USCareCheck

CMS certification 330285

Strong Memorial Hospital

601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

Strong Memorial Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. 69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 7 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 3/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 69% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 946 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 4 better of 25 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 946 completed surveys, 27% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
69%
NY 67% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
63%
NY 66% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
76%
NY 77% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
75%
NY 77% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
57%
NY 59% · US 62% · 2 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
86%
NY 85% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
58%
NY 69% · US 74% · 2 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
42%
NY 49% · US 60% · 2 of 5 stars

This hospital New York average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital NY US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 381 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 4 h 7 min 3 h 14 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 19 visits sampled 4 h 38 min 4 h 54 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 116,789 patients 5% 2% 2%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 113 patients 45% 60% 65%

How Strong Memorial Hospital compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
Strong Memorial HospitalThis hospital3/569%4 h 7 min4 better 3 worse
Unity HospitalSame city2/562%4 h 59 min4 better 3 worse
Rochester General HospitalSame city2/560%3 h 53 min2 better 5 worse
Highland HospitalSame city3/572%5 h 4 min2 better 2 worse

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Rochester.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 6,267 cases Too few cases 3.4% 3.9%
Heart attack 193 cases Too few cases 11% 11.9%
Heart failure 324 cases Too few cases 11.5% 11.1%
Pneumonia 275 cases Too few cases 10.6% 15.2%
Stroke 928 cases Too few cases 11.6% 11.9%
COPD 72 cases Too few cases 9.1% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 70 cases Too few cases 3.4% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

3 worse than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.33 likely 1.1 – 1.55 1
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 212 cases No different 192.98 per 1,000 likely 157.6 per 1,000 – 228.36 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 8,653 cases No different 0.82 per 1,000 likely 0.37 per 1,000 – 1.27 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 9,231 cases No different 0.34 per 1,000 likely 0.15 per 1,000 – 0.52 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 9,824 cases Worse 0.58 per 1,000 likely 0.4 per 1,000 – 0.75 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 2,356 cases No different 3.06 per 1,000 likely 1.85 per 1,000 – 4.26 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 1,021 cases No different 1.82 per 1,000 likely 0.49 per 1,000 – 3.16 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 995 cases No different 10.43 per 1,000 likely 6.13 per 1,000 – 14.74 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 2,561 cases No different 3.46 per 1,000 likely 1.74 per 1,000 – 5.18 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 1,063 cases Worse 9.81 per 1,000 likely 7.02 per 1,000 – 12.6 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 637 cases No different 2.16 per 1,000 likely 0.82 per 1,000 – 3.5 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 2,092 cases No different 0.99 per 1,000 likely 0.14 per 1,000 – 1.84 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 worse than the nation 3 better than the nation 2 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) Better 0.75 likely 0.56 – 0.97 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) Better 0.44 likely 0.29 – 0.63 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Worse 1.81 likely 1.18 – 2.68 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 0 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.72 likely 0.44 – 1.14 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.41 likely 0.32 – 0.52 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 640 cases Too few cases 12.9% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 976 cases Too few cases 20.8% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 704 cases Too few cases 17.8% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 240 cases Too few cases 20.5% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 206 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 212 cases Too few cases -26.9 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 375 cases Too few cases 40.2 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 283 cases Too few cases 12.7 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 965 cases No different 13.5 per 1,000 likely 10.3 per 1,000 – 17.7 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 929 cases No different 11.7 per 100 likely 9.9 per 100 – 13.8 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 929 cases No different 5.3 per 100 likely 4.2 per 100 – 6.8 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 1,047 cases No different 1 likely 0.8 – 1.2 —

2 more measures had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

2,933 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 926 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Family 222
Physician Assistant 206
Pediatrics 194
Anesthesiology 148
Emergency Medicine 116
Nurse Practitioner 114
Acute Care 108
Adult Health 108
Internal Medicine 108
Pharmacist 89
Diagnostic Radiology 86
Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered 72

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $26.6M general $1.8M · research $24.8M
All years, 2019–2025 $185.1M 10,816 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 190 120 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $25.1M
  • 2020 $26M
  • 2021 $31.8M
  • 2022 $27.1M
  • 2023 $25.8M
  • 2024 $22.8M
  • 2025 $26.6M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Speaking, teaching and other services $910,222 78
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $273,447 168
Royalties and licensing fees $218,613 9
Space rental and facility fees $186,676 81
Grants $120,575 36
Charitable contributions $51,895 21
Consulting fees $37,858 5
Education $17,121 4
Gifts $500 1

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Pfizer INC. $7.6M 78
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7.2M 50
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $1.1M 21
AstraZeneca UK Limited $995,995 9
ModernaTX, Inc. $552,843 55
Kite Pharma, Inc. $548,560 108
United Therapeutics Corporation $494,090 64
Genentech, Inc. $485,858 29

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
THE MICROBIOLOGY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF MODERATE TO SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS IN HOSPITALIZED ADULTS AFTER THE COVID19 PANDEMIC MAY 11 20… PFIZER INC. $7M
Initial Therapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Acalabrutinib and High Frequency Low Dose Subcutaneous Rituximab AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $6.1M
a phase 3 prospective,multicenter,randomized,open label trial of acalabrutinib plus venetoclax versus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab in previously untr… AstraZeneca UK Limited $815,883
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Belzutifan MK-6482 Plus Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Plac… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $461,396
First-in-Human Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of the BTK Degrader, ABBV-101, in Participants with B-cell Ma… ABBVIE INC. · NCT05753501 $434,275
A Study to Investigate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA-1345 Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in High-risk Adults ModernaTX, Inc. · NCT06067230 $350,562
An Open-Label Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Effects of Sotatercept When Added to Background Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension PAH Therapy f… Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC $324,524
A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of KTE-X19 in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (ZUMA 2) Kite Pharma, Inc. $285,416

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about Strong Memorial Hospital

Is Strong Memorial Hospital a good hospital?

Strong Memorial Hospital has a CMS overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars. Of the 25 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 4 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend Strong Memorial Hospital?

69% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 946 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the Strong Memorial Hospital emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 4 h 7 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 5% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does Strong Memorial Hospital receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $26.6M in payments to Strong Memorial Hospital for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.