2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Consulting fees $111,837 5
Speaking, teaching and other services $78,562 1
Debt forgiveness $2,544 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $603,086 75
Celgene Corporation $536,663 1
Incyte Corporation $195,482 250
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $175,208 2
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $108,787 3
Chiesi USA, Inc. $97,437 2
Sanofi US Services INC. $78,562 1
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $48,269 3

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Real-World Patient Characteristics and Outcome in Lower-Risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) Celgene Corporation $536,663
ALLIANCE 2021-05 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $245,811
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Povorcitinib (INCB054707) in Participants With Moderate to Seve… Incyte Corporation $131,748
The PROGRESS Trial 2021-01 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $107,348
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant MK-2870 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Trea… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $101,273
Real World Esophageal Cancer KP Retrospective Study E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $99,980
Characteristics and Outcomes of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients in a Large, Integrated Delivery System E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $75,228
CLASP II TR Pivotal, Study No. 2019-07 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $70,854

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond

Is Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond a good hospital?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. Of the 16 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,982 completed HCAHPS surveys.

Does Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond have an emergency room?

Yes. CMS lists emergency services at Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond.

Does Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2M in payments to Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Oakland/Richmond for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.