USCareCheck

CMS certification 420018

Prisma Health Richland Hospital

5 Medical Park, Columbia, SC 29203

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Prisma Health Richland Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 23 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 45 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 66% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,307 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 23 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,307 completed surveys, 13% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
66%
SC 70% · US 71% · 3 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
67%
SC 72% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
77%
SC 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
78%
SC 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
56%
SC 63% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
85%
SC 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
63%
SC 71% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
54%
SC 62% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital South Carolina average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital SC US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 439 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 45 min 2 h 38 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 34 visits sampled 5 h 48 min 4 h 4 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 102,568 patients 1% 2% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 208 patients 55% 63% 65%

How Prisma Health Richland Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Prisma Health Richland HospitalThis hospital3/566%3 h 45 min4 better 1 worse
MUSC Health Columbia Medical Center DowntownSame city3/567%2 h 14 min2 better 1 worse
Columbia Sc VA Medical CenterSame city5/571%—1 better
Prisma Health Baptist ParkridgeSame city4/575%2 h 42 min2 better
Prisma Health BaptistSame city4/569%2 h 33 min2 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Columbia.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 3,884 cases Too few cases 3.1% 3.9%
Heart attack 326 cases Too few cases 10.6% 11.9%
Heart failure 663 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.1%
Pneumonia 236 cases Too few cases 16% 15.2%
Stroke 715 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
COPD 68 cases Too few cases 9.5% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 135 cases Too few cases 1.9% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

2 worse than the nation 1 better than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1.15 likely 0.91 – 1.4 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 221 cases Better 139.08 per 1,000 likely 106.3 per 1,000 – 171.86 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 7,523 cases Worse 1.27 per 1,000 likely 0.81 per 1,000 – 1.72 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 8,520 cases No different 0.16 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.34 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 8,755 cases No different 0.28 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.46 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,412 cases No different 2.08 per 1,000 likely 0.83 per 1,000 – 3.33 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 911 cases Worse 3.07 per 1,000 likely 1.72 per 1,000 – 4.42 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 888 cases No different 11.16 per 1,000 likely 6.28 per 1,000 – 16.04 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,552 cases No different 2.58 per 1,000 likely 0.86 per 1,000 – 4.29 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 898 cases No different 3.06 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 6.38 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 348 cases No different 1.49 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 2.9 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,422 cases No different 0.96 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 1.88 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 worse than the nation 2 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.56 likely 0.35 – 0.86 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.67 likely 0.41 – 1.04 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 2.51 likely 1.36 – 4.26 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.75 likely 0.04 – 3.7 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.72 likely 0.38 – 1.24 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.25 likely 0.16 – 0.38 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 444 cases Too few cases 15.7% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,044 cases Too few cases 20.2% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 318 cases Too few cases 16.7% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 139 cases Too few cases 20.4% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 140 cases Too few cases 12.7% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 365 cases Too few cases 29.6 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 764 cases Too few cases -10.1 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 241 cases Too few cases 17.1 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 218 cases No different 13 per 1,000 likely 9.7 per 1,000 – 17.5 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 451 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.3 —

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

173 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 5 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 56
Anesthesiology 21
Pharmacist 21
Emergency Medicine 17
Neonatal 7
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 6
Dietitian, Registered 5
Neonatal, Critical Care 4
Ambulatory Care 3
Neurology 3
Registered Nurse 3
Speech-Language Pathologist 3

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $380,417 general $56,170 · research $324,247
All years, 2019–2025 $1.5M 339 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 13 16 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $33,376
  • 2020 $5,497
  • 2021 $218,485
  • 2022 $254,551
  • 2023 $216,361
  • 2024 $384,564
  • 2025 $380,417

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $53,493 11
Gifts $1,065 2
Food and beverage $945 24
Debt forgiveness $617 2
Space rental and facility fees $50 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
United Therapeutics Corporation $182,549 51
Eli Lilly and Company $36,293 1
Medtronic, Inc. $35,422 8
Boston Scientific Corporation $34,765 8
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. $34,680 1
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $24,800 1
Stryker Corporation $9,047 8
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. $8,100 1

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Treprostinil in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonar… United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT04708782 $57,696
An Open-label Extension Study of Inhaled Treprostinil in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT04905693 $42,544
A PHASE 4, PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER, SINGLE-ARM STUDY OF A MEAN PULMONARY ARTERY PRESSURE-TARGETED APPROACH WITH EARLY AND RAPID TREPROSTINIL THERAPY… United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT05203510 $38,880
A PHASE 3, OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, SINGLE-ARM STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND EFFICACY OF DULAGLUTIDE 3.0 MG AND 4.5 M… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT06739122 $36,293
ALLEVIATE-HF Medtronic, Inc. $35,422
PULMONARY HYPERTENSION SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE FOR EARLIER DETECTION (PHINDER) United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT05776225 $24,821
A Dose-Escalating Study in Children With Hyperkalaemia Between Birth and less than 18 Years of Age to Evaluate Increasing Doses of Sodium Zirconium C… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $24,800
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multinational, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Treprostinil in Subjects With Prog… United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT05943535 $18,608

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Prisma Health Richland Hospital

Is Prisma Health Richland Hospital a good hospital?

Prisma Health Richland Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 23 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Prisma Health Richland Hospital?

66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,307 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Prisma Health Richland Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 45 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Prisma Health Richland Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $380,417 in payments to Prisma Health Richland Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.