USCareCheck

CMS certification 420004

MUSC Medical Center

169 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425

Acute Care Hospitals Emergency services Birthing-friendly

MUSC Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. 72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 3. Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min).

Every figure on this page is published by CMS; we arrange and explain it, and score nothing ourselves.

CMS overall rating 2/5 CMS summary of quality measures
Would definitely recommend 72% US average 71%
Patient survey rating 3/5 1,358 completed surveys
Compared with the nation 3 worse 3 better of 27 measures CMS could compare

What patients said

Answers from patients who stayed here, collected by CMS in the national HCAHPS survey: 1,358 completed surveys, 19% response rate, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

Would definitely recommend the hospital
72%
SC 70% · US 71% · 4 of 5 stars
Rated the hospital 9 or 10 out of 10
70%
SC 72% · US 72% · 3 of 5 stars
Nurses always communicated well
78%
SC 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Doctors always communicated well
77%
SC 81% · US 80% · 3 of 5 stars
Staff always explained new medicines
59%
SC 63% · US 62% · 3 of 5 stars
Given information about recovering at home
84%
SC 87% · US 86% · 3 of 5 stars
Room was always clean
68%
SC 71% · US 74% · 3 of 5 stars
Always quiet at night
57%
SC 62% · US 60% · 3 of 5 stars

This hospital South Carolina average US average

Emergency department

How long emergency patients spent here and how some time-critical care went, from CMS's timely and effective care measures, Oct 2024 – Sep 2025. CMS classes this emergency department's patient volume as very high; busier departments tend to have longer times, so the national median for departments of the same volume is shown too. These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Measure This hospital SC US
Median time in the emergency department before leaving Lower is better · 374 visits sampled · US median for EDs of the same volume: 3 h 21 min 3 h 25 min 2 h 38 min 2 h 42 min
Median time for psychiatric and mental health patients Lower is better · 21 visits sampled 4 h 21 min 4 h 4 min 4 h 17 min
Left before being seen Lower is better · 153,177 patients 4% 2% 2%
Stroke symptoms: brain scan read within 45 minutes Higher is better · 27 patients 89% 72% 69%
Severe sepsis and septic shock: all recommended care given Higher is better · 393 patients 52% 63% 65%

How MUSC Medical Center compares with nearby hospitals

The closest hospitals of the same kind that CMS rates or surveys - the same city first, then the same county and ZIP area. Every figure is CMS's: the overall star rating, the share of patients who would definitely recommend the hospital, the median time emergency patients spent before leaving, and how many death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS found better or worse than the national rate.

Hospital CMS stars Would recommend ER median time Vs the nation
MUSC Medical CenterThis hospital2/572%3 h 25 min3 better 3 worse
Bon Secours-St Francis Xavier HospitalSame city3/579%2 h 33 min1 better 3 worse
Trident Medical CenterSame city3/565%2 h 6 min1 better 2 worse
Charleston VA Medical CenterSame city5/581%—2 better 1 worse
Roper HospitalSame city4/580%1 h 36 min5 better 2 worse
Novant Health East Cooper Medical CenterSame county · Mount Pleasant4/575%2 h 23 min1 better

Hospitals differ in size and in how sick their patients are. CMS adjusts its outcome measures for that, but a star or a percentage is a starting point for questions, not a verdict. All hospitals in Charleston.

Deaths

How many patients died within 30 days of admission, adjusted by CMS for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2025.

Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
All patients, hospital-wide 7,015 cases Too few cases 3.7% 3.9%
Heart attack 228 cases Too few cases 10.4% 11.9%
Heart failure 559 cases Too few cases 11% 11.1%
Pneumonia 463 cases Too few cases 16.9% 15.2%
Stroke 839 cases Too few cases 9.8% 11.9%
COPD 164 cases Too few cases 7.1% 8.6%
Heart bypass surgery (CABG) 202 cases Too few cases 2% 2.4%

Complications

How often patients had serious complications, most of them after surgery, adjusted for how sick they were. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2022 – Jun 2024.

