USCareCheck

CMS certification 310014

Cooper University Hospital

1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Cooper University Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. 69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 4. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 2/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 69% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 2,158 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 4 worse 2 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,158 completed surveys, 18% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
69%
NJ 65% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
68%
NJ 65% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
NJ 76% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
NJ 75% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
56%
NJ 58% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
84%
NJ 83% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
61%
NJ 69% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
44%
NJ 49% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New Jersey average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NJ US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 355 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 25 min 3 h 6 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 34 visits sampled 4 h 39 min 4 h 52 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 86,824 patients 3% 2% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 113 patients 80% 73% 65%

How Cooper University Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Cooper University HospitalThis hospital2/569%3 h 25 min2 better 4 worse
Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes HospitalSame city2/559%2 h 48 min1 better 1 worse
Jefferson Stratford HospitalSame county · Stratford2/564%3 h 35 min2 better 4 worse
West Jersey HospitalSame county · Voorhees3/570%2 h 25 min5 better 3 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Camden.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,631 cases Too few cases 3.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 180 cases Too few cases 12.3% 11.9%
Heart failure 386 cases Too few cases 9.3% 11.1%
Pneumonia 304 cases Too few cases 13.7% 15.2%
Stroke 422 cases Too few cases 10.1% 11.9%
COPD 76 cases Too few cases 9.4% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 294 cases Too few cases 2.1% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

3 worse than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.4 likely 1.19 – 1.6 1
After hip or knee replacement 49 cases Too few cases 6.2% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 251 cases No different 202.38 per 1,000 likely 168.39 per 1,000 – 236.37 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 9,323 cases Worse 1.66 per 1,000 likely 1.23 per 1,000 – 2.09 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 10,660 cases No different 0.25 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 11,298 cases No different 0.26 per 1,000 likely 0.09 per 1,000 – 0.44 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 3,697 cases No different 2.69 per 1,000 likely 1.56 per 1,000 – 3.81 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,636 cases Worse 3.75 per 1,000 likely 2.56 per 1,000 – 4.93 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 1,520 cases No different 7.62 per 1,000 likely 3.59 per 1,000 – 11.65 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 4,011 cases No different 3.91 per 1,000 likely 2.45 per 1,000 – 5.36 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,640 cases No different 6.09 per 1,000 likely 3.65 per 1,000 – 8.52 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 740 cases No different 1.99 per 1,000 likely 0.7 per 1,000 – 3.28 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,500 cases No different 1.08 per 1,000 likely 0.32 per 1,000 – 1.84 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.49 likely 0.25 – 0.88 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.91 likely 0.61 – 1.32 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.64 likely 0.36 – 1.07 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.8 likely 0.2 – 2.19 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.93 likely 0.56 – 1.46 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.76 likely 0.62 – 0.92 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 1 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 444 cases Too few cases 14.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 831 cases Too few cases 20.8% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 499 cases Too few cases 15.9% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 177 cases Too few cases 20% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 307 cases Too few cases 12.3% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 48 cases Too few cases 7.1% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 337 cases Too few cases 8.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 504 cases Too few cases -3.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 324 cases Too few cases 7.2 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 3,523 cases Worse 16 per 1,000 likely 13.1 per 1,000 – 19.5 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 711 cases Worse 13.2 per 100 likely 11.1 per 100 – 15.3 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 711 cases No different 5.3 per 100 likely 4.1 per 100 – 6.7 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,210 cases Better 0.8 likely 0.6 – 0.9 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,363 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 412 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 206
Hospitalist 157
Emergency Medicine 103
Physician Assistant 78
Nurse Practitioner 76
Anesthesiology 74
Diagnostic Radiology 72
Acute Care 59
Internal Medicine 58
Critical Care Medicine 48
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 23
Family 23

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2.1M general $520,797 · research $1.6M
All years, 2019–2025 $11M 1,389 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 48 64 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.1M
  • 2020 $699,883
  • 2021 $726,805
  • 2022 $1.1M
  • 2023 $3.7M
  • 2024 $1.4M
  • 2025 $2.1M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Grants $195,269 28
Speaking, teaching and other services $164,496 9
Space rental and facility fees $137,462 52
Gifts $9,117 2
Education $9,000 4
Debt forgiveness $2,756 3
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $2,697 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. $523,690 67
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $251,531 15
Masimo Corporation $149,296 2
Abbott Laboratories $145,610 10
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $132,425 4
Eli Lilly and Company $107,321 1
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $106,800 11
Exelixis Inc. $92,797 30

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
NCT05361174 Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. $257,078
117145 Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. $189,250
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesica… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $162,072
A Phase 2, Randomized, Active-controlled, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Belzutifan Plus Fulvestrant in Participants With Estrogen Receptor Positiv… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $130,425
NCT05629572 --- Clinical Evaluation of the i STAT hs-TnI Test to Aid in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Abbott Laboratories $117,203
EMBER-4: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3 STUDY OF ADJUVANT IMLUNESTRANT VS STANDARD ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY RECE… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT05514054 $107,321
A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of Zanzalintinib (XL092) in Combination With Pembrolizumab vs Pembrolizumab in First-Line Tre… Exelixis Inc. $80,397
81990 Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. $47,161

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Cooper University Hospital

Is Cooper University Hospital a good hospital?

Cooper University Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 2 and worse on 4. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Cooper University Hospital?

69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,158 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Cooper University Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 3% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Cooper University Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2.1M in payments to Cooper University Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.