USCareCheck

CMS certification 420027

Anmed Health

800 N Fant St, Anderson, SC 29621

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Anmed Health has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 66% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 626 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 626 completed surveys, 20% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
66%
SC 70% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
71%
SC 72% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
83%
SC 81% · US 80% · 5 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
SC 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
64%
SC 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
87%
SC 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
68%
SC 71% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
61%
SC 62% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital South Carolina average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital SC US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 386 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 6 min 2 h 38 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 15 visits sampled 8 h 39 min 4 h 4 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 69,248 patients 4% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 28 patients 61% 72% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 612 patients 63% 63% 65%

How Anmed Health compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Anmed HealthThis hospital4/566%4 h 6 min4 better 1 worse
Abbeville Area Medical CenterSame ZIP area · AbbevilleNot rated82%2 h 8 minNo different
Prisma Health Patewood HospitalSame ZIP area · Greenville5/581%—1 better
Prisma Health Greenville Memorial HospitalSame ZIP area · Greenville4/569%3 h 54 min6 better
Prisma Health Baptist Easley HospitalSame ZIP area · Easley4/564%2 h 58 min1 better
St Francis-DowntownSame ZIP area · Greenville4/577%2 h 43 min4 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Anderson.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 4,142 cases Too few cases 3.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 150 cases Too few cases 11.1% 11.9%
Heart failure 507 cases Too few cases 12.4% 11.1%
Pneumonia 855 cases Too few cases 17.6% 15.2%
Stroke 396 cases Too few cases 13.6% 11.9%
COPD 252 cases Too few cases 10.7% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 37 cases Too few cases 3% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

12 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.77 likely 0.47 – 1.08 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 69 cases No different 170.62 per 1,000 likely 118.62 per 1,000 – 222.63 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 6,928 cases No different 0.15 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.79 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 7,859 cases No different 0.23 per 1,000 likely 0.04 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 8,065 cases No different 0.31 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 0.5 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 1,567 cases No different 2.79 per 1,000 likely 1.34 per 1,000 – 4.24 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 677 cases No different 1.64 per 1,000 likely 0.13 per 1,000 – 3.16 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 712 cases No different 6.25 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 12.76 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 1,675 cases No different 4.29 per 1,000 likely 2.24 per 1,000 – 6.34 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 692 cases No different 3.93 per 1,000 likely 0.47 per 1,000 – 7.4 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 349 cases No different 1.89 per 1,000 likely 0.44 per 1,000 – 3.34 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 1,363 cases No different 0.78 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.73 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 5 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.9 likely 0.44 – 1.66 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.78 likely 0.48 – 1.2 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.84 likely 0.27 – 2.02 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.75 likely 0.3 – 1.56 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.23 likely 0.12 – 0.41 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 225 cases Too few cases 14.1% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 848 cases Too few cases 23% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 1,368 cases Too few cases 16.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 569 cases Too few cases 19.2% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 54 cases Too few cases 11.2% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 152 cases Too few cases 9.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 584 cases Too few cases 19.4 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 881 cases Too few cases 3.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,702 cases No different 12.7 per 1,000 likely 10.1 per 1,000 – 16 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 42 cases No different 9.4 per 100 likely 6.2 per 100 – 14 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 42 cases No different 5.4 per 100 likely 3.4 per 100 – 8.5 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 686 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.3 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

161 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 31
Emergency Medicine 21
Pediatrics 13
Anesthesiology 11
Family 11
Physician Assistant 9
Internal Medicine 8
Speech-Language Pathologist 8
Diagnostic Radiology 7
Physical Therapist 7
Nurse Practitioner 5
Pharmacist 5

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $348,493 general $5,508 · research $342,985
All years, 2019–2025 $2.3M 1,494 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 20 18 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $482,058
  • 2020 $248,759
  • 2021 $236,593
  • 2022 $342,389
  • 2023 $396,114
  • 2024 $230,522
  • 2025 $348,493

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Food and beverage $1,870 24
Debt forgiveness $1,557 5
Entertainment $1,148 3
Space rental and facility fees $843 1
Gifts $90 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
United Therapeutics Corporation $139,597 25
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $78,207 37
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $40,386 2
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $13,662 1
Sanofi US Services INC. $13,229 1
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $12,666 1
Gyrus ACMI, Inc. $11,550 2
Medtronic, Inc. $11,063 4

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
PULMONARY HYPERTENSION SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE FOR EARLIER DETECTION (PHINDER) United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT05776225 $117,462
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Milvexian, an Oral … Janssen Research & Development, LLC $68,139
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BMS-986278 in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $31,114
A Real-world Patient Registry in Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD) United Therapeutics Corporation · NCT06388421 $22,135
Evaluation of Inclisiran Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Limb Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Corona… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $13,662
A Phase 2b/Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, to investigate the efficacy and safety of lunsekimig in adult pa… SANOFI US SERVICES INC. · NCT07190209 $13,229
A Phase III Randomised Doubleblind Study to Evaluate the Effect of Balcinrenone Dapagliflozin Compared with Dapagliflozin on the Risk of Heart Failur… AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $12,666
The Spiration Valve System (SVS) Post-Market Registry Study for Severe Emphysema Gyrus ACMI, Inc. · NCT04302272 $11,550

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Anmed Health

Is Anmed Health a good hospital?

Anmed Health has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Anmed Health?

66% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 626 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Anmed Health emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 6 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 4% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Anmed Health receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $348,493 in payments to Anmed Health for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.