3 worse than the nation 9 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Serious complications, combined measure Worse 1.48 likely 1.3 – 1.65 1
After hip or knee replacement 66 cases Too few cases 5.4% 4.1%
Deaths after a serious but treatable surgical complication 405 cases No different 184.75 per 1,000 likely 156.29 per 1,000 – 213.22 per 1,000 173.3 per 1,000
Pressure ulcers (bed sores) 13,310 cases Worse 1.91 per 1,000 likely 1.53 per 1,000 – 2.29 per 1,000 0.63 per 1,000
Collapsed lung caused by a procedure 15,888 cases No different 0.22 per 1,000 likely 0.06 per 1,000 – 0.39 per 1,000 0.21 per 1,000
Broken bones from falls in the hospital 17,142 cases No different 0.24 per 1,000 likely 0.08 per 1,000 – 0.4 per 1,000 0.27 per 1,000
Bleeding or hematoma after surgery 5,923 cases No different 1.91 per 1,000 likely 0.98 per 1,000 – 2.83 per 1,000 2.34 per 1,000
Kidney injury needing dialysis after surgery 3,368 cases No different 1.67 per 1,000 likely 0.62 per 1,000 – 2.71 per 1,000 1.67 per 1,000
Breathing failure after surgery 3,319 cases No different 12.03 per 1,000 likely 9.03 per 1,000 – 15.04 per 1,000 9.42 per 1,000
Blood clots in the lungs or legs after surgery 6,543 cases No different 4.13 per 1,000 likely 2.86 per 1,000 – 5.39 per 1,000 3.52 per 1,000
Sepsis after surgery 3,423 cases No different 5.28 per 1,000 likely 3.35 per 1,000 – 7.22 per 1,000 5.27 per 1,000
Surgical wound splitting open 1,622 cases No different 1.18 per 1,000 likely 0 per 1,000 – 2.43 per 1,000 1.77 per 1,000
Accidental cut or tear during abdominal surgery 4,407 cases Worse 1.84 per 1,000 likely 1.17 per 1,000 – 2.51 per 1,000 1.06 per 1,000

Infections caught in the hospital

Standardized infection ratio: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one. Lower is better. Data from Oct 2024 – Sep 2025.

1 better than the nation 5 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Bloodstream infections from central lines (CLABSI) No different 0.84 likely 0.64 – 1.1 1
Urinary tract infections from catheters (CAUTI) No different 0.78 likely 0.56 – 1.08 1
Surgical site infections after colon surgery No different 1.47 likely 0.98 – 2.12 1
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy No different 1.62 likely 0.71 – 3.2 1
MRSA bloodstream infections No different 0.94 likely 0.6 – 1.39 1
C. diff intestinal infections Better 0.52 likely 0.41 – 0.64 1

Readmissions and return visits

How often patients had to come back to a hospital after going home. Lower is better. Data from Jul 2023 – Jun 2025.

4 no different
Measure CMS comparison This hospital National
Readmitted after a heart attack 473 cases Too few cases 15.4% 14.4%
Readmitted after heart failure 1,099 cases Too few cases 21.7% 21.3%
Readmitted after pneumonia 730 cases Too few cases 19.4% 17.3%
Readmitted after COPD 380 cases Too few cases 21.1% 20%
Readmitted after heart bypass surgery 140 cases Too few cases 9.4% 11%
Readmitted after hip or knee replacement 62 cases Too few cases 6.2% 5.8%
Days back in hospital after a heart attack 354 cases Too few cases 5.5 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after heart failure 682 cases Too few cases 14.7 days per 100 —
Days back in hospital after pneumonia 483 cases Too few cases 45.5 days per 100 —
Unplanned visits after an outpatient colonoscopy 3,533 cases No different 12.5 per 1,000 likely 10.1 per 1,000 – 15.6 per 1,000 13 per 1,000
Hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy 904 cases No different 10.6 per 100 likely 8.8 per 100 – 12.6 per 100 10.7 per 100
ER visits during outpatient chemotherapy 904 cases No different 6 per 100 likely 4.7 per 100 – 7.5 per 100 5.4 per 100
Unplanned visits after outpatient surgery 2,273 cases No different 0.9 likely 0.8 – 1.1 —

1 more measure had too few cases here to report.

Clinicians registered at this address

974 clinicians give this hospital's street address as their practice location in NPPES, the federal provider registry, plus 57 residents and trainees. The same address can take in offices and clinics in the building, and a listing does not prove admitting privileges or current employment.

Specialty Clinicians
Internal Medicine 179
Anesthesiology 92
Pediatrics 84
Psychiatry 73
Emergency Medicine 72
Surgery 72
Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology 35
Family Medicine 35
Obstetrics & Gynecology 29
Neurology 23
Diagnostic Radiology 20
Neurological Surgery 13

First 12 alphabetically

Money from drug and device companies

Drug and device makers have to report what they pay teaching hospitals to CMS's Open Payments program. At many teaching hospitals most of it is research funding, or royalties for inventions the hospital licensed to a company. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.

