USCareCheck

CMS certification 050438

Huntington Hospital

100 W California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91109

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

CMS does not publish an overall star rating for Huntington Hospital. 76% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 17 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 28 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating Not rated There were discrepancies in the data collection process.
Would definitely recommend 76% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,430 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 3 better of 17 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,430 completed surveys, 23% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
76%
CA 69% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
70%
CA 68% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
75%
CA 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
75%
CA 76% · US 80% · 2 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
CA 59% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
84%
CA 85% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
73%
CA 72% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
49%
CA 48% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital California average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital CA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 379 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 28 min 2 h 54 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 14 visits sampled 7 h 40 min 4 h 20 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 80,099 patients 4% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 11 patients 55% 74% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 223 patients 86% 70% 65%

How Huntington Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Huntington HospitalThis hospitalNot rated76%4 h 28 min3 better 2 worse
Glendale Mem Hospital & Hlth CenterSame county · Glendale4/567%3 h 16 min3 better 1 worse
Glendale Adventist Medical CenterSame county · Glendale4/569%3 h 3 min6 better 3 worse
USC Verdugo Hills HospitalSame county · Glendale4/565%4 h 3 min4 better 2 worse
USC Arcadia HospitalSame county · Arcadia3/562%4 h 18 min4 better 2 worse
UCLA West Valley Medical CenterSame county · West Hills2/553%2 h 52 min1 better 3 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Pasadena.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 5,850 cases Too few cases 2.9% 3.9%
Heart attack 171 cases Too few cases 8.8% 11.9%
Heart failure 475 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 822 cases Too few cases 10.7% 15.2%
Stroke 463 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
COPD 112 cases Too few cases 7.6% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 67 cases Too few cases 1.8% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.9 likely 0.63 – 1.17 1
After hip or knee replacement 269 cases Too few cases 4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 128 cases No different 149.43 per 1,000 likely 106.58 per 1,000 – 192.28 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 8,956 cases No different 0.56 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 1.09 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 10,123 cases No different 0.17 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.36 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 10,515 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.07 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,457 cases No different 2.77 per 1,000 likely 1.44 per 1,000 – 4.11 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,209 cases No different 1.32 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.86 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,211 cases No different 7.71 per 1,000 likely 1.95 per 1,000 – 13.48 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,613 cases No different 4.4 per 1,000 likely 2.67 per 1,000 – 6.13 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,189 cases No different 4.08 per 1,000 likely 0.8 per 1,000 – 7.36 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 825 cases No different 1.85 per 1,000 likely 0.42 per 1,000 – 3.29 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,225 cases No different 0.68 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.56 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.62 likely 0.27 – 1.23 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 1.45 likely 0.91 – 2.2 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.42 likely 0.11 – 1.15 1
C. diff intestinal infections No different 0.98 likely 0.77 – 1.23 1

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 253 cases Too few cases 13.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 846 cases Too few cases 18.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,144 cases Too few cases 17.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 201 cases Too few cases 19.4% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 87 cases Too few cases 10.1% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 260 cases Too few cases 6.1% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 176 cases Too few cases 5.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 542 cases Too few cases 20.1 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 864 cases Too few cases 9.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 365 cases No different 11.8 per 1,000 likely 8.8 per 1,000 – 15.8 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 25 cases No different 10.1 per 100 likely 6.9 per 100 – 15.2 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 25 cases No different 5.2 per 100 likely 3.2 per 100 – 8.5 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 786 cases No different 0.8 likely 0.6 – 1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $86,878 general $7,265 · research $79,613
All years, 2019–2025 $2.3M 550 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 8 6 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $369,689
  • 2020 $233,426
  • 2021 $88,683
  • 2022 $860,458
  • 2023 $544,998
  • 2024 $99,535
  • 2025 $86,878

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $6,027 3
Debt forgiveness $638 2
Space rental and facility fees $599 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Endovascular Engineering Inc. $29,274 10
Abbott Laboratories $23,801 11
Stryker Corporation $12,936 10
Pfizer INC. $10,000 1
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $7,207 5
Medtronic, Inc. $3,660 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
Engulf Endovascular Engineering Inc. $29,274
NCT04226547--Amplatzer Amulet LAAO vs. NOAC Abbott Laboratories $19,605
THE COMPASSHER2 TRIALS COMPREHENSIVE USE OF PATHOLOGIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT TO OPTIMIZE THERAPY IN HER2POSITIVE BREAST CANCER COMPASSHER2 RESIDUAL DIS… PFIZER INC. $10,000
Early-TAVR Trial #2016-07 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $7,207
HDE WINGSPAN Stryker Corporation · NCT02034058 $5,660
EMBOLISE Medtronic, Inc. $3,660
NCT05252702--Aveir DR i2i Study Abbott Laboratories $3,597
THE PEERLESS II STUDY Stryker Corporation · NCT06055920 $610

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Huntington Hospital

Is Huntington Hospital a good hospital?

CMS does not publish an overall star rating for Huntington Hospital. Of the 17 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Huntington Hospital?

76% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,430 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Huntington Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 28 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 4% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Huntington Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $86,878 in payments to Huntington Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.