USCareCheck

CMS certification 490009

University of Virginia Medical Center

1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22908

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

University of Virginia Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. 80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 38 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 4/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 80% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 4/5 1,521 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 1 worse 4 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,521 completed surveys, 26% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
80%
VA 70% · US 71% · 5 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
75%
VA 72% · US 72% · 4 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
80%
VA 81% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
81%
VA 80% · US 80% · 4 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
61%
VA 62% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
88%
VA 87% · US 86% · 4 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
73%
VA 74% · US 74% · 4 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
47%
VA 60% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital Virginia average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital VA US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 363 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 38 min 2 h 41 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 19 visits sampled 6 h 1 min 4 h 2 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 190,355 patients 2% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 13 patients 54% 69% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 147 patients 29% 67% 65%

How University of Virginia Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
University of Virginia Medical CenterThis hospital4/580%4 h 38 min4 better 1 worse
Sentara Martha Jefferson HospitalSame city4/582%2 h 20 min3 better
Augusta HealthSame ZIP area · Fishersville4/567%3 h 7 min3 better 1 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Charlottesville.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 5,417 cases Too few cases 3.3% 3.9%
Heart attack 265 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 672 cases Too few cases 10.2% 11.1%
Pneumonia 463 cases Too few cases 14.7% 15.2%
Stroke 476 cases Too few cases 13.2% 11.9%
COPD 111 cases Too few cases 9.5% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 220 cases Too few cases 2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

1 worse than the nation 11 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure No different 1 likely 0.82 – 1.17 1
After hip or knee replacement 131 cases Too few cases 4.3% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 250 cases No different 141.48 per 1,000 likely 107.28 per 1,000 – 175.69 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 11,873 cases No different 0.45 per 1,000 likely 0.05 per 1,000 – 0.84 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 12,730 cases No different 0.27 per 1,000 likely 0.1 per 1,000 – 0.43 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 13,661 cases No different 0.37 per 1,000 likely 0.21 per 1,000 – 0.54 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 5,063 cases No different 2.71 per 1,000 likely 1.74 per 1,000 – 3.67 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 3,339 cases Worse 2.71 per 1,000 likely 1.74 per 1,000 – 3.69 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,246 cases No different 8.42 per 1,000 likely 5.49 per 1,000 – 11.34 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 5,659 cases No different 4.34 per 1,000 likely 3.02 per 1,000 – 5.65 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 3,317 cases No different 4.8 per 1,000 likely 2.85 per 1,000 – 6.75 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,516 cases No different 1.34 per 1,000 likely 0.12 per 1,000 – 2.55 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 3,915 cases No different 0.65 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 1.34 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

3 better than the nation 3 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.38 likely 0.21 – 0.63 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.21 likely 0.08 – 0.47 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 0.9 likely 0.53 – 1.43 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0.53 likely 0.09 – 1.75 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.76 likely 0.45 – 1.21 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.32 likely 0.22 – 0.45 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

2 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 365 cases Too few cases 14.3% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 871 cases Too few cases 19.9% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 557 cases Too few cases 16.1% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 209 cases Too few cases 20% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 147 cases Too few cases 9.6% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 137 cases Too few cases 4.8% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 363 cases Too few cases 35.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 763 cases Too few cases -8 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 474 cases Too few cases -6.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 4,614 cases Better 10 per 1,000 likely 8.1 per 1,000 – 12.3 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 1,313 cases No different 11 per 100 likely 9.4 per 100 – 12.9 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 1,313 cases No different 5.2 per 100 likely 4.1 per 100 – 6.5 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 3,280 cases Better 0.7 likely 0.6 – 0.8 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

1,299 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 1,039 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Acute Care 131
Anesthesiology 119
Diagnostic Radiology 106
Emergency Medicine 101
Physician Assistant 69
Hospitalist 62
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 50
Dietitian, Registered 39
Pediatrics 32
Family 30
Gastroenterology 29
Psychiatry 20

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $17.9M general $1.1M · research $16.8M
All years, 2019–2025 $116.6M 10,804 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 303 146 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $13M
  • 2020 $17.2M
  • 2021 $14.8M
  • 2022 $17.2M
  • 2023 $16.1M
  • 2024 $20.5M
  • 2025 $17.9M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Space rental and facility fees $507,251 117
Grants $313,786 40
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $76,271 10
Speaking, teaching and other services $73,442 22
Charitable contributions $32,450 3
Education $25,750 7
Debt forgiveness $22,630 53
Gifts $14,875 8
Royalties and licensing fees $7,500 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1.5M 174
Eli Lilly and Company $1.4M 13
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1.3M 359
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $1.1M 4
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $877,118 29
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $787,830 17
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $745,264 32
Medtronic, Inc. $622,669 71

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
LONG-TERM REAL-WORLD COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DONANEMAB PLUS USUAL CARE VERSUS USUAL CARE ALONE IN US PATIENTS WITH EARLY SYMPTOMATIC ALZHEIMER'S… Eli Lilly and Company · NCT06566170 $1M
Safety and Feasibility Testing of AIDANET in Children 6-13 YO Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $592,778
STUDY NAME#Fitness-adapted, pembrolizumab-based therapy for untreated classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients 60 years of age and above cHL 001 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $445,007
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Talquetamab in Combination with Pomalidomide (Tal-P), Talquetamab in Combination with Teclistamab (Tal-Tec), and… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $331,425
Cavitation-facilitated AAV Transduction BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. $312,936
A STUDY OF RIPRETINIB VS SUNITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED GIST WITH SPECIFIC KIT EXON MUTATIONS WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH IMATINIB (INSIGHT) Deciphera Pharmaceuticals Inc. · NCT05734105 $293,212
MININET (Safety and Feasibility Study of Smaller Network Version of AIDANET) Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $290,000
A Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled Parallel group Multi Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ63733657 an Antitau Monoclonal… Janssen Research & Development, LLC $283,256

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about University of Virginia Medical Center

Is University of Virginia Medical Center a good hospital?

University of Virginia Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 1. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend University of Virginia Medical Center?

80% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,521 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the University of Virginia Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 38 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 2% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does University of Virginia Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $17.9M in payments to University of Virginia Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.