2025 total $2.2M general $510,732 · research $1.7M
All years, 2019–2025 $19.1M 2,487 reported payments
Studies funded, 2025 59 63 companies paid in total
  • 2019 $2.4M
  • 2020 $2.7M
  • 2021 $2.8M
  • 2022 $3M
  • 2023 $3.6M
  • 2024 $2.4M
  • 2025 $2.2M

General payments Research payments

What the 2025 general payments were for

Type of payment Amount Payments
Medical devices and supplies on long-term loan $175,912 20
Speaking, teaching and other services $93,015 34
Grants $82,000 8
Space rental and facility fees $54,400 14
Debt forgiveness $53,003 25
Charitable contributions $41,500 2
Consulting fees $10,000 4
Food and beverage $632 13
Gifts $270 3

Largest paying companies, 2025

Company Amount Payments
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $317,758 85
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $212,648 2
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $204,958 6
Medtronic, Inc. $189,854 24
Transmedics, INC. $150,260 4
Exactech, INC. $93,205 8
Intuitive Surgical, INC. $89,931 13
AngioDynamics, Inc. $73,000 2

Largest research studies funded here, 2025

Study Amount
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BMS-986278 in Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $211,364
Cardiac RADIoablation versus repeat catheter Ablation: a pivotal randomized clinical Trial Evaluating safety and efficacy for patients with high-risk Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $145,463
OCS-LIVER-OLP-II TRANSMEDICS, INC. $125,060
CR09-005 EQUINOXE PMCF EXACTECH, INC. $88,130
STUDY TO CHECK THE SAFETY OF FAZIRSIRAN AND LEARN IF FAZIRSIRAN CAN HELP PEOPLE WITH LIVER DISEASE AND SCARRING (FIBROSIS) DUE TO AN ABNORMAL VERSION… Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $87,572
Evaluation of the GORE Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of Isolated Lesions, Pseudoaneurysms, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcers of Ascending Aorta … W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · NCT05800743 $61,692
Cryoablation for Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (FULCRUM-VT) Adagio Medical, Inc. · NCT05675865 $55,556
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label Safety Trial of GEN3013 in Patients With Relapsed, Progressive or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma. Genmab U.S., Inc. $50,536

Amounts are as the paying companies reported them to CMS; Open Payments data retrieved 13 Sep 2026. Full record on CMS Open Payments.

How to read this page

  • Everything here is published by CMS on Care Compare. We arrange it and explain it; the star ratings and the better / worse verdicts are CMS's, not ours.
  • “No different” is the most common result on most measures at most hospitals. CMS only calls a result better or worse when the difference from the national rate is statistically clear.
  • Death, complication and readmission rates are adjusted by CMS for how sick patients were, so hospitals that treat sicker patients can be compared fairly.
  • Infection results are ratios: 1.0 means as many infections as CMS predicted for a hospital like this one, below 1.0 is fewer.
  • These are hospital-wide results. They do not rate an individual doctor, nurse or department, and they are not medical advice.

CMS Care Compare data retrieved 4 Oct 2026, refreshed weekly. Where this data comes from and how we handle it · Report an error

Common questions about MUSC Medical Center

Is MUSC Medical Center a good hospital?

MUSC Medical Center has a CMS overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars. Of the 27 death, complication, infection and readmission measures CMS could compare, it does better than the nation on 3 and worse on 3. These are hospital-wide results published by CMS; they do not rate individual doctors or departments.

Would patients recommend MUSC Medical Center?

72% of patients who answered CMS's national survey would definitely recommend it, against a US average of 71%. The figure comes from 1,358 completed HCAHPS surveys.

How long is the wait in the MUSC Medical Center emergency room?

Emergency patients spend a median of 3 h 25 min in its emergency department before leaving (US median 2 h 42 min). Among US emergency departments with very high patient volume, like this one, the median is 3 h 21 min. 4% of emergency patients left before being seen (US 2%). These are medians over a year of visits, not a live wait time.

Does MUSC Medical Center receive money from drug and device companies?

Drug and device makers reported $2.2M in payments to MUSC Medical Center for 2025, most of it research funding, under the federal Open Payments program. A payment on its own does not show a conflict of interest.