USCareCheck

CMS certification 330101

New York-Presbyterian Hospital

525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

New York-Presbyterian Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 13 and worse on 2. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 44 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 2,640 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 2 worse 13 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 2,640 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
NY 67% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
69%
NY 66% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
NY 77% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
NY 77% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
NY 59% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
NY 85% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
65%
NY 69% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
49%
NY 49% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New York average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NY US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 518 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 44 min 3 h 14 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 23 visits sampled 5 h 19 min 4 h 54 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 492,273 patients 1% 2% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 162 patients 45% 60% 65%

How New York-Presbyterian Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
New York-Presbyterian HospitalThis hospital5/572%3 h 44 min13 better 2 worse
Lenox Hill HospitalSame city5/568%3 h 4 min9 better
Harlem Hospital CenterSame city2/549%2 h 24 min2 better 2 worse
Metropolitan Hospital CenterSame city3/564%2 h 51 min3 better
Mount Sinai HospitalSame city4/569%4 h 8 min9 better 3 worse
Hospital for Special SurgerySame city5/587%—5 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in New York.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 24,470 cases Too few cases 1.8% 3.9%
Heart attack 616 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 2,532 cases Too few cases 6.9% 11.1%
Pneumonia 3,140 cases Too few cases 10.9% 15.2%
Stroke 1,821 cases Too few cases 7.7% 11.9%
COPD 574 cases Too few cases 5.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 382 cases Too few cases 1.7% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

9 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Better 0.4 likely 0.3 – 0.51 1
After hip or knee replacement 1,240 cases Too few cases 4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 798 cases No different 156.83 per 1,000 likely 135.92 per 1,000 – 177.74 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 44,511 cases Better 0.09 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.3 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 48,588 cases No different 0.11 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.22 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 52,654 cases Better 0.14 per 1,000 likely 0.03 per 1,000 – 0.25 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 12,529 cases Better 0.94 per 1,000 likely 0.21 per 1,000 – 1.66 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 8,078 cases Better 0.48 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.06 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 8,277 cases Better 6.15 per 1,000 likely 4.51 per 1,000 – 7.79 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 14,926 cases Better 1.48 per 1,000 likely 0.6 per 1,000 – 2.36 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 8,436 cases Better 1.66 per 1,000 likely 0.42 per 1,000 – 2.91 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 3,187 cases No different 0.84 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.9 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 10,364 cases Better 0.35 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.86 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

4 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.63 likely 0.51 – 0.78 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.58 likely 0.44 – 0.74 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.72 likely 0.44 – 1.11 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.31 likely 0.05 – 1.04 1
MRSA bloodstream infections Better 0.74 likely 0.56 – 0.98 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.22 likely 0.18 – 0.27 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

1 worse than the nation 3 better than the nation
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 1,045 cases Too few cases 13.6% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 5,234 cases Too few cases 20.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 5,005 cases Too few cases 16.4% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 1,226 cases Too few cases 20.6% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 411 cases Too few cases 9.9% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 1,230 cases Too few cases 5.5% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 686 cases Too few cases 11 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 2,938 cases Too few cases 3 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 3,258 cases Too few cases 13.4 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 7,950 cases Better 10.6 per 1,000 likely 8.9 per 1,000 – 12.6 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,897 cases Worse 15.2 per 100 likely 13.8 per 100 – 16.7 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,897 cases Better 3.6 per 100 likely 2.9 per 100 – 4.4 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 4,225 cases Better 0.6 likely 0.6 – 0.7 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

2,207 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 616 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Physician Assistant 266
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 159
Anesthesiology 143
Emergency Medicine 98
Diagnostic Radiology 95
Family 88
Hospitalist 67
Psychiatry 66
Medical 64
Pharmacist 58
Adult Health 53
Physical Therapist 47

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $4.2M general $375,258 · research $3.8M
All years, 2019–2025 $21M 1,226 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 22 31 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $5.6M
  • 2020 $2.5M
  • 2021 $2.1M
  • 2022 $2.8M
  • 2023 $1.2M
  • 2024 $2.5M
  • 2025 $4.2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $246,797 11
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $85,317 8
Grants $26,458 10
Education $6,480 3
Space rental and facility fees $4,376 5
Gifts $3,515 1
Debt forgiveness $2,108 3
Food and beverage $207 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $2.1M 6
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $650,750 7
CathWorks, Inc. $529,886 11
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $235,000 4
Jenavalve Technology, Inc. $220,127 3
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, INC. $71,962 13
AngioDynamics, Inc. $60,000 1
Biocircuit Technologies Inc $50,000 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Phase II trial of tazemetostat plus mosunetuzumab in untreated follicular lymphoma Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc · NCT05994235 $1.9M
A Single Arm Phase II Study with Safety Run-in of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Combination with Immunotherapy for Patients with Me… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $558,960
ALL-RISE CathWorks, Inc. $529,886
A feasibility trial of tazemetostat plus CAR T cell therapy in B-cell lymphomas Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc · NCT05934838 $207,750
ESCAPE - EVALUATION OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. $71,962
An Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Combination With Standard of Care, Versus Standard of Care Alone, in Adult Mal… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $66,185
11202025 Pledge Biocircuit Technologies Inc $50,000
Efficacy of the COronary SInus Reducer in Patients With Refractory Angina II Shockwave Medical, Inc $34,779

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about New York-Presbyterian Hospital

Is New York-Presbyterian Hospital a good hospital?

New York-Presbyterian Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 13 and worse on 2. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend New York-Presbyterian Hospital?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 2,640 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the New York-Presbyterian Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 44 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does New York-Presbyterian Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $4.2M in payments to New York-Presbyterian Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.