USCareCheck

CMS certification 460006

Lds Hospital

8th Avenue and C Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84143

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Lds Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. 75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 21 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on none. Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 56 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 5/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 75% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 1,168 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 0 worse 5 better of 21 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,168 completed surveys, 24% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
75%
UT 77% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
73%
UT 78% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
79%
UT 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
83%
UT 82% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
62%
UT 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
89%
UT 89% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
81%
UT 79% · US 74% · 5 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
63%
UT 62% · US 60% · 4 of 5 stars

This hospital Utah average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as medium; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital UT US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 381 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 2 h 45 min 2 h 56 min 2 h 13 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 95 visits sampled 2 h 6 min 3 h 25 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 20,621 patients 1% 1% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 89 patients 62% 68% 65%

How Lds Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Lds HospitalThis hospital5/575%2 h 56 min5 better
VA Salt Lake City Healthcare - George E. Wahlen VA Medical CenterSame city4/580%—2 better
University of Utah Hospital and ClinicsSame city5/583%3 h 54 min7 better 2 worse
St Mark's HospitalSame city4/572%1 h 49 min5 better
Holy Cross Hospital - Salt LakeSame city3/566%2 h 26 min1 better
Intermountain Medical CenterSame county · Murray5/578%3 h 38 min9 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Salt Lake City.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 1,079 cases Too few cases 3.2% 3.9%
Heart failure 35 cases Too few cases 10.8% 11.1%
Pneumonia 105 cases Too few cases 16.4% 15.2%

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 0.91 likely 0.51 – 1.3 1
After hip or knee replacement 105 cases Too few cases 4.2% 4.1%
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 1,217 cases No different 0.67 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.61 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 1,537 cases No different 0.2 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 0.42 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 1,634 cases No different 0.29 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 0.5 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 474 cases No different 2.39 per 1,000 likely 0.75 per 1,000 – 4.03 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 327 cases No different 1.55 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 3.22 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 329 cases No different 7.85 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 15.98 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 501 cases No different 3.08 per 1,000 likely 0.76 per 1,000 – 5.39 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 304 cases No different 3.85 per 1,000 likely 0.13 per 1,000 – 7.58 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 151 cases No different 2.3 per 1,000 likely 0.82 per 1,000 – 3.78 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 425 cases No different 1.11 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 2.1 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

2 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.62 likely 0.1 – 2.06 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.23 likely 0.01 – 1.12 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.41 likely 0.02 – 2.04 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.33 likely 0.16 – 0.6 1

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after heart failure 83 cases Too few cases 21.4% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 203 cases Too few cases 17.2% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 46 cases Too few cases 19.8% 20%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 121 cases Too few cases 4.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after heart failure 39 cases Too few cases -63.8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 120 cases Too few cases -23.3 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 1,290 cases No different 12.3 per 1,000 likely 9.4 per 1,000 – 16 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 92 cases No different 8.4 per 100 likely 5.8 per 100 – 11.9 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 92 cases No different 4.6 per 100 likely 2.9 per 100 – 7.2 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 426 cases No different 1 likely 0.7 – 1.3 —

4 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $744,756 general $8,500 · research $736,256
All years, 2019–2025 $5M 421 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 12 12 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $1.6M
  • 2020 $427,230
  • 2021 $949,883
  • 2022 $740,885
  • 2023 $235,182
  • 2024 $287,346
  • 2025 $744,756

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $8,500 4

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Becton, Dickinson and Company $290,500 3
Abbvie INC. $187,416 3
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $112,218 13
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $56,690 2
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $39,909 1
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $15,232 4
Incyte Corporation $13,966 20
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. $11,286 3

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A15-873;Venclexta;Bottle: ABT-199 100mg Yellow Film Coated Tablet 120 Tablets ABBVIE INC. $156,180
Cybergrant: 99486423 Becton, Dickinson and Company $150,000
CyberGrant 100512497 Becton, Dickinson and Company $140,000
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, DOSE-ESCALATION, AND DOSE-EXPANSION STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND CLINICAL ACTIVITY OFSNDX-5613IN COMBINATION WI… Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $110,967
A Phase II, multi-part, three-year, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, active-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safet… Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $56,690
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Study of Subcutaneous Nivolumab + Relatlimab Fixeddose Combination versus Intravenous Nivolumab + Relatlimab Fixed… E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $39,909
A Phase Ib Study of the Combination of Venetoclax with Chemotherapy as Frontline Therapy in Older Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) ABBVIE INC. $31,236
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Dose-Expansion Study of DSP 5336 in Adult Patients with Acute Leukemia and Other Selected Hematologic Malig… Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. · NCT04988555 $15,232

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Lds Hospital

Is Lds Hospital a good hospital?

Lds Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. Of the 21 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 5 and worse on none. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Lds Hospital?

75% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,168 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Lds Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 2 h 56 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with medium patient volume, like this one, the median is 2 h 45 min. 1% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Lds Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $744,756 in payments to Lds Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.